Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Choosing High or Low Speed When Operating a Track Loader
#1
Speed Selection Depends on Task and Terrain
Operators of track loaders often face the decision of whether to use high or low speed during loading operations. This choice is not merely about preference—it directly affects traction, fuel efficiency, hydraulic response, and drivetrain longevity. For machines like the Case C939, which features a hydrostatic transmission, the decision becomes even more nuanced. Hydrostatic systems allow for variable speed control without gear shifting, but they also introduce thermal considerations when torque demand increases.
High Speed for Light Work and Maneuvering
High speed is generally preferred when:
  • Moving across open ground
  • Transporting material between piles
  • Performing light grading or cleanup
In these scenarios, the loader benefits from faster travel and reduced cycle times. However, high speed can lead to track slippage when pushing into dense material, especially if the surface is loose or uneven. Operators have noted that high speed sometimes helps reduce spinning when approaching a pile, as momentum aids penetration—but this must be balanced against converter heat buildup.
Low Speed for Heavy Pushing and Digging
Low speed is ideal when:
  • Engaging in hard pushes
  • Loading dense or compacted material
  • Operating on inclines or soft ground
In low speed, the machine delivers greater torque and maintains better traction. This reduces stress on the undercarriage and minimizes wear on the drive sprockets and track pads. For hydrostatic machines, low speed also helps manage hydraulic fluid temperature, as excessive converter slip in high speed can generate heat and degrade performance.
Torque Converter vs Hydrostatic Drive
Track loaders may use either a torque converter or a hydrostatic transmission. A torque converter multiplies engine torque and allows for smooth gear transitions, but it can slip under load, generating heat. Hydrostatic drives use hydraulic pumps and motors to deliver power directly to the tracks, offering precise control but requiring careful thermal management.
In both systems, the principle remains: use low speed for high torque tasks, and high speed for mobility and light work.
Operator Tips and Field Experience
  • Monitor converter temperature gauges if available. Excessive heat can signal overuse of high speed under load.
  • Use momentum strategically when approaching piles, but avoid spinning tracks.
  • On hydrostatic models, modulate the joystick to balance speed and torque rather than relying solely on range selection.
  • In muddy or frozen conditions, low speed reduces slippage and improves control.
One veteran operator in Tennessee recalled using high speed to approach a gravel pile, only to find the tracks spinning and the machine losing forward motion. Switching to low speed allowed the loader to bite into the pile and complete the load without strain.
Manufacturer Guidance and Design Evolution
Manufacturers like Case, Caterpillar, and John Deere have refined their transmission systems over decades. The Case C939, for example, was part of a lineage of hydrostatic loaders designed for urban and utility work. These machines emphasized operator control and fuel efficiency, with sales peaking in the late 1990s. While newer models now feature electronic speed modulation and load-sensing hydraulics, the core principles of speed selection remain unchanged.
Recommendations for Optimal Operation
  • Use low speed for digging, pushing, and climbing
  • Use high speed for travel, cleanup, and light grading
  • Avoid sudden transitions between speed ranges under load
  • Regularly inspect track tension and undercarriage wear
  • Train operators to recognize thermal limits and traction cues
Conclusion
Selecting high or low speed on a track loader is a tactical decision rooted in physics, machine design, and operator experience. By understanding the demands of each task and the capabilities of the transmission system, operators can maximize efficiency, reduce wear, and ensure safe, productive operation. Whether using a torque converter or hydrostatic drive, the key is to match speed to the job—not just the terrain.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Choosing the Right Excavator Size for Your Project MikePhua 0 13 8 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Building Fire Breaks with Compact Track Loaders (CTL) MikePhua 0 11 8 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Replacement for Volvo A40F Haul Trucks MikePhua 0 12 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Buying a 100-Ton C-Frame Track Press for Undercarriage Work MikePhua 0 6 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Can the Allison TT2420-1 Transmission Replace the TT2221-1 in a Case W20B Loader MikePhua 0 5 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hough International H-70 Loader Overview MikePhua 0 6 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 902 Compact Wheel Loader Overview MikePhua 0 4 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing a 120-Tonne All Terrain Crane for Modular Home Lifting MikePhua 0 7 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Understanding the 1999 JCB 185 Skid Steer Loader MikePhua 0 6 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Track or Wheel Loader for Farm Use MikePhua 0 10 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Comparing CAT 928HZ and Hyundai 757-9: Which Loader is the Better Option? MikePhua 0 4 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Michigan L190 Loader Overview and Insights MikePhua 0 6 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Evaluating the 2008 Case 445CT Compact Track Loader MikePhua 0 6 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 416C: An In-Depth Overview of a Versatile Backhoe Loader MikePhua 0 6 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Can You Change the Working Hours on a CAT 962G Loader After Installing a New ECM MikePhua 0 5 Yesterday, 03:34 PM
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)