Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Caterpillar 320D GC Excavator Review: Built for Earthworks
#1
In 2010, Caterpillar launched the 320D GC excavator, specially designed for earthworks and tailored to the needs of Chinese users. Known as the "Earthworks King," this model offers a balanced mix of performance and fuel efficiency, making it an excellent choice for operators focused on large-scale excavation projects. Compared to the standard 320D, the 320D GC is lighter, more fuel-efficient, and cost-effective, specifically designed to serve users working in earthmoving and moderate-duty construction projects.
Key Features of the Caterpillar 320D GC:
  • Engine: Equipped with the Caterpillar C6.4 engine, delivering 92.3 kW of power, which is 10 kW less than the 320D. Despite the lower power rating, the engine remains highly reliable, with the same internal structure as the 320D, ensuring smooth performance and fuel efficiency.
  • Design: The 320D GC is 400 kg lighter than the 320D. The chassis and boom use slightly thinner steel, but it's still robust enough to handle most earthmoving tasks, including non-rock operations.
  • Fuel Efficiency: The 320D GC offers improved fuel efficiency over the 320D, with fuel consumption around 16-17 liters per hour when operating at 8-speed throttle, making it suitable for extended use on job sites.
User Experience:
According to SK6, a veteran operator and 320D GC user, the excavator's performance has been impressive, with over 250 hours of use. Below are the key insights from his experience:
  • Power & Fuel Efficiency: The 320D GC's performance is highly adequate for earthworks, providing sufficient power for digging and lifting. Despite the 10 kW power reduction, the hydraulic system pressure remains unchanged, offering consistent and reliable performance.
  • Cold Start: When cold-starting the machine, minor black smoke is produced. However, this quickly clears up after 2-3 minutes of operation, indicating the engine is operating normally.
  • Smooth Operation: The rotation and other key parts of the machine operate smoothly, and the cabin's tight seal ensures better air pressure inside, contributing to a quieter and more comfortable working environment.
Pros and Cons of the Caterpillar 320D GC:
Pros:
  • Fuel Efficiency: Compared to the 320D, the 320D GC is more fuel-efficient, consuming 16-17 liters of fuel per hour, which is ideal for prolonged earthworks projects.
  • Adequate Power: Despite being designed for earthworks, the machine delivers ample power to handle typical tasks effectively.
  • Moderate Speed: The machine operates at an optimal speed for most day-to-day tasks, offering a balance between power and performance.
Cons:
  • Thin Bucket: The standard bucket is relatively thin and may require reinforcement for tougher conditions, especially when dealing with denser materials.
  • Seat Comfort: The seat isn't a suspension type, which may affect comfort during long hours of operation.
  • Throttle Control: When operating at low speeds (7-speed throttle or less), the machine may struggle with tougher earth. The throttle response is significant—at 8-speed, the machine feels noticeably more powerful.
Final Thoughts
From SK6's review, it’s clear that the 320D GC is an excellent machine for earthworks with its fuel efficiency, solid power, and reliable performance. While it has a few minor shortcomings, such as the thin bucket and seat comfort, these can be addressed with minor adjustments. Overall, the 320D GC proves to be a great choice for operators focused on earthmoving tasks. If you have further insights or experiences with this model, feel free to share, as it can help others in the construction industry make informed decisions.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  CAT 304 ECR: A Compact Excavator with Big Capabilities MikePhua 0 8 5 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hitachi EX75UR: A Comprehensive Guide to the Mini Excavator MikePhua 0 7 5 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Excavator Size for Your Project MikePhua 0 13 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Should You Replace a Clutch Fan with Direct Drive on Your Excavator MikePhua 0 11 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu PC75UU-2 Excavator: Insights and Key Considerations MikePhua 0 10 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Should You Buy an Excavator That Has Been Submerged MikePhua 0 9 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 902 Compact Wheel Loader Overview MikePhua 0 4 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Buying Your First Excavator: The Volvo EC160CL MikePhua 0 7 Yesterday, 04:57 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Will Caterpillar Ever Build a D12 Dozer MikePhua 0 6 Yesterday, 04:35 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Fuel Priming Procedure for the CAT 320CL Excavator MikePhua 0 9 Yesterday, 04:22 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Electrical System Overview for the Doosan DX140W Wheeled Excavator MikePhua 0 8 Yesterday, 04:19 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 416C: An In-Depth Overview of a Versatile Backhoe Loader MikePhua 0 6 Yesterday, 04:16 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Case CX28 Excavator: A Comprehensive Overview MikePhua 0 10 Yesterday, 04:15 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Glow Plug Control Issues on the CAT 301.7D CR Excavator MikePhua 0 11 Yesterday, 03:51 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Why Is There No Heat in a 2013 John Deere 135D Excavator MikePhua 0 11 Yesterday, 03:45 PM
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)