Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
P&H T250 vs Grove TMS300 Crane Comparison
#1
When it comes to choosing the right mobile crane for heavy lifting, contractors and fleet managers often debate between different models and brands. Among the notable options in the mobile crane market are the P&H T250 and the Grove TMS300. Both are respected in the industry, known for their robust construction, reliability, and versatility. However, they differ in several key aspects, including lifting capacity, reach, stability, and design. In this article, we will compare the two cranes, breaking down their specifications, features, and overall performance to help you determine which might be the better choice for your needs.
Overview of the P&H T250
The P&H T250 is a rough-terrain crane manufactured by P&H Cranes, a company that was a significant player in the crane industry before being acquired by Terex. The T250 is designed for high-performance lifting in tough, off-road environments, making it ideal for construction, mining, and heavy industrial projects. It features a heavy-duty chassis, all-terrain tires, and a powerful lifting mechanism, making it suited for various challenging terrains.
  • Lifting Capacity: The P&H T250 has a maximum lifting capacity of 25 tons (22.7 metric tonnes), which is adequate for many medium to heavy lifting tasks.
  • Boom Length: The crane is equipped with a telescoping boom that extends up to 80 feet (24.4 meters), providing excellent reach for most construction tasks.
  • Engine and Power: The T250 is powered by a diesel engine, providing the torque necessary for lifting heavy loads in demanding conditions. The engine is designed to deliver reliable performance and fuel efficiency.
  • Dimensions and Mobility: With its rough-terrain capabilities, the P&H T250 has a relatively compact design, which allows it to maneuver in narrow or confined spaces. Its heavy-duty axles and all-terrain tires enable it to operate on uneven surfaces.
Overview of the Grove TMS300
The Grove TMS300 is a truck-mounted crane from Grove, one of the most prominent manufacturers of mobile cranes. Grove, now a part of Manitowoc, is known for its cutting-edge crane technology and extensive range of equipment. The TMS300 is designed for road transportation, offering a balance between performance and ease of mobility.
  • Lifting Capacity: The Grove TMS300 boasts a maximum lifting capacity of 30 tons (27.2 metric tonnes), providing a higher lifting capacity than the P&H T250. This makes the TMS300 more suitable for larger lifting operations.
  • Boom Length: The crane features a 100-foot (30.5 meters) telescoping boom, giving it a significant reach advantage over the P&H T250, which makes it ideal for tasks requiring extended reach.
  • Engine and Power: The TMS300 is powered by a robust engine with a focus on fuel efficiency and operational performance. It’s designed for both highway transportation and site mobility, making it versatile in a variety of environments.
  • Dimensions and Mobility: While the Grove TMS300 has a larger footprint than the P&H T250 due to its truck-mounted design, it still offers significant mobility. Its ability to drive on highways and reach construction sites quickly is a major advantage in projects requiring frequent relocation.
Key Comparisons Between the P&H T250 and Grove TMS300
  1. Lifting Capacity
    • P&H T250: 25 tons (22.7 metric tonnes)
    • Grove TMS300: 30 tons (27.2 metric tonnes)
    The Grove TMS300 has a higher lifting capacity, which allows it to handle heavier loads compared to the P&H T250. This makes the TMS300 a better choice for larger construction projects or jobs that require lifting more substantial weights.
  2. Boom Length and Reach
    • P&H T250: 80 feet (24.4 meters)
    • Grove TMS300: 100 feet (30.5 meters)
    The Grove TMS300 has a 100-foot boom, which provides a greater reach than the 80-foot boom on the P&H T250. This extended reach allows the TMS300 to perform tasks at greater heights, making it more versatile for jobs that require additional height, such as building construction and high-rise work.
  3. Design and Mobility
    • P&H T250: Rough-terrain crane with off-road capabilities
    • Grove TMS300: Truck-mounted crane, road-worthy for highway transportation
    The P&H T250 is designed primarily for off-road use, making it ideal for rough terrain and construction sites that are not easily accessible by road. It has superior off-road capabilities, which give it an advantage in environments where mobility over uneven surfaces is required.
    The Grove TMS300, on the other hand, is truck-mounted and designed to travel on highways, which makes it more suitable for projects that require frequent relocation between job sites. Its truck-mounted design offers faster setup and mobility, particularly on urban construction projects.
  4. Stability and Counterweight
    • P&H T250: Equipped with outriggers for stabilization
    • Grove TMS300: Designed with stabilizing outriggers and a larger counterweight for improved lifting stability
    Both cranes come with stabilizing outriggers, but the TMS300 has a larger counterweight, giving it an edge in terms of stability during lifting operations. This is particularly important when handling large loads or working in unstable ground conditions.
  5. Engine Power and Fuel Efficiency
    • P&H T250: Powered by a diesel engine designed for rough-terrain conditions
    • Grove TMS300: Powered by a truck-mounted engine, offering both on-road mobility and off-road power
    The Grove TMS300's engine is optimized for both on-road and off-road applications, making it more fuel-efficient and versatile in varying conditions. The P&H T250’s engine is specifically built for rugged off-road environments, providing excellent torque but may not offer the same level of fuel efficiency on highways as the TMS300.
Strengths and Weaknesses of Each Crane
P&H T250:
  • Strengths:
    • Excellent for off-road use and rough terrain
    • Compact size for tight job sites
    • Good for medium-duty lifting
  • Weaknesses:
    • Lower lifting capacity compared to the TMS300
    • Shorter boom reach limits height and reach for certain tasks
Grove TMS300:
  • Strengths:
    • Higher lifting capacity (30 tons)
    • Greater boom length and reach (100 feet)
    • Roadworthy design for quick relocation between job sites
  • Weaknesses:
    • Larger footprint may limit access to narrow job sites
    • Less suited for extremely rough terrains compared to the P&H T250
Choosing Between the P&H T250 and Grove TMS300
When deciding between the P&H T250 and Grove TMS300, the key factors to consider are the nature of the projects you’re working on and the terrain conditions. If your work primarily involves heavy lifting on uneven terrain, the P&H T250's rugged off-road capabilities may be a better fit. Its compact design and durable construction make it well-suited for outdoor and rural projects.
However, if your projects require a crane with greater reach, lifting capacity, and mobility between job sites, the Grove TMS300 is likely the better option. Its roadworthy design allows for faster transport between construction sites, while its larger lifting capacity and boom length give it the edge in handling larger, more complex lifts.
Conclusion
Both the P&H T250 and Grove TMS300 are excellent choices for different types of lifting operations, with each offering its own advantages depending on the job requirements. By understanding their unique strengths and weaknesses, operators can make an informed decision based on lifting capacity, reach, mobility, and the type of terrain encountered. Whether you prioritize off-road capabilities or the convenience of road travel, both cranes provide the reliability and performance needed for heavy lifting tasks in a variety of industries.
We sell 3 types:
1. Brand-new excavators.
2. Refurbished excavators for rental business, in bulk.
3. Excavators sold by original owners
https://www.facebook.com/ExcavatorSalesman
https://www.youtube.com/@ExcavatorSalesman
Whatsapp/Line: +66989793448 Wechat: waji8243
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Causes and Consequences of Crane Tipping MikePhua 0 4 3 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  The Importance of Crane Manuals for Safe and Efficient Operations MikePhua 0 4 4 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Crane for Your Operation in 2025 MikePhua 0 4 5 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu D155 vs CAT D8R: A Comparison of Two Iconic Dozers MikePhua 0 4 7 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Commercial Truck Crane and Intermountain Transport Jacket Patches MikePhua 0 4 7 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hitachi ZX240-3 vs Caterpillar 323DL Excavator Comparison MikePhua 0 4 8 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Little Giant 1242 Crane: Overview and Insights MikePhua 0 8 Today, 03:46 AM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Crane Size for Lifting Tracks MikePhua 0 4 Today, 03:39 AM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Grove GMK 5165: A Powerful Addition to Amquip’s Crane Fleet MikePhua 0 4 Yesterday, 08:22 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Can a 1972 Pettibone Crane Safely Lift Lock Blocks for Ranch Construction MikePhua 0 4 Yesterday, 08:05 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Grove RT745 Rough Terrain Crane Serial Number Identification and Field Legacy MikePhua 0 4 Yesterday, 06:53 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Mobile Crane Tags and Title: What You Need to Know MikePhua 0 4 Yesterday, 05:44 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  The New York Crane Saga and Lessons in Oversight, Engineering, and Accountability MikePhua 0 4 Yesterday, 05:36 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Understanding the KMK5090: A Versatile Heavy Lift Crane MikePhua 0 4 Yesterday, 03:08 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Crane for Cabin and Shop Projects MikePhua 0 5 09-19-2025, 11:52 PM
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)