Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bobcat 863 vs Case 1845C: A Detailed Comparison of Two Skid Steer Machines
#1
When selecting a skid steer loader for construction, landscaping, or any other type of heavy-duty work, the choice between the Bobcat 863 and the Case 1845C is one that many operators face. Both of these machines are highly regarded for their performance, reliability, and versatility, but they have distinct differences that make them better suited for different applications.
In this article, we will break down the features, capabilities, and limitations of the Bobcat 863 and Case 1845C to help you make an informed decision.
Overview of the Bobcat 863
The Bobcat 863 is a mid-sized skid steer that has been designed to perform well in a variety of settings. Known for its robustness and reliability, the 863 offers a balance between power and versatility, making it a great choice for tasks ranging from landscaping to construction and demolition.
  • Engine Power: The Bobcat 863 is equipped with a 64 horsepower engine, which provides ample power for many jobs. This engine size allows for lifting and pushing heavy materials, as well as operating larger attachments.
  • Operating Weight: The Bobcat 863 weighs around 6,100 pounds, which places it in the mid-range for skid steers. This operating weight allows it to offer stability while still being light enough to navigate tighter spaces.
  • Hydraulic Power: The Bobcat 863 is known for its high-flow hydraulics, offering 23.2 gallons per minute (GPM) of flow. This high-flow option is ideal for running attachments like hydraulic breakers, trenchers, or augers.
  • Lift Capacity: One of the standout features of the 863 is its vertical lift path, which provides a high lifting height and optimal reach, especially when lifting heavy materials onto higher platforms like trucks or trailers.
  • Operator Comfort: The 863 is designed for ease of operation with a spacious cabin, clear sightlines, and comfortable controls. The suspension system adds extra comfort, especially on rough terrains.
Key Advantages of the Bobcat 863
  • High lifting capacity for its size
  • Impressive hydraulic power for a variety of attachments
  • Excellent operator comfort
  • Versatility with attachments
  • Strong reputation for reliability
Potential Limitations
  • The 863 may be more expensive than some competitors for similar specs.
  • The ride can be a bit rough without advanced suspension features.

Overview of the Case 1845C
The Case 1845C is another popular skid steer loader, especially known for its compact design and durability. This machine is often favored for its ability to operate in small, confined spaces while still delivering strong performance.
  • Engine Power: The Case 1845C is powered by a 60 horsepower engine, slightly less than the Bobcat 863, but still provides enough power for most mid-sized tasks. This engine can efficiently handle loads and attachments for various work environments.
  • Operating Weight: With an operating weight of around 5,500 pounds, the Case 1845C is more lightweight compared to the Bobcat 863. Its lighter frame gives it greater maneuverability in tight spaces, but may reduce its stability when dealing with heavier loads.
  • Hydraulic Power: The Case 1845C delivers 17 GPM of hydraulic flow, which is somewhat lower than the Bobcat 863’s 23 GPM. However, this is still sufficient for running standard attachments like forks, buckets, and smaller hydraulic tools.
  • Lift Capacity: The Case 1845C is equipped with a radial lift path, which provides adequate lift for most applications, but lacks the extended reach of the Bobcat 863. Its lift capacity is slightly lower, but the compact design makes it ideal for situations where space is limited.
  • Operator Comfort: The 1845C offers a decent level of operator comfort, but the cab is smaller compared to the Bobcat 863. Still, it is equipped with clear controls, and the ride is stable for everyday tasks.
Key Advantages of the Case 1845C
  • Excellent maneuverability due to its compact size
  • Lower operating weight, making it suitable for confined spaces
  • Lower cost compared to competitors in its class
  • Solid build quality and reliability
  • Suitable for general tasks without requiring high hydraulic power
Potential Limitations
  • Lower hydraulic flow compared to competitors
  • Slightly less powerful engine
  • Radial lift path limits reach and lifting height

Comparing Performance: Bobcat 863 vs Case 1845C
Hydraulic Performance
One of the main differences between the Bobcat 863 and the Case 1845C lies in their hydraulic systems. The Bobcat 863’s higher flow rate (23.2 GPM) allows it to run larger, more powerful attachments with greater efficiency, such as high-flow snow blowers, stump grinders, or brush cutters. This makes the 863 a better option for operators who frequently use hydraulic-driven attachments.
In contrast, the Case 1845C, with its 17 GPM hydraulic flow, may struggle with high-demand attachments. However, for standard tasks like lifting, digging, or simple material handling, the Case 1845C performs adequately. It is best suited for less demanding applications, where the need for hydraulic power is lower.
Lift Capacity
When it comes to lift capacity, the Bobcat 863 is the clear winner. Its vertical lift path allows for a higher lift height and increased reach. This is especially helpful when loading materials into higher vehicles like trucks or unloading from flatbeds.
The Case 1845C, with its radial lift path, offers good lifting power but has a more limited reach. For operators working in areas where lifting height is important, the Bobcat 863 is the better choice.
Size and Maneuverability
The Case 1845C’s lighter weight and compact design give it an edge in tight spaces. If you're working in an area with limited room to maneuver, such as narrow construction sites or urban landscaping projects, the Case 1845C is more agile and can access spaces the Bobcat 863 may struggle with. The 863, being heavier, offers more stability but may be more cumbersome in restricted environments.

Cost Considerations
Cost is often a determining factor when deciding between the Bobcat 863 and Case 1845C. The Bobcat 863, with its greater hydraulic flow, lift capacity, and overall power, typically comes at a higher price point. It’s ideal for more demanding, larger-scale operations.
The Case 1845C, on the other hand, is more budget-friendly. While it doesn’t have the same power and hydraulic performance as the Bobcat 863, its lower price makes it a great option for businesses looking for a reliable, compact skid steer for lighter tasks.

Which One is Right for You?
  • Go for the Bobcat 863 if:
    • You require high hydraulic flow for demanding attachments.
    • You need a higher lift height and better reach for loading/unloading.
    • Stability and power are crucial for your tasks.
    • You are willing to invest in a more expensive, versatile machine.
  • Go for the Case 1845C if:
    • You are working in confined spaces or smaller work areas.
    • You don’t require high hydraulic flow or massive lifting capacity.
    • Budget is a significant concern, but you still need a reliable and durable machine.
    • You need a lighter, more compact skid steer for general work.
Final Thoughts
Both the Bobcat 863 and Case 1845C offer reliable performance in their respective categories. The Bobcat 863 is suited for operators who need robust performance, high lift capacity, and the ability to run powerful attachments. Meanwhile, the Case 1845C shines in tight spaces, offering solid performance for lighter tasks and a more budget-conscious price point.
Choosing the right skid steer for your needs ultimately depends on your workload, budget, and preference for hydraulic power and maneuverability.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Restoring and Operating a Case 1845C Skid Steer with Confidence MikePhua 0 8 Yesterday, 11:19 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Preventing Fire Hazards on the 2014 CAT 289D Skid Steer MikePhua 0 9 Yesterday, 06:37 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Skid Loader for Heavy Mat Handling MikePhua 0 5 Yesterday, 06:32 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Exploring the Case 1155E Wheel Loader MikePhua 0 4 Yesterday, 06:31 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Why Are Compact Wheel Loaders More Popular Than Skid Steers in Europe MikePhua 0 6 Yesterday, 05:58 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Case 580B in 1972 A Milestone in Backhoe Evolution MikePhua 0 4 Yesterday, 05:36 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar D8, D9, and D10 Dozers: A Comparison of Heavy Equipment Giants MikePhua 0 13 Yesterday, 02:54 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  1988 Case 1845 Skid Steer: Features, Common Issues, and Troubleshooting MikePhua 0 13 Yesterday, 02:07 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Is There a Case Tractor Equivalent to the Ford 545D MikePhua 0 13 Yesterday, 02:05 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Optimizing Drum Swaps on Wirtgen Milling Machines MikePhua 0 13 Yesterday, 01:56 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Exploring the 2011 CAT 262C Skid Steer Loader MikePhua 0 14 Yesterday, 01:15 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Understanding the 1994 Case 580 SK Tractor Loader MikePhua 0 13 Yesterday, 01:14 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Case CX210: An Overview of Performance and Common Issues MikePhua 0 15 Yesterday, 01:06 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Locating and Interpreting the Fuse Layout for the Case 435 Series 3 Skid Steer MikePhua 0 14 Yesterday, 01:02 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Using the Decelerator Pedal on Caterpillar Skid Steers MikePhua 0 15 Yesterday, 01:01 PM
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)