Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Comparison of John Deere 655, Dresta 175C, and Caterpillar 955L Track Loaders
#1
Overview of Machines
The John Deere 655, Dresta 175C, and Caterpillar 955L are all classic track loaders widely valued for their reliability and versatility in earthmoving and construction applications. While each offers similar core functionalities, differences in size, weight, power, and specific features influence operator preference and suitability for various jobs.
John Deere 655
  • Weight: Approximately 28,000 to 30,000 pounds.
  • Engine: Typically powered by a robust 6-cylinder diesel engine producing around 145-160 horsepower.
  • Features: Known for durable construction, straightforward mechanical systems making maintenance accessible.
  • Undercarriage: Equipped with wide tracks providing good flotation on soft or uneven terrain.
  • Application: Well suited for mid-size grading, material handling, and general construction tasks.
Dresta 175C
  • Weight: Approximately 30,000 pounds, comparable to the Deere 655.
  • Engine: Similar power range around 140-160 horsepower with a focus on torque.
  • Design: Often appreciated for its simpler design, robust parts availability, and affordability on the used equipment market.
  • Steering: Offers effective track articulation, smooth operation emphasized in operator feedback.
  • Application: Suitable for earthmoving, site prep, and smaller quarry or landscaping projects.
Caterpillar 955L
  • Weight: Heavier, approximately 32,000 to 34,000 pounds, providing strong ground engagement.
  • Engine: Powered by a high-torque diesel engine delivering approximately 160-170 horsepower.
  • Features: Often considered the 'Cadillac' of track loaders, known for superior build quality, advanced hydraulics, and high fuel efficiency.
  • Undercarriage: Renowned for durable track systems and longevity in tough conditions.
  • Application: Preferred for more demanding jobs requiring higher power and extended service intervals.
Key Comparison Points
  • Size and Weight: 955L is the largest and heaviest, providing more pushing power and stability. Deere 655 and Dresta 175C are similar in weight and dimensions, granting maneuverability advantages.
  • Power and Performance: All offer comparable horsepower ranges; however, Cat’s advanced hydraulic system yields more efficient work cycles and smoother controls.
  • Maintenance and Parts: Deere and Dresta machines are praised for simpler, easier-to-source parts, whereas Caterpillar’s parts may be costlier but benefit from extensive dealer support.
  • Operator Comfort: The 955L typically features a more ergonomic cab with better suspension and operator controls.
Terminology
  • Track Loader: Heavy equipment combining a tracked chassis with a front loading bucket, used for digging, grading, and materials transport.
  • Flotation: Track width and length contributing to machine’s ability to traverse soft ground without excessive sinking.
  • Hydraulics: The system using pressurized fluid to control machine functions such as bucket lift and track steering.
  • Torque: Rotational force produced by the engine, critical for earthmoving efficiency.
Industry Insight
Operators often select between these track loaders based on job size and terrain conditions. Smaller contractors or specialized landscaping firms might favor Deere or Dresta for their balance of power and accessibility. Larger contractors engaged in heavy construction might prefer Cat for its industry-leading durability and advanced features.
Summary
The John Deere 655, Dresta 175C, and Caterpillar 955L each offer reliable performance with subtle differences affecting suitability for specific tasks. Deere and Dresta balance maneuverability and cost-effectiveness, while Caterpillar stands out for ruggedness and operator comfort in heavier work. Understanding these distinctions allows informed decisions aligning machine capability with project requirements and budget constraints.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Caterpillar D5 Dozer: A Legacy of Power and Precision MikePhua 0 4 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar D6C 69J Series Mechanical Heritage and Field Performance MikePhua 0 5 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Identifying the Caterpillar D7 Dozer with Serial Number 3T13260 MikePhua 0 4 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  John Deere 510D Backhoe Loader Performance Reliability and Field Wisdom MikePhua 0 4 7 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Armored Caterpillar D7A Dozers in World War II Combat Engineering MikePhua 0 4 8 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar D9 for the Jobs Nobody Else Wants MikePhua 0 4 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 225 Excavator: A Milestone in Hydraulic Excavation MikePhua 0 4 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 225 Excavator: Sourcing Used Parts MikePhua 0 4 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 420D Engine 107-0014 Performance and Reliability MikePhua 0 4 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 420D Engine 107-0014 Performance and Reliability MikePhua 0 3 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 955K Crawler Loader Serial Number Identification MikePhua 0 4 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar PM-102 Cold Planer Performance and Field Experience MikePhua 0 4 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  John Deere 850-C: A Detailed Look at the Tractor's Production and Legacy MikePhua 0 7 10-04-2025, 03:11 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  John Deere 319D Is a Compact Track Loader That Balances Power and Precision MikePhua 0 5 10-04-2025, 03:10 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 315: A Reliable and Versatile Excavator MikePhua 0 4 10-04-2025, 03:08 PM
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)