Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Case Loader Showdown: 1987 Case 580K vs. 1992 580 Super K - A Detailed Comparison
#1
When shopping for used backhoe loaders, two models frequently dominate the conversation - the venerable 1987 Case 580K and its upgraded successor, the 1992 580 Super K. Both machines represent excellent values in today's used equipment market, but key differences in performance, maintenance needs, and operating costs make each better suited for specific applications.
Historical Context and Market Position
The late 1980s to early 1990s marked a transitional period for Case construction equipment:
  • The 580K (introduced 1986) refined the successful 580 series with improved hydraulics
  • The Super K (1990-1993) incorporated evolutionary improvements before the radical 580SK redesign
  • Over 12,000 units of each model were produced, ensuring good parts availability today
A 2021 auction analysis showed 580Ks averaging $14,500 vs. $18,200 for Super Ks - a 25% price difference reflecting their capability gap.
Mechanical Specifications Compared
Powertrain Differences
  • 580K:
    • 4-cylinder Case 4-390 diesel (85 HP)
    • 8x2 manual transmission
    • Mechanical fuel injection
  • Super K:
    • Upgraded 4-cylinder Case 4-402 diesel (92 HP)
    • Improved 8x2 synchromesh transmission
    • Advanced rotary fuel injection pump
Hydraulic Systems
  • 580K:
    • Open-center hydraulic system
    • 17 GPM pump flow
    • 2,900 psi relief pressure
  • Super K:
    • More efficient closed-center system
    • 19 GPM pump flow
    • 3,100 psi relief pressure
Performance in Real-World Applications
Digging and Loading Tests
Independent tests from 1993 showed:
  • Super K completed trenching work 12% faster
  • 580K used 8% less fuel per hour
  • Both machines achieved similar breakout forces (7,200-7,500 lbs)
Operator Comfort Features
The Super K added:
  • Improved cab suspension
  • Better instrument layout
  • Reduced vibration levels (15% lower at idle)
Common Maintenance Issues by Model
580K Typical Problems
  • Transmission synchronizer wear (3rd/4th gear)
  • Weak front axle pivot bushings
  • Steering cylinder leaks
  • Injection pump drive gear failures
Super K Common Faults
  • Rotary injection pump failures ($1,200 rebuild)
  • Hydraulic control valve sticking
  • Front axle support cracks
  • Electrical gremlins in later models
Cost of Ownership Analysis
5-Year Projection (1,200 hrs/year)
  • 580K:
    • Average repairs: $3,200/year
    • Fuel: $9,800/year
    • Resale value retention: 65%
  • Super K:
    • Average repairs: $2,600/year
    • Fuel: $10,500/year
    • Resale value retention: 72%
Which Model Makes More Sense Today?
Choose the 580K If:
  • Budget is primary concern
  • Mechanical simplicity preferred
  • Light to moderate usage anticipated
  • Operator familiarity with older controls
Opt for the Super K When:
  • Higher productivity needed
  • Reduced downtime is critical
  • Operating in cold climates (better cold starts)
  • Resale value matters
Success Story: Minnesota Excavating Company
A small contractor purchased both models in 2015:
  • The 580K served well for light duty work
  • The Super K handled demanding jobs
    After 7,000 hours each:
  • 580K required $18,000 in major repairs
  • Super K needed just $12,500
    "While the Super K cost more upfront, it paid for itself in reliability," reported the owner.
Modern Upgrade Options
Both models benefit from:
  • LED light conversions ($400 kit)
  • Aftermarket hydraulic quick couplers ($750)
  • Seat upgrades ($500-800)
  • Bolt-on ROPS for older units ($2,500)
Expert Recommendations
For buyers today:
  1. Prioritize unit condition over model year
  2. Verify transmission operation under load
  3. Check for axle support cracks (Super K)
  4. Test hydraulic functions cold
  5. Review maintenance records if available
The Verdict
While the 580K remains a solid value, the Super K's improvements in performance, reliability, and operator comfort typically justify its higher price - especially for professional use. As one equipment appraiser noted, "A well-maintained Super K often outworks newer machines twice its price, while the 580K is perfect for those who value simplicity over features."
Ultimately, both models represent the golden era of mechanical backhoes - built to last and easy to repair, qualities that become more valuable with each passing year in our disposable-equipment age.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Takeuchi TB290 vs. CAT 308-2CR: A Comparison of Two Leading Mini Excavators MikePhua 0 8 4 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Kobelco SK55SRX vs Takeuchi TB260: A Comparison of Compact Excavators MikePhua 0 5 4 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  ASV VT-70: A Detailed Overview and Troubleshooting Guide MikePhua 0 7 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Case 9060, Sumitomo 2800, and Link-Belt Excavators: A Comparison of Reliability and Performance MikePhua 0 11 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Differences Between the 1998 Case 580SL Series 1 and Series 2 MikePhua 0 5 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Can the Allison TT2420-1 Transmission Replace the TT2221-1 in a Case W20B Loader MikePhua 0 5 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hough International H-70 Loader Overview MikePhua 0 6 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 902 Compact Wheel Loader Overview MikePhua 0 4 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Understanding the 1999 JCB 185 Skid Steer Loader MikePhua 0 6 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Case 850D Crawler Dozer: Insights and Key Considerations MikePhua 0 7 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Track or Wheel Loader for Farm Use MikePhua 0 10 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Comparing CAT 928HZ and Hyundai 757-9: Which Loader is the Better Option? MikePhua 0 4 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Is the Case W24C Worth Buying MikePhua 0 5 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Michigan L190 Loader Overview and Insights MikePhua 0 6 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Case 580E Parts and Maintenance Guide MikePhua 0 7 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)