4 hours ago
Introduction
When evaluating compact track loaders, the Case TR270 and Caterpillar 259D stand out as prominent choices in the industry. Both machines offer robust performance, but understanding their differences is crucial for selecting the right equipment for specific tasks.
Engine and Power
Both the Case TR270 and Caterpillar 259D are formidable compact track loaders, each with its strengths. The TR270 offers slightly better maneuverability and a higher lift capacity, while the 259D provides a higher operating weight and ground clearance. Your choice should depend on specific job requirements, terrain conditions, and personal preference for machine handling and comfort.
When evaluating compact track loaders, the Case TR270 and Caterpillar 259D stand out as prominent choices in the industry. Both machines offer robust performance, but understanding their differences is crucial for selecting the right equipment for specific tasks.
Engine and Power
- Case TR270: Equipped with a 74 horsepower (55 kW) FPT F5H FL463A Tier 4 Final diesel engine, the TR270 delivers reliable power for various applications.
- Caterpillar 259D: Powered by a 74.3 horsepower (55.4 kW) Cat C3.3B DIT turbocharged engine, the 259D offers comparable horsepower, ensuring efficient operation.
- Case TR270: With an operating weight of approximately 8,270 lbs (3,750 kg), the TR270 measures 10 ft 10 in (3.29 m) in length, 5 ft 6 in (1.68 m) in width, and 6 ft 7 in (1.998 m) in height.
- Caterpillar 259D: The 259D has a slightly higher operating weight of 8,846 lbs (4,076 kg) and dimensions of 11 ft 5 in (3.48 m) in length, 5 ft 6 in (1.68 m) in width, and 6 ft 11 in (2.11 m) in height.
- Case TR270: Offers a rated operating capacity of 2,700 lbs (1,225 kg) at 35% tipping load.
- Caterpillar 259D: Provides a rated operating capacity of 2,900 lbs (1,315 kg) at 50% tipping load.
- Case TR270: Features a ground pressure of 4.4 psi, making it suitable for sensitive terrains.
- Caterpillar 259D: Has a ground pressure of 4.8 psi, slightly higher but still effective for various ground conditions.
- Case TR270: Standard hydraulic flow is 80.3 L/min (21.2 GPM), with a high-flow option of 115.5 L/min (30.5 GPM).
- Caterpillar 259D: Standard hydraulic flow is 80.3 L/min (21.2 GPM), with a high-flow option of 115.5 L/min (30.5 GPM), matching the TR270's capabilities.
- Case TR270: Achieves a maximum travel speed of 8.1 mph (13 km/h), facilitating efficient movement across job sites.
- Caterpillar 259D: Reaches a maximum travel speed of 6.7 mph (10.8 km/h), slightly slower but still adequate for most tasks.
- Case TR270: Offers an ergonomic joystick control system, an 8-inch LCD display, and a spacious cabin for enhanced operator comfort.
- Caterpillar 259D: Features a comfortable operator station with intuitive controls and excellent visibility, ensuring a productive work environment.
Both the Case TR270 and Caterpillar 259D are formidable compact track loaders, each with its strengths. The TR270 offers slightly better maneuverability and a higher lift capacity, while the 259D provides a higher operating weight and ground clearance. Your choice should depend on specific job requirements, terrain conditions, and personal preference for machine handling and comfort.
