Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Clark 55C Loader Offers Rugged Performance but Requires Serial Number Decoding for Accurate Identification
#1
Clark Equipment Company and the Evolution of Wheel Loaders
Founded in 1916, Clark Equipment Company was a pioneer in the development of industrial and construction machinery. By the 1970s and 1980s, Clark had established a strong presence in the wheel loader market, competing with brands like Caterpillar, Michigan, and John Deere. The Clark 55C was part of the “C” series lineup, which included models like the 35C, 45C, and 275C. These machines were known for their robust frames, mechanical simplicity, and high breakout force, making them popular in quarries, logging yards, and municipal fleets.
The 55C was designed as a mid-size loader, offering a balance between lifting capacity and maneuverability. It featured a torque converter transmission, hydraulic steering, and a spacious operator cab with analog gauges and mechanical levers. Production of the “C” series generally spanned from 1979 to 1986, though exact build dates can be difficult to confirm due to inconsistent serial number formatting.
Serial Number Challenges and Identification Tips
The serial number format used by Clark during this period often included a mix of letters and numbers, such as “481B285CB.” Decoding these numbers is not straightforward, as Clark did not publish a consistent serial number guide across all models. Based on historical data and comparisons with similar machines, a loader with a serial number in this format likely falls between 1983 and 1986.
To narrow down the build year:
  • Compare the serial number against known production ranges for other “C” series models
  • Contact vintage equipment specialists or Clark legacy dealers who may have archived records
  • Inspect the engine plate and transmission tag for secondary date codes
  • Look for stamped dates on hydraulic cylinders or frame weldments
One technician in South Carolina noted that Clark’s numbering system “skips all over the place,” making it difficult to guarantee accuracy without factory documentation.
Mechanical Features and Performance Highlights
Key specifications for the Clark 55C include:
  • Engine: Typically powered by a Cummins or Detroit Diesel inline-six
  • Horsepower: Approximately 150–180 hp depending on configuration
  • Operating Weight: Around 28,000–32,000 lbs
  • Bucket Capacity: 3.0–3.5 cubic yards
  • Transmission: Powershift with 4 forward and 3 reverse speeds
  • Hydraulics: Open-center system with gear-type pump
These loaders were praised for their ability to handle heavy material loads while maintaining stability on uneven terrain. The rigid frame and wide stance made them ideal for gravel pits and log yards, where traction and lifting power were critical.
Maintenance Considerations and Parts Availability
Due to their age, Clark 55C loaders require diligent maintenance and creative sourcing of parts. Common issues include:
  • Hydraulic leaks from aged seals and hoses
  • Transmission hesitation due to worn clutch packs
  • Electrical faults in analog gauge clusters
  • Brake system wear, especially in wet disc setups
Recommended solutions:
  • Replace hydraulic lines with modern braided hose rated for high pressure
  • Use aftermarket transmission rebuild kits compatible with Clark drivetrains
  • Retrofit LED gauges or install external sensors for temperature and pressure monitoring
  • Upgrade brake fluid to DOT 4 for better heat resistance
Some owners have successfully adapted parts from Michigan and Volvo loaders, which share similar drivetrain components due to historical mergers and acquisitions.
Conclusion
The Clark 55C loader remains a capable and durable machine for operators who appreciate mechanical simplicity and raw power. While serial number decoding can be tricky, most units fall within the early to mid-1980s production window. With proper maintenance and a bit of ingenuity, these loaders continue to serve in demanding environments, proving that legacy equipment still has a place in modern operations.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Caterpillar D300E Remains a Rugged Performer but Demands Attention to Transmission and Brake Systems MikePhua 0 9 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Bobcat T770 Compact Track Loader Overview and Key Insights MikePhua 0 10 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu PC50UU-2E Offers Compact Power but Demands Vigilant Maintenance of Hydraulic and Electrical Systems MikePhua 0 9 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  CAT 931 Track Loader Remains a Durable Workhorse but Requires Careful Attention to Powertrain Components MikePhua 0 11 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  TCI 4x4 Forklift Identification And Restoration Story MikePhua 0 15 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Pel-Job EB306 Mini Excavator Identification And Ownership Challenges MikePhua 0 11 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Bobcat S250 Skid‑Steer Loader: In‑Depth Analysis MikePhua 0 23 11-16-2025, 07:23 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Takeuchi TL120 Compact Track Loader – Detailed Analysis MikePhua 0 26 11-16-2025, 07:20 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 420F Backhoe Loader – Key Insights and Considerations MikePhua 0 15 11-16-2025, 07:17 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Evaluating the 2007 Komatsu WA150 Wheel Loader for Multi-Use Operations MikePhua 0 17 11-16-2025, 07:09 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Overview of the Bobcat S220 Skid-Steer Loader MikePhua 0 24 11-16-2025, 05:31 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  How to Perform a Drive Pressure Check on a Caterpillar 943 Track Loader MikePhua 0 19 11-16-2025, 02:27 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  John Deere 710B Backhoe Loader Detailed Overview MikePhua 0 20 11-15-2025, 01:26 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Case 855D Track Loader Reliability and Inspection Priorities MikePhua 0 22 11-14-2025, 02:21 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  CAT Serial Numbers and Equipment Identification Practices MikePhua 0 27 11-14-2025, 02:06 PM
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)