Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Caterpillar 245 Excavator Weight Without Counterweight and Stick Reflects Its Core Frame Mass
#1
The Legacy of the Caterpillar 245 in Mass Excavation
Introduced in the late 1970s, the Caterpillar 245 was one of the largest hydraulic excavators in Caterpillar’s lineup at the time. Designed for mining, quarrying, and large-scale earthmoving, the 245 was built to deliver brute force with hydraulic precision. Its robust undercarriage, high-flow hydraulic system, and modular boom-stick configurations made it a favorite among contractors handling deep trenching, mass excavation, and demolition.
At full configuration, the Caterpillar 245 weighed approximately 150,000 lbs (68,000 kg), depending on the boom type, stick length, bucket size, and counterweight installed. However, when stripped down for transport or rebuild—without the counterweight and stick—the machine’s core weight drops significantly.
Terminology Notes
  • Counterweight: A removable mass mounted at the rear of the excavator to balance the forward load during digging.
  • Stick: The arm section between the boom and bucket, responsible for reach and digging depth.
  • Base frame: The central structure including the undercarriage, cab, engine, and hydraulic system.
  • Transport weight: The reduced weight of a machine prepared for shipping, often with attachments removed.
Estimated Weight Without Counterweight and Stick
When the counterweight and stick are removed, the Caterpillar 245’s weight typically falls between 105,000 and 115,000 lbs (47,600–52,200 kg). This includes:
  • Main frame and undercarriage
  • Cab and operator station
  • Hydraulic pumps and lines
  • Engine and cooling system
  • Boom (if still attached)
  • Track assemblies
The counterweight alone can weigh over 20,000 lbs, and the stick with bucket adds another 10,000–15,000 lbs depending on configuration. Removing these components is standard practice for long-distance transport or major overhaul.
A Story from the Iron Range
In 2010, a mining contractor in Minnesota needed to move a Caterpillar 245 across state lines for a rebuild. The machine was disassembled on-site, with the counterweight lifted using a 100-ton crane and the stick removed via boom cradle. The stripped-down unit was loaded onto a multi-axle lowboy trailer, weighing just under 110,000 lbs. The transport permit required axle spacing and route planning due to bridge weight limits. The mechanic said, “It looked bare—but still felt like a beast.”
Transport and Reassembly Considerations
When preparing a 245 for transport:
  • Remove counterweight using certified lifting eyes and rigging
  • Detach stick and bucket, securing hydraulic lines with caps
  • Inspect boom pins and bushings for wear before reassembly
  • Drain hydraulic fluid to reduce weight and prevent leaks
  • Use cribbing and jack stands to stabilize the frame during disassembly
  • Document all removed components for inventory and torque specs
During reassembly, ensure proper alignment of the stick cylinder and verify counterweight bolts are torqued to factory specifications. Always bleed the hydraulic system before startup.
Maintenance and Structural Integrity
Even without attachments, the base frame of the 245 must be inspected for:
  • Weld fatigue near boom mounts
  • Track tension and roller wear
  • Hydraulic pump seals and shaft alignment
  • Engine mounts and vibration isolators
  • Cab structure and operator controls
Some rebuilds include frame reinforcement or retrofitting with upgraded hydraulic lines and electronic monitoring systems.
Final Thoughts
The Caterpillar 245 excavator, even without its counterweight and stick, remains a formidable structure of steel and hydraulics. Its stripped-down weight reflects the core engineering that made it a workhorse in the excavation world. Whether being shipped for overhaul or staged for assembly, understanding its partial weight is essential for logistics, safety, and planning. In heavy equipment, the mass tells the story—and even without its arms, the 245 still commands respect.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Maintaining the Final Drive System in Caterpillar D4G Dozers MikePhua 0 1 1 minute ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  JCB 65R-1 Mini Excavator Performance Design and Field Adaptability MikePhua 0 3 25 minutes ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 988K Wheel Loader Power Durability and Mining-Grade Performance MikePhua 0 4 33 minutes ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Buying a Used 3-Ton Excavator Smart Inspection and Ownership Strategy MikePhua 0 4 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  How Much Weight Can You Safely Attach to a Dozer? MikePhua 0 4 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar D7T Engine Details and Carbody Lighting System MikePhua 0 4 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  John Deere 330 LC: A Powerful and Versatile Excavator MikePhua 0 3 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Buying a Used Caterpillar 120 Motor Grader with Confidence MikePhua 0 4 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Volvo EC290C NL Excavator: Key Features and Insights MikePhua 0 4 3 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hyundai 160LC-7 Excavator Reliability and System Optimization MikePhua 0 4 3 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Custom Forestry Excavator Builds for Rugged Terrain MikePhua 0 4 3 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Kobelco SK120 Excavator Performance History and Practical Insights MikePhua 0 4 3 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Mini Excavator: Key Considerations MikePhua 0 4 3 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  CAT 235 Excavator A Legacy of Power and Precision MikePhua 0 4 3 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hitachi ZX LC-N: A Detailed Overview of the Excavator Series MikePhua 0 4 3 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)