10 hours ago
Submersion Risks in Hydraulic Excavators
Excavators are engineered for rugged environments, but water immersion—especially full submersion—poses serious risks. When a machine like a Doosan 140 slides into a pond and remains underwater for a day, the damage can extend far beyond surface corrosion. Electrical systems, hydraulic circuits, and engine internals are all vulnerable. Even if the machine is recovered and serviced, the long-term reliability depends on the thoroughness of the rehabilitation and the quality of the components replaced.
Terminology Note
In one case, a 2006 Doosan 140 with 3600 hours was submerged and later repaired by a dealer. The seller provided receipts showing $7,000 in repairs, including fluid replacement, a new ECM, and wiring restoration. The machine had been in regular use for several years with no reported issues. While this history is encouraging, buyers must weigh several factors:
In Missouri, a contractor reported chasing electrical faults for three years after restoring a CAT 321 that had sunk. Terminals corroded slowly, causing intermittent failures. In contrast, a Deere 50D submerged in wastewater was fully restored with a new harness and monitor, and ran flawlessly for a decade. The difference? The electrical system was replaced entirely, not patched.
In Texas, a buyer acquired a submerged Doosan 140 with a hydraulic compactor for $30,000. Despite initial skepticism, the machine performed well, and the price was competitive given the regional market. However, resale prospects remain limited, and the buyer must extract full value through operation, not trade-in.
When Is It Worth the Risk
Buying a submerged excavator is a calculated risk. With proper documentation, thorough inspection, and realistic expectations, it can be a cost-effective solution—especially in high-demand markets. However, buyers must be prepared for potential electrical issues and limited resale value. The key is not whether the machine was underwater, but how well it was brought back to life.
Excavators are engineered for rugged environments, but water immersion—especially full submersion—poses serious risks. When a machine like a Doosan 140 slides into a pond and remains underwater for a day, the damage can extend far beyond surface corrosion. Electrical systems, hydraulic circuits, and engine internals are all vulnerable. Even if the machine is recovered and serviced, the long-term reliability depends on the thoroughness of the rehabilitation and the quality of the components replaced.
Terminology Note
- ECM (Electronic Control Module): The brain of the excavator’s engine and hydraulic systems, responsible for interpreting sensor data and managing performance.
- Harness Corrosion: Oxidation of copper wires and terminals, often invisible until failure.
- Hydraulic Plate Compactor: An attachment used for soil compaction, often included in resale deals.
- Loss/Damage Waiver: A rental contract clause that covers accidental damage; absence of this clause can leave renters liable for full repair costs.
In one case, a 2006 Doosan 140 with 3600 hours was submerged and later repaired by a dealer. The seller provided receipts showing $7,000 in repairs, including fluid replacement, a new ECM, and wiring restoration. The machine had been in regular use for several years with no reported issues. While this history is encouraging, buyers must weigh several factors:
- Electrical longevity: Even after repairs, submerged wiring may degrade over time.
- Resale value: Machines with a submersion history often fetch lower prices, regardless of performance.
- Component fatigue: Water intrusion can accelerate wear in bearings, seals, and connectors.
- Market conditions: In high-demand regions, such as Dallas during a construction boom, prices may justify the risk.
- Request full service documentation, including parts replaced and technician notes.
- Inspect all electrical connectors for signs of corrosion or aftermarket splicing.
- Test hydraulic functions under load to detect latent valve or pump issues.
- Use a diagnostic tool to scan for hidden fault codes in the ECM.
- Negotiate price based on hours, brand reputation, and submersion history.
In Missouri, a contractor reported chasing electrical faults for three years after restoring a CAT 321 that had sunk. Terminals corroded slowly, causing intermittent failures. In contrast, a Deere 50D submerged in wastewater was fully restored with a new harness and monitor, and ran flawlessly for a decade. The difference? The electrical system was replaced entirely, not patched.
In Texas, a buyer acquired a submerged Doosan 140 with a hydraulic compactor for $30,000. Despite initial skepticism, the machine performed well, and the price was competitive given the regional market. However, resale prospects remain limited, and the buyer must extract full value through operation, not trade-in.
When Is It Worth the Risk
- If the machine has low hours, complete repair records, and has been operated consistently since the incident, it may be a viable purchase.
- If the price is significantly below market, and the buyer has mechanical expertise, the risk can be mitigated.
- If the machine is from a less sought-after brand, like Doosan, resale value may already be low, making operational use the primary goal.
Buying a submerged excavator is a calculated risk. With proper documentation, thorough inspection, and realistic expectations, it can be a cost-effective solution—especially in high-demand markets. However, buyers must be prepared for potential electrical issues and limited resale value. The key is not whether the machine was underwater, but how well it was brought back to life.
