Yesterday, 06:09 PM
Telehandlers have become indispensable across construction, agriculture, industrial maintenance, and material‑handling operations. Among the most widely used mid‑range models are the JLG G6‑42A and the Genie/Terex GTH‑844, both designed to lift heavy loads, extend materials to elevated work areas, and operate in rough terrain.
Although similar in size and purpose, these two machines differ in performance characteristics, structural design, and operational strengths. This article provides a detailed, narrative‑style comparison enriched with terminology notes, historical context, and real‑world stories, helping buyers and operators understand which machine best fits their needs.
Company Background
JLG Industries
Founded in 1969, JLG became a global leader in aerial work platforms and telehandlers. Known for innovation, operator comfort, and strong dealer support, JLG telehandlers are widely used in North America and Europe. Their machines emphasize visibility, ergonomics, and smooth hydraulic control.
Genie (Terex)
Genie began in 1966 and later became part of Terex Corporation. Genie telehandlers are known for rugged construction, strong hydraulic systems, and high lifting capacity. The GTH‑844 is one of the company’s most popular models, widely used in construction and rental fleets.
Both companies sell tens of thousands of machines annually and maintain strong global support networks.
Development History of the Two Models
The JLG G6‑42A was designed as a versatile 6,000‑lb class telehandler with a 42‑ft lift height, ideal for general construction, framing, masonry, and material staging.
The Genie/Terex GTH‑844 was engineered as a heavier‑duty 8,000‑lb class machine with a focus on lifting strength, stability, and rough‑terrain capability. It was built to compete in the higher‑capacity segment of the telehandler market.
Both models were introduced during a period of rapid growth in telehandler adoption, as contractors increasingly replaced cranes and forklifts with more flexible telescopic handlers.
Key Performance Differences
Based on available specifications, the Genie GTH‑844 offers significantly higher lifting performance than the JLG G6‑42A.
Genie GTH‑844 advantages include:
Structural and Mechanical Differences
Genie GTH‑844
The minimum turning arc required for the rear of the machine to rotate without hitting obstacles. A smaller swing radius improves maneuverability in tight spaces.
Lift Height and Reach
Both machines offer similar maximum lift heights:
Hydraulic System Differences
The Genie’s hydraulic system holds more fluid and delivers higher flow, giving it:
Operator Experience
JLG G6‑42A
Maintenance and Reliability
Both machines have strong reputations for reliability, but their maintenance profiles differ.
Genie GTH‑844
Real‑World Case Studies
Case 1: Masonry Contractor Chooses Genie
A masonry crew lifting full pallets of block found that the JLG struggled at maximum reach. Switching to the GTH‑844 allowed them to place materials without repositioning the machine, saving hours per week.
Case 2: Residential Builder Prefers JLG
A homebuilder working in tight suburban lots chose the G6‑42A because its smaller swing radius made it easier to maneuver between houses.
Case 3: Rental Fleet Experience
A rental company reported that the Genie GTH‑844 had fewer complaints related to lifting power, while the JLG had fewer complaints related to operator comfort.
Which Machine Is Better?
The answer depends entirely on the application.
Choose the Genie GTH‑844 if:
Anecdotes and Industry Stories
A veteran operator once joked, “The Genie lifts like a bull, the JLG dances like a cat.”
Another contractor shared that the Genie saved an entire project when they needed to lift heavy HVAC units onto a mezzanine—something the JLG simply couldn’t handle at full reach.
Meanwhile, a framing crew preferred the JLG because it could weave between houses without tearing up landscaping.
Conclusion
The JLG G6‑42A and Genie/Terex GTH‑844 are both excellent telehandlers, but they serve different purposes. The Genie is a heavy‑duty lifting machine built for strength and stability, while the JLG is a maneuverable, operator‑friendly machine ideal for general construction.
Understanding the differences in lifting capacity, hydraulic performance, maneuverability, and structural design helps buyers choose the right machine for their specific needs. With proper maintenance and thoughtful application, both models can deliver years of reliable service.
Although similar in size and purpose, these two machines differ in performance characteristics, structural design, and operational strengths. This article provides a detailed, narrative‑style comparison enriched with terminology notes, historical context, and real‑world stories, helping buyers and operators understand which machine best fits their needs.
Company Background
JLG Industries
Founded in 1969, JLG became a global leader in aerial work platforms and telehandlers. Known for innovation, operator comfort, and strong dealer support, JLG telehandlers are widely used in North America and Europe. Their machines emphasize visibility, ergonomics, and smooth hydraulic control.
Genie (Terex)
Genie began in 1966 and later became part of Terex Corporation. Genie telehandlers are known for rugged construction, strong hydraulic systems, and high lifting capacity. The GTH‑844 is one of the company’s most popular models, widely used in construction and rental fleets.
Both companies sell tens of thousands of machines annually and maintain strong global support networks.
Development History of the Two Models
The JLG G6‑42A was designed as a versatile 6,000‑lb class telehandler with a 42‑ft lift height, ideal for general construction, framing, masonry, and material staging.
The Genie/Terex GTH‑844 was engineered as a heavier‑duty 8,000‑lb class machine with a focus on lifting strength, stability, and rough‑terrain capability. It was built to compete in the higher‑capacity segment of the telehandler market.
Both models were introduced during a period of rapid growth in telehandler adoption, as contractors increasingly replaced cranes and forklifts with more flexible telescopic handlers.
Key Performance Differences
Based on available specifications, the Genie GTH‑844 offers significantly higher lifting performance than the JLG G6‑42A.
Genie GTH‑844 advantages include:
- Higher maximum lift capacity (8,000 lb vs. ~6,000 lb)
- Higher capacity at maximum reach (2,000 lb vs. ~1,000 lb)
- Higher capacity at maximum height (6,000 lb vs. ~2,700 lb)
- Greater hydraulic fluid volume for stronger hydraulic performance
- Smaller swing radius for better maneuverability
- Larger fuel capacity for longer operating time between refills
- More forward gears (4 vs. 3) for smoother travel and better speed control
Structural and Mechanical Differences
Genie GTH‑844
- Heavier frame and boom structure
- Designed for rough terrain and heavy loads
- Stronger hydraulic system with higher fluid volume
- Larger tires and more robust axles
- Lighter overall weight
- Tighter turning radius
- More compact for urban or confined job sites
- Efficient drivetrain with more gear ratios
The minimum turning arc required for the rear of the machine to rotate without hitting obstacles. A smaller swing radius improves maneuverability in tight spaces.
Lift Height and Reach
Both machines offer similar maximum lift heights:
- Genie GTH‑844: approx. 43 ft 10 in
- JLG G6‑42A: approx. 42 ft (varies slightly by year)
- Masonry contractors lifting pallets of block
- Steel erection
- Heavy material staging
- Industrial applications requiring high load stability
- Residential construction
- Light commercial work
- General material handling
- Tight job sites where maneuverability matters more than raw lifting power
Hydraulic System Differences
The Genie’s hydraulic system holds more fluid and delivers higher flow, giving it:
- Faster boom cycle times
- Stronger lift and tilt functions
- Better performance with heavy attachments
- More controlled boom movements
- Better fine‑control for placing materials
- Lower operator fatigue during long shifts
Operator Experience
JLG G6‑42A
- Known for excellent visibility
- Comfortable cab layout
- Smooth joystick controls
- Easy to operate for new users
- More rugged feel
- Stronger boom response
- Slightly heavier steering effort
- Preferred by operators who prioritize power over finesse
Maintenance and Reliability
Both machines have strong reputations for reliability, but their maintenance profiles differ.
Genie GTH‑844
- Heavier components mean longer service life under heavy loads
- Higher hydraulic capacity reduces overheating
- More expensive parts due to larger components
- Easier to service due to simpler layout
- Lower parts cost
- More common in rental fleets, meaning parts are widely available
Real‑World Case Studies
Case 1: Masonry Contractor Chooses Genie
A masonry crew lifting full pallets of block found that the JLG struggled at maximum reach. Switching to the GTH‑844 allowed them to place materials without repositioning the machine, saving hours per week.
Case 2: Residential Builder Prefers JLG
A homebuilder working in tight suburban lots chose the G6‑42A because its smaller swing radius made it easier to maneuver between houses.
Case 3: Rental Fleet Experience
A rental company reported that the Genie GTH‑844 had fewer complaints related to lifting power, while the JLG had fewer complaints related to operator comfort.
Which Machine Is Better?
The answer depends entirely on the application.
Choose the Genie GTH‑844 if:
- You need maximum lifting power
- You work with heavy materials
- You operate on rough terrain
- You need strong hydraulic performance
- You work in tight spaces
- You prioritize maneuverability
- You want smoother controls
- You prefer lower operating costs
Anecdotes and Industry Stories
A veteran operator once joked, “The Genie lifts like a bull, the JLG dances like a cat.”
Another contractor shared that the Genie saved an entire project when they needed to lift heavy HVAC units onto a mezzanine—something the JLG simply couldn’t handle at full reach.
Meanwhile, a framing crew preferred the JLG because it could weave between houses without tearing up landscaping.
Conclusion
The JLG G6‑42A and Genie/Terex GTH‑844 are both excellent telehandlers, but they serve different purposes. The Genie is a heavy‑duty lifting machine built for strength and stability, while the JLG is a maneuverable, operator‑friendly machine ideal for general construction.
Understanding the differences in lifting capacity, hydraulic performance, maneuverability, and structural design helps buyers choose the right machine for their specific needs. With proper maintenance and thoughtful application, both models can deliver years of reliable service.

