Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Volvo EC210B Prime vs. Hitachi EX200-2: Diesel Excavator Comparison
#1
When selecting an excavator, especially for construction companies or equipment rental businesses, it’s crucial to understand the performance differences between different models. The Volvo EC210B Prime and Hitachi EX200-2 are two commonly used crawler excavators, representing modern and older technology levels, respectively. This article will compare the two excavators, highlighting their advantages, disadvantages, and suitable applications.
Engine Performance Comparison
  1. Volvo EC210B Prime
    The Volvo EC210B Prime is equipped with a powerful diesel engine that provides efficient and stable power output. This engine meets the latest environmental standards, offering lower emissions and better fuel efficiency. The EC210B Prime excels in heavy-duty operations, effectively reducing fuel consumption while maintaining high operational efficiency.
  2. Hitachi EX200-2
    In contrast, the Hitachi EX200-2 is an older model, and while its diesel engine performed well in earlier applications, it lags behind in terms of fuel efficiency and emission standards. Although its power output remains stable, its fuel consumption is higher, and it doesn't meet the newer emission levels seen in modern machines.
Operational Performance Comparison
  1. Volvo EC210B Prime
    The Volvo EC210B Prime features an advanced operating system, equipped with more precise hydraulic controls and an intelligent interface that makes it easier for operators to achieve precise movements. Additionally, the EC210B Prime offers better stability and comfort during operations, making it suitable for extended working hours.
  2. Hitachi EX200-2
    The Hitachi EX200-2 also has a stable hydraulic system but its operation interface and response speed are somewhat outdated compared to modern machines. While the EX200-2 can still handle everyday earthmoving tasks effectively, operators may experience fatigue during long hours of precision work or high-intensity operations due to its less advanced system.
Maintenance and Reliability Comparison
  1. Volvo EC210B Prime
    As a modern machine, the Volvo EC210B Prime is highly reliable with a lower failure rate. Volvo offers comprehensive after-sales service and repair support, ensuring easy access to parts and technical assistance. Moreover, the EC210B Prime has longer maintenance intervals, which helps reduce long-term maintenance costs.
  2. Hitachi EX200-2
    Due to its older technology, the Hitachi EX200-2 typically incurs higher maintenance costs, especially as parts wear down over time. While it remains durable and robust, older components, particularly in the hydraulic system or engine, may require more frequent repairs and part replacements.
Fuel Efficiency and Operating Costs Comparison
  1. Volvo EC210B Prime
    The Volvo EC210B Prime offers excellent fuel efficiency, particularly during prolonged or heavy load operations. It effectively reduces fuel consumption, lowering operating costs. With its low emissions, the EC210B Prime is both an environmentally friendly and cost-effective choice for operators.
  2. Hitachi EX200-2
    In contrast, the Hitachi EX200-2 has relatively poor fuel efficiency, especially during high-load operations, where fuel consumption increases significantly, raising operating costs. While it can still handle most tasks, its long-term operational costs are higher compared to the more efficient Volvo EC210B Prime.
Conclusion
In summary, the Volvo EC210B Prime outperforms the Hitachi EX200-2 in several key areas, including fuel efficiency, emission standards, operational performance, and maintenance costs. Its modern design and superior work efficiency make it a preferred choice for many construction projects. On the other hand, the Hitachi EX200-2, though still capable of performing tasks, feels outdated when compared to modern excavators. For businesses with the budget to invest in new equipment, the Volvo EC210B Prime offers better value in terms of performance, fuel savings, and long-term reliability.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Hydraulic Flow and Pressure Data for Excavator Pumps and Motors MikePhua 0 1 5 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Moving an Excavator: Best Practices and Considerations MikePhua 0 1 5 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Fiat 14C: A Look at the History and Capabilities of a Classic Excavator MikePhua 0 1 5 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Volvo FC24210C Hybrid Excavator and the Rise of Low-Radius Forestry Machines MikePhua 0 1 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 345 Excavator and the Bridge to Nowhere MikePhua 0 1 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Improving Boom Cylinder Performance on Hitachi ZX350-3 Excavators MikePhua 0 1 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Excavator Tree Felling Accidents and Operator Safety Lessons MikePhua 0 1 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu PC750-6 Excavator Performance and Practical Insights MikePhua 0 1 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu PC75UU-2 Excavator: A Detailed Project Overview and Restoration Guide MikePhua 0 1 7 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Bobcat E85 Excavator Compared to Kubota KX080 in Real-World Utility Work MikePhua 0 1 7 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  JCB JS330 Excavator MikePhua 0 1 7 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu PC75 Excavator: Diagnosing and Fixing a Leak Under the House MikePhua 0 1 8 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hitachi's Equivalent to the CAT 365B Excavator MikePhua 0 1 8 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hitachi EX200-2 Excavator MikePhua 0 3 08-29-2025, 10:36 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Volvo G970 Motor Grader in Action and Design MikePhua 0 1 08-29-2025, 10:34 PM
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: