Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The History of the First Hydraulic Excavator:Who invented the excavator?
#1
The concept of using hydraulic power for more efficient digging in excavators began to take shape in the 1880s. One of the earliest attempts to incorporate hydraulic technology into excavation equipment was the 1882 excavator built by Sir W. G. Armstrong & Company in England. This machine was used in the construction of the Hull Docks. However, unlike modern excavators that use hydraulic fluid, this machine operated with water as the hydraulic fluid. Additionally, it was not a fully hydraulic machine, but a hybrid design that used cables to operate the bucket and a hydraulic cylinder to operate a set of multiplying sheaves. Unfortunately, this idea was not successful, and neither was a similar machine built in 1914 by Frank F. Armstrong for the Penn Iron Mining Company in the United States.

   


The First True Hydraulic Excavator: Kilgore's Innovation
The first all-hydraulic excavator was created by the Kilgore Machine Company in 1897. This machine, called the Direct Acting Excavator, used four direct-acting steam cylinders for all bucket functions, eliminating the need for cables or chains, which were commonly used in conventional excavators at the time. This design marked a significant breakthrough in hydraulic excavation technology.
Kilgore’s design had several notable advantages:
  • The excavator was made almost entirely of steel, making it robust and durable.
  • All movements, including the full stroke of each cylinder, were cushioned, preventing shock or damage even when operating at high speeds and full stroke.
  • The use of steam cylinders for all bucket functions provided a greater range of motion than typical cable-operated machines, allowing the bucket to crowd horizontally and manipulate larger obstacles such as boulders with greater ease.

Kilgore’s Direct Acting Excavator: Advanced Features
Kilgore’s Direct Acting Excavator was ahead of its time in many ways:
  • The machine had equal power in all movements, allowing the bucket to be withdrawn under load without having to lift it to the top to clear the cut, a major advantage over conventional shovels.
  • In the event the shovel derailed, the machine’s design allowed for the full application of power to lift it back onto the rails, a feature not seen in traditional machines.
  • The dipper could be forcefully shaken with the cylinders to dislodge materials jammed inside, improving operational efficiency.
Moreover, by eliminating complex parts such as chains, cables, sheaves, drums, friction clutches, gears, and hoisting engines, the machine’s design was simplified with fewer working parts. The operation was equally straightforward, controlled by two levers, with the engineer’s hand motion directly duplicated at the bucket. Additionally, instead of using a trip rope or lever, a foot pedal was used to dump the bucket, foreshadowing the full-revolving excavators that would emerge in the 20th century.

Kilgore’s Economic Advantage and Limited Success
Kilgore also marketed its machine’s economy of operation, noting that the cylinders required less steam, which translated into reduced fuel and water consumption compared to other traditional shovels. Moreover, the engineer operated all functions of the machine, eliminating the need for a second crew member to operate the dipper as in conventional machines.
Kilgore produced several railroad shovels with dipper capacities of 1-1/4 and 2-1/2 yards. They also created traction wheel shovels, steam ditchers for land reclamation and irrigation, and dipper dredges. Despite the advanced concepts, Kilgore’s Direct Acting Excavator met with limited success due to various factors, including competition from other established technologies and the limitations of the design at the time.

Conclusion
While Kilgore’s Direct Acting Excavator was a groundbreaking innovation in hydraulic technology, it did not achieve widespread commercial success. Nevertheless, it played an important role in the development of modern hydraulic excavators. The innovations introduced in this machine, such as cable-free operation, direct-acting cylinders, and more efficient energy use, laid the groundwork for future advancements in the field of excavation machinery.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Hitachi EX100-2 Excavator: Comprehensive Overview and Troubleshooting Guide MikePhua 0 1 18 minutes ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  CAT 235C: A Robust Excavator for Heavy-Duty Work MikePhua 0 1 25 minutes ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Excavator Questions and Insights on Performance Issues MikePhua 0 1 57 minutes ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Kubota U10-3: A Compact and Powerful Mini Excavator MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Used Excavator for Your Needs MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  The Trojan Tractor Shovel: A Look at its History, Performance, and Applications MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Understanding Hydraulic Systems in Heavy Equipment MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu PC128 Excavator: Features, Performance, and Operator Insights MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Takeuchi TB135 Mini Excavator: Bucket Sizing and Key Considerations MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hitachi ZX160LC Excavator: Features, Troubleshooting, and Maintenance MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Akerman H7MC: A Detailed Review of the Hydraulic Crawler Excavator MikePhua 0 1 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Samsung SE210LC-3 Hydraulic Excavator Overview MikePhua 0 1 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  John Deere 190E Mid-Size Excavator Overview MikePhua 0 1 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu PC50UU-2 Mini Excavator Overview MikePhua 0 1 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Excavator Comparison and Insights MikePhua 0 1 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)