Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username/Email:
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 43
» Latest member: Bob808
» Forum threads: 17,977
» Forum posts: 17,979

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 200 online users.
» 1 Member(s) | 195 Guest(s)
Bing, ChatGPT, Facebook, Google, MikePhua

Latest Threads
Proper AC Charging Proced...
Forum: Operator Talking
Last Post: MikePhua
8 minutes ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 1
Fiat-Allis 16B: A Detaile...
Forum: Operator Talking
Last Post: MikePhua
8 minutes ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 1
Choosing the Best 5 to 7 ...
Forum: Operator Talking
Last Post: MikePhua
9 minutes ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 1
Understanding the Wiring ...
Forum: Operator Talking
Last Post: MikePhua
9 minutes ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 1
How to Read and Understan...
Forum: Excavator Repair Shop & Troubleshooting
Last Post: MikePhua
10 minutes ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 1
Understanding the Differe...
Forum: Operator Talking
Last Post: MikePhua
10 minutes ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 1
Heavy Black Smoke from a ...
Forum: Excavator Repair Shop & Troubleshooting
Last Post: MikePhua
11 minutes ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 1
Troubleshooting Takeuchi ...
Forum: Excavator Repair Shop & Troubleshooting
Last Post: MikePhua
11 minutes ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 1
Excavator Demolition Inci...
Forum: Operator Talking
Last Post: MikePhua
12 minutes ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 1
Is a Forestry Chipper Cos...
Forum: Farming, Landscaping, Forestry Industry Forum
Last Post: MikePhua
12 minutes ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 1

 
  Komatsu vs. Doosan Excavator User Report
Posted by: MikePhua - 06-25-2025, 05:42 PM - Forum: Operator Talking - No Replies

This report shares my experience with various models of excavators, including Komatsu PC200-3, Komatsu PC220-6, PC220-7, PC240LC-8, and Doosan DH220LC-V. The report highlights the advantages and disadvantages of these machines and compares their performance in different scenarios.
First Machine: Komatsu PC200-3
14 years ago, I purchased my first Komatsu excavator, the PC200-3, as a second-hand machine for 450,000 RMB. It had around 3000 hours of usage. Although I later discovered that it had been refurbished, the machine performed flawlessly. However, an issue arose when the fan belt was damaged, causing the engine to overheat. After replacing the belt, the machine worked fine for another week before the engine completely failed. Due to limited repair knowledge and high repair costs, the engine was deemed a total loss. The manufacturer quoted a price of 380,000 RMB for a new engine, but I found a more affordable solution by replacing it with a Yuchai engine for just 30,000 RMB, including installation. After the replacement, the machine ran smoothly, and it was hard to tell that the engine had been replaced!
Evaluation:

  • Pros: The PC200-3 impressed me with its durability and high-quality Japanese engineering.
  • Cons: Although the engine replacement solved the problem, the high maintenance costs raised concerns.
Second Machine: Daewoo DH220LC-V
After the issues with the PC200-3, I decided to purchase a new machine. Initially, I considered Komatsu again but found that the price of the PC220 was around 900,000 RMB, which was out of my budget. I then turned to Japanese brands like Hitachi, but they were also too expensive. Eventually, I decided to purchase a Daewoo DH220LC-V for 670,000 RMB, a more budget-friendly option. Upon recommendation from a sales representative, I ended up buying the Daewoo.
Currently, the Daewoo DH220LC-V has 16,000 hours of use and is 10 years old. It has not undergone any major repairs and still retains 90% of its original paintwork. I expect it to reach 20,000 hours without needing significant repairs. Although the machine is a bit slower now, it still delivers solid performance.
Evaluation:
  • Pros: Reliable and cost-effective, with low maintenance requirements.
  • Cons: Slightly slower speed, but still performs well overall.
Komatsu PC220 Series: PC220-6 and PC220-7
After the Daewoo, I bought Komatsu PC220-6 and PC220-7 models. The PC220-6 is a well-built machine, and after 15,000 hours of operation, there are no significant issues with the hydraulic system. However, after 12,000 hours of use in a quarry, the undercarriage required significant repairs, with all the rollers needing replacement.
The PC220-7 had similar issues to the PC220-6 but also developed some cracks in the boom and arm. Although not critical, it is worth noting.
Evaluation:
  • Pros: Reliable hydraulic system, suitable for long hours of work.
  • Cons: Undercarriage wear and arm cracks after extended use.
Komatsu PC240LC-8
I also purchased the Komatsu PC240LC-8, which features an electronic fuel injection engine, offering more power compared to other 240-class excavators. However, this comes at a cost: the fuel consumption is high. In P-mode, when excavating tough materials, the fuel consumption can reach 28.6 liters per hour.
The main advantage of the PC240LC-8 is its consistent performance, handling both soft and hard ground efficiently. It is a versatile machine, capable of handling a wide range of tasks with ease.
Evaluation:
  • Pros: Powerful engine and versatile performance, suitable for heavy-duty tasks.
  • Cons: High fuel consumption, especially in P-mode. The hydraulic cylinders tend to discolor, affecting the machine's appearance, although it doesn't impact functionality. Additionally, the cooling system is complex and expensive to repair if damaged.
Fuel Consumption and Maintenance of Komatsu PC240LC-8
The fuel consumption of the PC240LC-8 has been a concern, especially in P-mode, where it consumes fuel rapidly. Despite the increased fuel consumption, the PC240LC-8 offers stable and reliable performance, making it suitable for demanding work environments. The main drawback is the high cost of maintaining certain components, such as the hydraulic cylinders and high-pressure hoses, which tend to fail after 5000 hours of use.
Evaluation:
  • Pros: Excellent performance and power, with great versatility for various tasks.
  • Cons: High fuel consumption, particularly in demanding conditions. Hydraulic cylinders are prone to discoloration, and high-pressure hoses need frequent replacement.
Conclusion
The Komatsu PC240LC-8, despite its higher fuel consumption, remains a strong contender in terms of power and reliability. Its versatility makes it suitable for a wide range of tasks, though maintenance costs, particularly for hydraulic components, can add up over time. Overall, Komatsu excavators are known for their durability and performance, but fuel consumption and certain component failures need to be carefully managed. On the other hand, the Daewoo DH220LC-V has proven to be a cost-effective and reliable machine, with lower maintenance requirements and a longer service life.

Print this item

  Longgong 855B Rock King Wheel Loader 1000-Hour Usage Report
Posted by: MikePhua - 06-25-2025, 05:42 PM - Forum: Operator Talking - No Replies

I purchased the Longgong 855B Rock King wheel loader at the end of November 2009. After more than six months of use, and with just over 1000 hours of operation, I would like to share my insights on the machine’s pros and cons based on my experience.
Advantages

  1. Durability and Build Quality:
    The 855B is part of the Rock King series, which gives the loader a solid, durable feel. The overall design ensures it can handle tough work conditions with ease.
  2. Stability During Operations:
    When performing tasks such as earth loading, the machine seldom experiences “tail tipping”. The rear counterweight is well-balanced, helping maintain stability during heavy-duty operations.
  3. Excellent Visibility:
    The driving cab features a panoramic glass design, providing outstanding visibility. This feature significantly enhances the operator’s ability to navigate and monitor surroundings, increasing safety and comfort.
Disadvantages
  1. Poor Interior Design and Sealing:
    The cabin interior quality is below par, with poor sealing. After only a few hours of operation, screws on the dashboard became loose and couldn’t be tightened. Additionally, the doors do not seal properly, causing them to rattle when closed.
  2. Inefficient Bucket Design:
    The bucket's cutting edge protector is poorly designed. The teeth extend only about 10 cm beyond the protector, making it harder to cut into soil piles effectively. After a few hours of use, I removed the protector and plan to weld a new one once I have accumulated some operating hours.
  3. Heavy Control Levers:
    I’ve tested several Longgong loaders, and the control levers tend to be heavy, which is a common issue across their range. This can make operation tiring during long hours of use.
  4. Difficult Maintenance:
    The engine hood’s side doors open upwards, making routine maintenance and repairs somewhat inconvenient. It’s not the most practical design for easy access.
Maintenance Issues
Around the 500-hour mark, I noticed a slight oil leak from the steering cylinder’s inlet pipe. By the 800-hour mark, the multi-way valve began leaking oil, but it was addressed by after-sales service. At just over 900 hours, the transmission oil pressure gauge developed a leak. The after-sales team informed me that the gauge was an electronic component and wasn’t covered by the warranty, which expired after three months. I purchased a replacement for 45 yuan and installed it myself.
Conclusion
In summary, the Longgong 855B Rock King is a powerful and durable loader, especially suitable for heavy-duty applications. While there are some areas for improvement, such as the interior quality, hydraulic control levers, and design for ease of maintenance, the machine has generally proven to be reliable. For those considering this model, I’d suggest keeping an eye on the maintenance issues that may arise after the first few hundred hours. However, overall, it’s a solid performer.

Print this item

  Longgong LG850 Wheel Loader User Review
Posted by: MikePhua - 06-25-2025, 05:40 PM - Forum: Operator Talking - No Replies

I have used three Longgong LG850 wheel loaders over the years, bought in 2007, 2008, and 2009. Below is a summary of my experience with these machines, covering their performance, issues, and maintenance.
General Overview

  • Machine 1 (purchased in 2007): Currently has over 7000 hours of operation.
  • Machine 2 (purchased in 2008): Has 4000 hours of use.
  • Machine 3 (purchased in 2009): Has just over 1000 hours.
All three machines have a weight of 15.8 tons, and a common issue across all is the “rear tipping” phenomenon. Despite minor exterior differences, all the machines share a similar look. Notably, Machine 1 has a unique intake system compared to the others, and its work device features two crossbeams instead of one, as is standard on new models.
Machine 1 has had an issue with cracks forming at the connection between the boom and the crossbeam. Machines 2 and 3 have been modified to extend the connection, and no further issues have arisen.
Engine
All three machines are equipped with Weichai engines:
  • Machines 1 and 2 use the WD615 engine.
  • Machine 3 is fitted with the WD10, which complies with Euro III emissions standards. The WD10 has smaller bore and stroke dimensions, but maintains the same output of 162 kW, resulting in lower fuel consumption.
  • Machine 1 has experienced several issues, including oil leaks around the cylinder head and corrosion at the water seals. The turbocharger is positioned very close to the cylinder head, making repairs difficult. I had to replace several water seals and the fuel injection pump, which was a cumbersome process. During cold starts, the machine requires extra throttle to avoid stalling, and it emits white smoke before stabilizing.
  • Machine 2 has faced issues with water seal leaks and an electronic valve failure, which was converted to a manual valve. The starter motor also needed replacement at one point.
  • Machine 3 had problems with its electronic valve and had to replace a turbocharger gasket.
Dual Transmission System
  • Machine 1's dual transmission system is still functioning well.
  • Machine 2 required repairs after about 3000 hours of operation due to damage to the torque converter bearings. The bearings used were from ZWZ.
  • Machine 3 felt slower to respond after shifting, especially when starting from a standstill.
Drive Axles
  • Machine 1 has required numerous repairs to its front axle. The latest repair may have left the axle casing bolts inadequately tightened, leading to a minor oil leak. The half-axle was once broken, and the brake system has had recurring oil leaks. The power booster pump has been replaced. The tires from Henan Fengshen lasted long but are now worn down, and I replaced them with refurbished tires.
  • Machine 2 experienced repeated issues with the planetary gears in the front axle. The gears broke multiple times within days, necessitating removal of the tires for repair.
  • Machine 3 has not had issues with the axles up to now.
Hydraulic System
The hydraulic system is a major concern across all three machines. The hydraulic pipe layout is complicated, with many parts interfering with each other, leading to frequent leaks.
  • Machine 1 and 2 use Jinan Hydraulic Factory pumps, while Machine 3 uses Longgong’s own hydraulic pumps. The latter has been functioning well so far.
  • Machine 1 had all four hydraulic cylinders wear out, and I had to replace them. The first replacement cylinders also wore out quickly. Machine 2 had the boom hydraulic seals replaced.
  • Machine 1's hydraulic return line disconnected twice, draining all the hydraulic oil, which was a painful experience. Also, the steering system and valve block started leaking oil shortly after they were replaced.
Additional Issues
  • Machine 1 has an ongoing issue with the swing bucket’s top pin breaking frequently.
  • The paint quality on the Longgong machines is quite good, and after cleaning, the old machines look nearly as good as new.
Summary
Overall, the Longgong LG850 wheel loader is a reliable machine, but it comes with some common issues, particularly with the hydraulic system and engine seals. The design and construction have room for improvement, especially in terms of simplifying the hydraulic layout to prevent leaks. Despite these challenges, the machines perform adequately and have shown durability in tough working conditions.
For Longgong, while the product quality is improving, there is still room to address issues in engine durability, hydraulic design, and axles to make these machines more reliable. With these improvements, Longgong can continue to improve its standing in the market.

Print this item

  Comparison of Doosan DH55 and Komatsu PC55 Excavators: A User Experience Report
Posted by: MikePhua - 06-25-2025, 05:37 PM - Forum: Operator Talking - No Replies

I’ve been using the Doosan DH55 excavator for about two weeks now, with around 150 working hours on it. Here’s my personal comparison with the Komatsu PC55 excavator, which I’ve been using for over 4 years.
Engine Performance
The engine in the Doosan DH55 is noticeably louder compared to the Komatsu PC55. Even when I push the throttle to its maximum on the Komatsu, it doesn’t generate the same level of noise as the DH55. The Doosan is definitely one of the loudest in its class.
Fuel Consumption
From my experience, the Doosan DH55 consumes more fuel than the Komatsu PC55. Although I haven’t done exact measurements, it’s clear that the DH55 is thirstier when it comes to fuel usage.
Hydraulic System
The Doosan DH55 is still new, and I haven’t installed a hammer yet, so I can’t provide a comprehensive review of its hydraulic system just yet. However, when lifting the arm, I noticed it produces a louder sound compared to the Komatsu PC55, which operates almost silently when equipped with a hammer.
Fuel Tank Capacity
The fuel tank capacity of both machines is approximately 64 liters. However, the Doosan DH55 can barely fill up even with 500 yuan worth of fuel, whereas the Komatsu PC55 can get close to a full tank with 400 yuan. This shows a clear difference in fuel efficiency between the two.
Cab Quality
The build quality of the Doosan DH55 is somewhat rough. On the first day, I cut my hand when opening the sunroof. Over time, I also noticed scratches appearing on the cab, which could be a result of poor craftsmanship. In contrast, the Komatsu PC55 has slightly better build quality, but the door locks are notoriously problematic. Out of the 12 units of Komatsu PC55 in the area, every single one has had issues with the door locks. In some cases, the locks failed completely, and owners had to resort to making their own fixes. My own machine still has a functional lock, but I have to lock it from the inside and climb out the window to lock the door, which is very inconvenient.
Track and Undercarriage
The Komatsu PC55 has a weak undercarriage. Around 3000-5000 hours, the machine frequently experienced track derailments, sometimes multiple times a day. After replacing the guide wheels and support rollers, this issue was resolved. The Doosan DH55, however, appears sturdier with thicker track plates and protective guards, suggesting that it won’t face similar issues in the future.
Bucket Durability
The Komatsu PC55 had to replace the bucket after 6000 hours due to wear and tear, with the edges becoming jagged and irregular. The Doosan DH55 bucket, on the other hand, feels quite thin, and after only 50 hours of operation on the railway, I hit a steel rail and dented the bucket. This shows that the Doosan DH55 bucket is more prone to damage in tough conditions.
Speed and Performance
In terms of speed, the Doosan DH55 is noticeably slower, especially when rotating. Even though the Komatsu PC55 has slightly slowed down over time, it’s still faster than the Doosan DH55 in most aspects. I had a technician check the hydraulics, and while everything seemed in good order, the flow rate appears a bit low. I’ve been looking into ways to boost the flow without replacing the pump, and any expert advice on this would be appreciated.
Lighting System
The lighting on the Doosan DH55 is not ideal, especially since the lights are positioned underneath the cab. This made working in the evening somewhat challenging for me. In contrast, I find the Komatsu PC55 lighting to be more effective and comfortable for night operations.
Power and Lifting Ability
In terms of raw power, the Doosan DH55 seems stronger, as it doesn’t frequently exhibit tail lift when lifting heavy loads. My father believes the Komatsu PC55 has more lifting power, but from my perspective, the Doosan performs more consistently under load.
Machine Size and Maneuverability
One obvious difference is the machine size. The Komatsu PC55 has a zero tail swing design, which makes it ideal for working in tight spaces. On the other hand, the Doosan DH55 has a conventional rear tail, which caused some issues during my early operations. A driver who tested the machine for the first time ended up scratching the rear while trying to maneuver in tight quarters. Since then, I’ve taken over driving duties.
After-Sales Service
One of the areas where Doosan excels is its after-sales service. They are very attentive and responsive to customer concerns, and they even follow up with a call after each service. In comparison, while Komatsu has a good reputation, I’ve found their customer service to be less proactive and not as customer-friendly. Doosan has definitely done a great job ensuring that their customers are satisfied.
Conclusion
Overall, both the Doosan DH55 and Komatsu PC55 have their strengths and weaknesses. The Doosan DH55 is a sturdy, powerful machine with a reliable after-sales service, but it has some issues in terms of noise, fuel efficiency, and bucket durability. The Komatsu PC55, while slightly better in terms of cab quality and operational smoothness, suffers from design flaws like unreliable door locks and weak undercarriage.
If you're looking for a machine with solid performance and good after-sales support, the Doosan DH55 might be the right choice. However, if you prioritize comfort and smooth operation, the Komatsu PC55 may still be the preferred option, despite its maintenance challenges.

Print this item

  Case 580L Backhoe Loader User Report
Posted by: MikePhua - 06-25-2025, 05:36 PM - Forum: Operator Talking - No Replies

After the year 2000, the streets of Shenyang witnessed the arrival of an eye-catching machine — the Case 580L backhoe loader (commonly known as a "two-end busy" machine). When people first saw it, it immediately drew attention, and it quickly entered the radar of the leadership at the Shenyang Water Supply Company (now part of Shenyang Water Group). A year later, the decision was made to purchase one.
In November 2001, our Case 580L arrived. At that time, there were only three Case 580Ls in Shenyang: one with our company and two with Shenyang Gas Company. The arrival of the Case 580L marked the beginning of a new era for us, thanks to its outstanding performance in several aspects.
Key Features of the Case 580L

  1. High Mobility: The machine's maximum speed reaches 40 km/h, making it perfect for quick transitions between different repair sites, greatly reducing downtime and improving work efficiency.
  2. Easy Operation: Unlike other models, the Case 580L features fewer control levers, which makes it easier to operate, reducing the time spent on repair tasks.
  3. Low Failure Rate: The machine has demonstrated minimal failure, staying reliable on the job day in and day out, which proved the initial purchase decision to be correct.
Maintenance and Repairs
During the nine years of use, while the machine performed admirably, some issues did arise. The most significant one occurred when we mistakenly used ordinary transmission oil instead of the specialized torque fluid required for the gearbox. This led to the gearbox malfunctioning after two years, requiring a repair costing over 30,000 yuan. Apart from this major issue, the repairs were generally limited to wear-and-tear parts such as the central control switch for movement and the gear shift lever.
The machine's most important component, the Cummins 4BT3.9 engine, has performed well and hasn't required any major repairs.
User Experience and Comfort
The Case 580L is equipped with a fully hydraulic steering system, making the steering wheel very light and easy to use. With just two full turns, the wheel can be fully turned, improving steering precision. The loader control lever is simple, and the excavator levers are also smooth, allowing for quick combined movements. The gear shift lever is conveniently placed on the right side and integrates with the manual clutch. Additionally, the cushioned seat offers comfort for the operator, though it cannot be fully reclined, which is a minor inconvenience during long shifts.
Modifications and Customization
To enhance the machine's usability, I made a few modifications:
  1. Audio and Video System: Originally equipped with just a radio, I upgraded the system to a DVD player with visual capabilities. The sound system was upgraded from two speakers to four, which improved the sound quality significantly. I also considered installing a subwoofer, but due to space constraints in the cab, I had to forgo it.
  2. Emergency Warning Light: I added a police-grade warning light to improve safety and visibility when the machine is in use.
Issues and Suggestions for Improvement
Although the Case 580L performed well overall, there are a few areas that could be improved:
  1. Cab Design: The cab could be better designed, especially when it comes to the seat adjustments and steering wheel position. In comparison to brands like JCB, the Case 580L lacks adjustable steering, which could offer a more comfortable driving experience.
  2. Old Engine Technology: The engine used in the Case 580L is somewhat outdated and lacks electronic control, which puts it at a disadvantage compared to more modern machines.
  3. Expensive Parts and Maintenance: All parts and maintenance materials are from the original manufacturer, which makes the overall maintenance costs higher. The lack of third-party alternatives for parts creates a significant cost burden for users.
About Case Company
Case Construction Equipment has a history spanning over 160 years, founded by J. I. Case. Initially producing steam rollers and graders, Case expanded its product line and became a full-range manufacturer of construction equipment by 1912. The company has pioneered many industry-firsts and continues to innovate and lead in the construction equipment sector. Today, Case offers over 90 models across 15 product lines, delivering reliable machinery for the most challenging construction tasks globally.
Conclusion
Overall, the Case 580L backhoe loader is an excellent and versatile piece of machinery. It offers great mobility, ease of operation, and low failure rates, making it ideal for a variety of tasks, including road repairs and small construction jobs. However, there are some areas where improvements could be made, particularly in the cab design and engine technology. The high costs of original parts also pose a challenge. Despite these drawbacks, the Case 580L is a reliable and efficient machine that gets the job done and continues to serve its purpose well. It would be great to see further improvements in future models, especially to reduce maintenance costs and enhance user comfort.

Print this item

  JCB 3CX-2T Backhoe Loader User Report
Posted by: MikePhua - 06-25-2025, 05:35 PM - Forum: Operator Talking - No Replies

The JCB 3CX-2T backhoe loader, commonly referred to as a "two-in-one" machine, is highly valued for its versatility and fast transition between tasks. It is widely used in both urban and rural settings for road construction, cable laying, power and airport projects, municipal works, farmland irrigation, rural housing construction, stone quarrying, and small-scale construction projects. In China, backhoe loaders are particularly popular for tasks such as municipal work, water and gas pipeline repairs, and small road maintenance. This report is based on the personal experience of an operator in a municipal construction unit in Linyi, Shandong Province, and offers valuable insights into the performance of this machine.
The JCB 3CX-2T is the second backhoe loader of its kind in the region, purchased in October 2004 for 870,000 CNY through a trade-in. The machine had only 5 operating hours when it was first delivered. Since then, the operator, relying on experience with excavators and loaders, gradually became proficient with the equipment. Over time, the machine has been operated by a total of 8 different people in the unit, with the operator taking primary responsibility for operation and maintenance.
Equipment Configuration

  • Engine: The backhoe is equipped with a 4-cylinder turbocharged 95-horsepower Perkins engine.
  • Tires: It has four vacuum tires, with Goodyear tires on the front and other imported tires on the rear.
  • Lighting: All eight working lights are from Hella Germany, providing excellent brightness.
  • Hydraulic System: The rear digging arm is capable of side-shifting (though not powered by a chain system).
  • Attachments: The machine is also equipped with a 360° hydraulic breaker.
However, one drawback noted by the operator is the lack of a complete set of tools. The machine only came with a grease gun, pressure gauge, and tire removal socket—missing basic tools like wrenches, which the operator feels would have made a significant difference in user experience.
Operating Experience
  • The backhoe loader has proven highly efficient for larger construction projects. It excels at tasks such as road surface repair, making it ideal for small to medium-scale jobs.
  • While loader operations are comfortable, operating the excavator part without pilot controls causes some fatigue due to the lack of assistive features.
  • Its ability to easily move between tasks and projects makes it particularly useful in urban areas where space is limited.
Advantages of the JCB 3CX-2T
  1. Effective Air Conditioning: The air conditioning system has several vents that provide a good cooling effect. The compressor is from Shanghai Yichu.
  2. Good Cabin Insulation: The cabin's insulation is effective, allowing operators to work with the breaker without excessive noise.
  3. Comfortable Seat: Initially lacking a headrest, the operator added one from Steyr, improving comfort during long shifts.
  4. Effective Shock Absorption: The shock-absorbing features are excellent, although the seat back could not be fully reclined due to the operating arm's limitations.
  5. Adjustable Steering: The steering wheel is adjustable, and there is a storage compartment with an air vent—convenient for storing drinks in the summer.
  6. Handbrake and Control Handles: The handbrake and loader control handles come with interlock buttons, making operation more user-friendly. The electronic gearshift is smooth and efficient.
  7. Spacious Cabin: The cabin is spacious enough to fit seven people at once, a rarity for such machines.
  8. Sound System: Although the machine didn’t come with a radio, the operator installed a cassette player, which works well with the existing standard plugs.
Common Issues and Maintenance
Like any piece of equipment, the JCB 3CX-2T has encountered several issues over the years, many of which stem from either manufacturing defects or improper operation. Below are the reported problems:
  1. Front Wheel Bearing Cover: After only a few days of use, the front wheel bearing cover came off, and there were leaks in the oil lines of the boom. Additionally, the rear axle bolts loosened.
  2. Hydraulic Breaker: The hydraulic breaker caused significant vibration, damaging the hydraulic oil cooler and leading to oil leakage. The unit tried to resolve this, but some seepage persists.
  3. Transmission Leaks: The transmission has experienced consistent oil leaks. Additionally, the unit’s diesel fuel quality was poor, which damaged the fuel pump. This issue required a replacement that was air-shipped from Singapore.
  4. Rainwater in Exhaust Pipe: Due to a lack of proper indoor storage, rainwater often entered through the exhaust pipe and caused engine starting issues. This also led to large amounts of black liquid being expelled when the machine started, staining the engine cover.
  5. Muffler Corrosion: The muffler corroded due to water collecting at the top during rain. The muffler had to be replaced, costing 1,600 CNY.
  6. Door Damage: The left side door was damaged by a colleague operating another machine. The original door was quoted at over 16,000 CNY, but it took over a year for a replacement to arrive.
  7. Tire Wear: The machine's front wheel turning radius caused significant tire wear. Tires had to be replaced every two years, and the tire removal process proved difficult. Eventually, the operator switched to steel-rimmed tires.
  8. Electrical Issues: Several electrical components have failed, including the blower fan. After three years, the fan had to be replaced, but the new fan, while cheaper, didn’t perform as well.
  9. Broken Tail Light: The tail light was damaged during the first use and required replacement multiple times due to poor durability. The main headlights also suffered from electrical malfunctions.
  10. Miscellaneous Design Flaws: The wiper controls were prone to breaking, and the air conditioning control panel required makeshift repairs using wire, indicating poor attention to design details.
Conclusion
Overall, the JCB 3CX-2T is a reliable backhoe loader for small and medium-sized tasks, especially in urban environments where its mobility and multifunctionality prove useful. However, the machine does face a few challenges in terms of maintenance, durability of components, and the cost of spare parts, which can be relatively high. While the JCB 3CX-2T excels in terms of its versatility and operator comfort, there are areas, particularly related to design quality and component longevity, that could see improvement. It’s hoped that future models will address these issues to provide an even more reliable and cost-effective option for operators.

Print this item

  Liugong 220L Excavator User Report
Posted by: MikePhua - 06-25-2025, 05:34 PM - Forum: Operator Talking - No Replies

This report summarizes the usage of a Liugong 220L excavator, purchased in May 2006 for 620,000 CNY, and currently has nearly 8000 operational hours. The machine has been primarily used for earthmoving tasks, and it has been maintained according to the standard operating and maintenance procedures. Below is a summary of its performance, highlighting both the advantages and issues encountered during its use, which may serve as a useful reference for those considering purchasing this model.
Advantages

  1. Powerful Engine and Excellent Engine Quality
    The excavator is equipped with a Cummins engine with 147 horsepower, which performs well even at full throttle without exceeding 20 liters per hour in fuel consumption. Although the oil used is no longer the original brand, the engine has not experienced any major issues.
  2. Reliable Hydraulic System
    The machine uses a Japan Kawasaki hydraulic pump and a Japan Chuanqi rotation pump. The hydraulic oil has been replaced only once, and the system has remained trouble-free. Regular maintenance, including changing the hydraulic and pilot filters, has kept the system running smoothly.
  3. Exceptional Digging Power, Outperforming Imported Brands
    Among the 220-series excavators, the Liugong 220L boasts the best digging power. Compared to the Caterpillar 320C, the Liugong 220L has superior excavation strength, making it a clear winner in its class.
  4. Fast Swing Speed
    One of the standout features of the Liugong 220L is its fast swing speed, offering excellent handling and a satisfying operator experience. However, the lack of a hydraulic damping system can make it challenging for less experienced operators to control the swing, particularly when turning sharply.
  5. Outstanding Climbing Ability
    The Liugong 220L shows impressive performance when working on inclines. While European and Japanese brands may struggle in certain areas, the Liugong machine can easily handle these spots, showcasing its excellent terrain adaptability.
Disadvantages
  1. Low-Quality Original Bucket
    At around 4000 hours, the original bucket became worn and had to be repaired multiple times. Eventually, a new bucket was purchased, and the 1.1 cubic meter original bucket cost a staggering 12,000 CNY. The quality of the original bucket was deemed subpar.
  2. Track Durability Issues
    Despite using imported tracks, the track hardness was insufficient. After about 2000 hours, the machine began experiencing frequent track dragging issues, and by 4000 hours, the gears showed significant wear. This reveals that even imported parts may not always meet high standards.
  3. Inefficient Toolbox Design
    The toolbox design is poor, with limited space. For instance, even storing an 18-liter grease barrel is challenging. Furthermore, the actual toolbox must be placed inside the cabin, making it inconvenient to access, and it often causes damage to the seats and interior.
  4. Swing Bearing Prone to Cracks
    After 3000 hours, the swing bearing developed a long crack that had to be welded. The primary reason for this damage is the high swing speed of the Liugong excavator, coupled with the inexperienced operation at the beginning. The machine is often used for clearing tasks in rough terrain, where the swing hits tree stumps and other obstacles. This combined with frequent work on steep slopes puts substantial strain on the swing bearing.
  5. Frequent Fuse Blowouts
    The excavator has experienced frequent fuse blowouts, requiring regular replacements. This issue stems from the operators' failure to adhere to proper fuse specifications. Replacing the fuse without addressing the underlying cause has led to recurring damage to the equipment.
  6. Cramped Cabin Space, Poor Comfort
    The cabin of the Liugong 220L is quite cramped, especially when accommodating additional personnel. Long working hours lead to discomfort and fatigue. Additionally, the side windows, mimicking Japanese brands, have added steel pipes that obstruct the operator's view, which could pose safety risks during operation.
  7. Poor Cabin Sealing and Faulty Radio
    After 4000 operational hours, the cabin's poor sealing allowed dust to enter easily, creating an unpleasant environment for the operator. Moreover, the radio provided with the excavator was non-functional upon delivery and has remained useless ever since.
  8. Basic Operator Interface
    The control panel lacks critical features, including alarm sound indicators, and provides very limited information. It only has basic red light indicators, which makes it easy to overlook important operational feedback.
  9. Minor Design Flaws
    Several small issues include the air conditioning controls and wiper control buttons, which have quality problems. The buttons are prone to cracking after only a few uses, causing the wiper to stop working. To remedy this, the operator has had to use metal wire to secure certain control panels.
Conclusion
Overall, the Liugong 220L excavator was a competitive option in the Chinese domestic market when it was first introduced. The excavator offers good performance in terms of power, hydraulics, and digging efficiency, making it comparable to international brands. However, it still has gaps in design, production quality, and attention to detail, which result in certain performance issues. While the machine is durable and efficient for many tasks, Liugong needs to improve in areas such as cab design, sealing, and component durability to be more competitive in the global market.
It is hoped that domestic brands like Liugong will continue to improve their products, address these gaps, and eventually offer machines that can compete directly with established international brands.

Print this item

  The Development of China's Construction Machinery Industry
Posted by: MikePhua - 06-25-2025, 05:26 PM - Forum: Operator Talking - No Replies

China’s construction machinery industry has grown significantly over the past few decades, and its rapid development has played a crucial role in the country’s urbanization and infrastructure construction. However, the industry faces both challenges and opportunities as it enters a new phase of development. Understanding the key trends and future outlook can help industry players better prepare for what lies ahead.
Key Trends in the Construction Machinery Industry

  1. Shift Toward High-End Equipment
    The demand for more advanced, high-performance construction machinery is on the rise. As China’s construction industry matures, the focus is shifting from traditional, basic machines to more specialized, technologically advanced equipment. This includes machinery with higher fuel efficiency, reduced emissions, and better operational precision. The emphasis is on equipment that can deliver better productivity, reduce downtime, and lower operating costs.
  2. Technological Innovation and Smart Equipment
    Technological innovation is one of the most important drivers of change in the construction machinery industry. Companies are increasingly investing in smart machinery and automation technologies. Features such as GPS tracking, telematics, and remote monitoring are becoming standard in new machinery, providing better control, safety, and performance. This trend towards smarter equipment is not only improving operational efficiency but also ensuring more sustainable and eco-friendly solutions.
  3. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance
    As environmental concerns grow, stricter regulations regarding emissions and fuel consumption are being implemented by the government. The push for green technologies has led to the development of equipment that meets international environmental standards. Construction machinery manufacturers are focusing on producing more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly machines to comply with these regulations and reduce the environmental impact of construction operations.
  4. Consolidation of the Industry
    With the increasing competition in the market, consolidation is becoming a significant trend in China’s construction machinery industry. Smaller and less competitive companies are either being acquired by larger companies or forced to exit the market. This consolidation is leading to the creation of a more concentrated and efficient market, with fewer but stronger players who can invest more in research and development, technology, and after-sales services.
Opportunities for the Industry
  1. International Expansion
    As the domestic market becomes more saturated, Chinese construction machinery manufacturers are turning their attention to international markets. The "Belt and Road Initiative" has opened up new avenues for Chinese companies to expand their presence in countries along the initiative’s route. This presents a significant growth opportunity, as infrastructure development in these countries requires modern and reliable construction machinery.
  2. Aftermarket Services and Spare Parts
    The aftermarket sector is an increasingly important revenue stream for construction machinery companies. As the number of machines in operation grows, so does the demand for maintenance, repairs, and spare parts. Providing high-quality aftermarket services can create long-term customer loyalty and generate consistent revenue for companies, especially as more machines require servicing over time.
  3. Rural and Infrastructure Projects
    With continued government investment in rural infrastructure and large-scale projects such as high-speed rail and urban transportation, the demand for construction machinery will remain strong. New opportunities are emerging in both urban and rural areas, as the government continues to focus on infrastructure improvements across the country.
Challenges Facing the Industry
  1. Overcapacity
    The construction machinery industry in China has been grappling with overcapacity, especially as demand begins to stabilize. Many manufacturers have expanded production capacity to meet the rising demand of the past few years, but as growth slows, some of this capacity is now underutilized. This has led to fierce competition and price wars, which can hurt profit margins.
  2. Quality and Safety Concerns
    Despite significant advancements in technology, the quality and safety of some construction machinery remain a concern. Poor-quality machinery can lead to accidents on job sites, and safety issues can harm the reputation of manufacturers. Ensuring that products meet high safety standards is crucial for maintaining customer trust and regulatory compliance.
  3. Rising Costs
    The rising cost of raw materials, labor, and energy is another challenge facing the industry. These increases can affect the overall production costs of construction machinery, which in turn impacts pricing and profit margins. Manufacturers need to find ways to control costs while maintaining the quality of their products.
Conclusion
The construction machinery industry in China is poised for significant change. As the market continues to mature, the focus is shifting toward high-end equipment, technological innovation, and environmental sustainability. There are significant opportunities for growth, particularly in international markets, aftermarket services, and government infrastructure projects. However, challenges such as overcapacity, quality control, and rising costs must be addressed in order to sustain long-term growth. By embracing innovation and focusing on efficiency and sustainability, the industry can navigate these challenges and seize the opportunities that lie ahead.

Print this item

  Challenges and Opportunities in China's Construction Machinery Industry
Posted by: MikePhua - 06-25-2025, 05:26 PM - Forum: Operator Talking - No Replies

China's construction machinery industry has experienced rapid development over the past few decades, becoming one of the most important markets for construction machinery in the world. However, as the industry matures and the market continues to evolve, the construction machinery sector faces a series of new challenges and opportunities.
Industry Challenges

  1. Overcapacity and Increased Competition
    In recent years, China’s construction machinery industry has been under pressure from overcapacity. Many companies quickly expanded their production capacity in the short term, leading to an oversupply in the market and heightened competition. In this environment, companies must compete not only on price but also on technological innovation, service quality, and differentiation to stand out.
  2. Environmental Pressures and Regulatory Requirements
    As environmental regulations become increasingly stringent, the construction machinery industry faces significant pressure to meet new standards. Government policies are pushing for reductions in emissions and improved energy efficiency, gradually phasing out high-energy consumption and high-pollution equipment. This has created challenges in updating old equipment and developing eco-friendly technologies.
  3. Lack of Technological Innovation
    Although China's construction machinery industry holds a significant share in the global market, domestic manufacturers still lag behind international leaders in terms of technological innovation. The industry is plagued by imitation and low-level repetitive production, with a lack of core technologies, which weakens its competitiveness in the high-end market.
Industry Opportunities
  1. Demand for Infrastructure Construction
    With China’s urbanization process accelerating and continued government investment in infrastructure, the construction machinery industry still faces strong market demand. In particular, large-scale infrastructure projects such as railways, highways, bridges, and ports continue to drive the demand for construction machinery.
  2. International Expansion
    As the domestic market becomes saturated, expanding into international markets has become a key strategy for Chinese construction machinery companies. With the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative, domestic companies have more opportunities to capture a larger share of overseas markets.
  3. Intelligent and Green Development
    Intelligent and green development is becoming an essential trend in the next round of industrial upgrades. The widespread use of intelligent equipment and automated construction technologies will improve efficiency and reduce costs. Additionally, the development of eco-friendly machinery will allow companies to meet regulatory requirements while enhancing their market competitiveness.
  4. Aftermarket Services
    As the construction machinery equipment market gradually matures, aftermarket services have become a new growth area for companies. Providing maintenance, repair, and spare parts services allows construction machinery companies to enhance customer loyalty and generate continuous revenue streams.
Conclusion
China’s construction machinery industry is at a critical stage of transformation. While facing challenges such as overcapacity, environmental pressures, and a lack of technological innovation, the sector also has immense opportunities driven by strong infrastructure demand, international expansion, and the potential for intelligent and green development. In the future, companies in the industry must focus on improving technological innovation, strengthening service systems, and undergoing transformation and upgrades to seize opportunities and address challenges.

Print this item

  Insights on Old Kubota KH Excavators: Are They Still Worth It?
Posted by: MikePhua - 06-25-2025, 05:24 PM - Forum: Operator Talking - No Replies

Kubota is well-known for producing reliable and durable machinery, including its line of mini excavators. The Kubota KH series, which was popular several years ago, still has a strong following among those who value its compact size, efficiency, and durability. However, as with any older machinery, there are a few considerations to keep in mind when thinking about purchasing or continuing to use these models.
Strengths of the Kubota KH Excavators

  1. Durability and Build Quality: One of the standout features of the Kubota KH excavators is their robust construction. Despite their age, many operators find that these machines still run reliably with proper maintenance. The frames are built to withstand tough conditions, making them suitable for a variety of tasks, from landscaping to light construction work.
  2. Compact Size: The KH series excavators are particularly well-suited for work in confined spaces. Their small footprint allows for easy maneuverability in tight urban environments, small construction sites, and landscaping projects where larger machines may struggle.
  3. Simple and Easy to Operate: These machines are known for their user-friendly design. The controls are intuitive, making them easy to operate for both beginners and experienced users. Their simplicity also means fewer complex systems that could require costly repairs.
  4. Affordability: When compared to newer models, the older Kubota KH excavators are generally more affordable, making them a good choice for those on a budget or those looking for a second-hand machine. Their resale value tends to hold up reasonably well if they’ve been well-maintained.
Potential Drawbacks of the Kubota KH Excavators
  1. Aging Components: As with any older machinery, parts on the Kubota KH series can become worn or outdated. Hydraulic systems, engines, and electrical components may need more frequent maintenance or replacement over time. For instance, seals and hoses can wear out, and certain models may struggle with newer attachments or advanced functionality found in more modern excavators.
  2. Limited Features and Technology: While the KH series was state-of-the-art at the time, modern excavators now feature advanced technology, such as more efficient hydraulic systems, improved fuel economy, and better operator comfort. The Kubota KH series lacks some of the cutting-edge features that newer models offer, such as GPS tracking, advanced fuel management, or improved cab ergonomics.
  3. Availability of Parts: Depending on the model and the region, finding replacement parts for older Kubota KH excavators may become more challenging. While Kubota generally has a good reputation for providing parts support, some of the older models might require more effort to source specific components, especially as the model ages.
  4. Fuel Efficiency: Older excavators like the KH series may not be as fuel-efficient as newer models. This could result in higher operational costs, especially if the machine is being used frequently. However, this can be mitigated with proper maintenance and by using the machine within its designed capacity.
Is It Still Worth Purchasing an Old Kubota KH Excavator?
For those in need of a reliable, compact excavator at a lower cost, an old Kubota KH series machine can still be a solid choice. However, it’s essential to keep in mind that these machines may require more maintenance and attention than their modern counterparts. If you are buying second-hand, ensure that the machine has been well-maintained and check for common issues like worn-out hydraulics, engine problems, or electrical faults.
For users who only need a machine for light to moderate tasks in tight spaces, the Kubota KH excavators can still provide excellent service. On the other hand, if your work requires high productivity, advanced features, or the latest technology, you may want to consider investing in a newer model.
Conclusion
The Kubota KH excavators, while no longer cutting-edge, remain a viable option for those looking for a compact and reliable machine. They are durable, affordable, and perfect for confined space work, but they may require more maintenance and lack the modern features found in newer models. If you’re considering purchasing one, carefully evaluate the condition of the machine and weigh the potential costs of repairs against the cost savings compared to buying a new model.

Print this item