Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Cat D11R and D10N Size Comparison
#1
The Caterpillar D11R and D10N represent two of the most iconic large dozers ever built, machines that symbolize the peak of earthmoving power and engineering. Seeing them side by side highlights the dramatic scale difference between Caterpillar’s upper‑tier dozer classes. While both machines are giants in their own right, the D11R stands in a category of its own, designed for the most demanding mining and heavy ripping environments. The D10N, although smaller, remains a formidable machine widely used in quarries, land development, and large civil projects.
Development Background of the D10 and D11 Series
Caterpillar revolutionized the dozer market in 1977 with the introduction of the D10, the first production dozer to use the elevated‑sprocket design. This innovation improved durability, reduced shock loads to the final drives, and set a new standard for crawler tractor engineering. The D10N, introduced in the late 1980s, refined the platform with improved hydraulics, better operator comfort, and enhanced structural strength.
The D11 series emerged as Caterpillar’s answer to the mining industry’s demand for even larger machines. The D11N debuted in the mid‑1980s, followed by the D11R in the 1990s. These machines became essential tools in large open‑pit mines, where their massive blades and powerful rippers could move enormous volumes of material.
Sales data from the era shows that the D10 and D11 families became some of Caterpillar’s most successful large dozer lines, dominating the mining and heavy construction sectors worldwide.
Size and Power Differences
The size comparison between the D11R and D10N is striking. The D11R is significantly taller, wider, and heavier, with a blade capacity far exceeding that of the D10N. This difference is not merely cosmetic—it reflects the machines’ intended roles.
Terminology notes:
  • Elevated sprocket: A design where the drive sprocket is raised above the track frame to reduce shock loads.
  • Ripper: A large shank used to break rock or compacted soil.
  • Blade capacity: The volume of material a blade can push in a single pass.
  • Operating weight: The total weight of the machine including fluids and attachments.
The D11R’s operating weight can exceed 230,000 pounds, while the D10N typically falls in the 150,000–170,000‑pound range. The horsepower difference is equally dramatic, with the D11R producing well over 850 horsepower compared to the D10N’s roughly 600 horsepower.
Design Features That Define Each Machine
The D11R incorporates several features that distinguish it from the D10N:
  • A larger and more robust mainframe
  • A massive U‑blade capable of moving huge loads
  • A multi‑shank or single‑shank ripper designed for deep rock penetration
  • A spacious cab with improved visibility and operator comfort
  • Reinforced undercarriage components for extreme duty cycles
The D10N, while smaller, shares many of the same design philosophies:
  • Elevated‑sprocket undercarriage
  • Strong Z‑bar blade linkage
  • Durable hydraulic systems
  • Excellent balance between power and maneuverability
The D10N’s size makes it more versatile for contractors who need a powerful machine without the logistical challenges of transporting a D11.
Field Impressions and Operator Experiences
Operators who have worked around both machines often describe the D11R as “a mountain on tracks.” Standing next to one emphasizes its sheer scale—photos rarely do it justice. The D10N, by comparison, looks almost compact, even though it is larger than most dozers ever built.
One operator recalled the first time he climbed onto a D11R, describing the experience as “walking up the side of a building.” Another noted that the D10N, despite being smaller, was still powerful enough to push over mature trees and rip through hardpan with ease.
These impressions highlight the psychological impact of working around ultra‑large equipment—machines that reshape landscapes with every pass.
Caterpillar Company Background
Caterpillar has been a global leader in heavy equipment manufacturing for nearly a century. The company’s dozer lineup has evolved continuously, with each generation incorporating new technologies, stronger materials, and improved operator environments.
The D10 and D11 series played a major role in establishing Caterpillar’s dominance in the mining and large‑scale earthmoving industries. Their elevated‑sprocket design became a signature feature, influencing the entire industry and setting Caterpillar apart from competitors.
Practical Considerations for Owners and Operators
  • The D11R requires specialized transport equipment due to its size.
  • Maintenance costs scale with machine size—undercarriage components for a D11R are significantly more expensive than those for a D10N.
  • The D10N offers a balance of power and mobility suitable for contractors who do not require the extreme capabilities of a D11.
  • Both machines benefit from regular undercarriage inspections due to the high loads placed on track components.
  • Ripper shank wear should be monitored closely, especially in abrasive rock environments.
Conclusion
The Caterpillar D11R and D10N represent two distinct tiers of heavy‑duty earthmoving capability. While the D10N is a powerful and versatile machine, the D11R stands in a class of its own, engineered for the most demanding mining and ripping applications. Seeing the two machines side by side underscores the dramatic scale difference and highlights Caterpillar’s engineering achievements across multiple decades. Both machines have earned their place in heavy equipment history, each serving a unique role in shaping the modern earthmoving industry.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Cat D11R and D10N Size Comparison - by MikePhua - 3 hours ago

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Choosing the Right Excavator Size Depends on Hauling Limits, Job Scope, and Terrain MikePhua 0 119 11-19-2025, 03:40 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Fast vs Slow Speed in Construction Equipment: A Detailed Comparison MikePhua 0 116 11-13-2025, 11:23 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Does Excavator Width Change with Track Pad Size MikePhua 0 105 10-27-2025, 08:08 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  CAT D10R vs. the Mountain of Rock: A Performance Comparison MikePhua 0 99 10-27-2025, 06:20 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar D8, D9, and D10 Dozers: A Comparison of Heavy Equipment Giants MikePhua 0 158 10-23-2025, 02:54 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Fuel Consumption and Machine Size in Skid Steer Selection MikePhua 0 105 10-23-2025, 11:32 AM
Last Post: MikePhua
  T86 vs 333G: A Comparison of Two Popular Compact Track Loaders MikePhua 0 123 10-22-2025, 05:32 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hitachi EX100-2 vs. John Deere 490E Excavators: A Comparison of Two Robust Machines MikePhua 0 112 10-22-2025, 05:16 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Takeuchi TB290 vs. CAT 308-2CR: A Comparison of Two Leading Mini Excavators MikePhua 0 108 10-21-2025, 11:56 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Kobelco SK55SRX vs Takeuchi TB260: A Comparison of Compact Excavators MikePhua 0 116 10-21-2025, 11:55 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Excavator Size for Your Project MikePhua 0 111 10-21-2025, 07:12 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Case 9060, Sumitomo 2800, and Link-Belt Excavators: A Comparison of Reliability and Performance MikePhua 0 110 10-21-2025, 06:30 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Size and Brand of Excavator MikePhua 0 125 10-21-2025, 02:41 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Is a 120-size excavator the right choice for land development MikePhua 0 127 10-20-2025, 01:57 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Best Skid Steer: A Comparison of Top Brands MikePhua 0 86 10-18-2025, 02:14 PM
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)