Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Cat 299D3 vs Deere 333G Which Compact Track Loader Performs Better
#1
Brand Background and Loader Evolution
Caterpillar and John Deere are two of the most recognized names in heavy equipment, each with decades of innovation and global reach. The Cat 299D3 is part of Caterpillar’s D3 series, launched to improve operator comfort, electronic integration, and hydraulic performance. John Deere’s 333G belongs to the G-series, which emphasizes power, emissions compliance, and versatility in attachments.
Both machines are high-end compact track loaders (CTLs), designed for demanding tasks like grading, brush cutting, snow removal, and soil conditioning. Their popularity stems from strong dealer networks, robust resale value, and compatibility with a wide range of attachments.
Terminology Notes
  • CTL (Compact Track Loader): A tracked machine used for earthmoving and material handling, offering better traction than wheeled skid steers.
  • Suspended Undercarriage: A track system with torsion axles and pivoting rollers that absorb shock and improve ride quality.
  • Boom Multitasking: The ability to operate lift arms and travel simultaneously without loss of speed or hydraulic power.
  • Emissions System: A set of components that reduce engine pollutants, often requiring specific operating conditions to avoid clogging or failure.
Performance and Operator Experience
Operators who tested the Cat 299D3 noted that it maintained ground speed while multitasking with the boom—an area where older Bobcat models struggled. The controls felt precise, with minimal drift, making it easier to perform fine grading or operate attachments like soil conditioners.
The Deere 333G, especially the 2017 model, impressed users with its breakout force and raw power. While slightly noisier and rougher on hard ground, it rarely derailed even in harsh terrain. One operator reported only a single track jump after extensive use on worn-out tracks.
The newer 333G models offer a suspended undercarriage with torsion axles and pivoting rollers, improving ride comfort and reducing vibration. This feature is optional but recommended for operators working on uneven or rocky surfaces.
Control Modes and Emissions Management
The 333G includes selectable control modes: precision, utility, and production. These modes adjust responsiveness and hydraulic flow, allowing operators to tailor performance to the task. For example, precision mode is ideal for grading, while production mode suits aggressive digging.
Running at idle for extended periods can harm the emissions system, especially on newer machines. Operators accustomed to older non-emissions models may overlook this, leading to costly repairs. Understanding and using the control modes properly helps prevent soot buildup and ensures compliance with Tier 4 Final standards.
Maintenance and Undercarriage Care
The Cat 299D3 requires frequent greasing of its undercarriage—every 6 to 8 hours—to maintain performance. Neglecting this can make it difficult to inject grease later due to hardened debris or misalignment. Deere’s undercarriage, while less demanding, still benefits from regular inspection and tension checks.
Recommendations for Buyers
  • Choose Cat 299D3 if you prioritize multitasking, smooth controls, and electronic integration
  • Choose Deere 333G if you need breakout force, undercarriage durability, and control mode flexibility
  • Opt for suspended undercarriage on the 333G if working on rough terrain
  • Avoid extended idling on either machine to protect emissions systems
  • Grease undercarriage regularly and monitor track wear to prevent derailment
Conclusion
Both the Cat 299D3 and Deere 333G are top-tier compact track loaders with distinct strengths. The Cat excels in control precision and multitasking, while the Deere offers raw power and customizable control modes. The choice depends on terrain, task type, and operator preference—but either machine, when properly maintained, delivers reliable performance across seasons and job sites.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Choosing Between Cat 228, Cat 246, and John Deere 317 MikePhua 0 141 01-07-2026, 06:28 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Locating Wiring Information for the Hough H30 Loader MikePhua 0 128 01-07-2026, 06:24 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  John Deere VIN Lookup MikePhua 0 163 01-04-2026, 06:13 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Checking Belt Alignment on a John Deere 490E MikePhua 0 238 12-31-2025, 07:16 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  1997 CASE 580 Super L Series 2 Backhoe Loader Performance and Common Issues MikePhua 0 161 12-30-2025, 08:21 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Measuring Track Chain Wear MikePhua 0 94 12-29-2025, 03:41 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu PC07‑1 Track Installation and Adjustment MikePhua 0 88 12-29-2025, 03:27 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  John Deere 200D LC Wiring System and Service Manual Importance MikePhua 0 173 12-27-2025, 08:21 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  LeeBoy 8515 Track Wear Problems MikePhua 0 90 12-27-2025, 07:16 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  John Deere 850C Transmission Calibration MikePhua 0 172 12-25-2025, 08:47 AM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Boom Down Cavitation Noise in Deere 160DLC MikePhua 0 191 12-15-2025, 03:54 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Experience with a 1973 Case 450 Loader MikePhua 0 134 12-08-2025, 09:16 AM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Considering a 1995 John Deere 410D Backhoe Loader MikePhua 0 191 12-02-2025, 02:53 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Tragic Incident Involving Track Hoe Theft MikePhua 0 190 11-19-2025, 04:15 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hough 65C Loader Sensor Configuration Reflects Transitional Design in Mid-1980s Heavy Equipment MikePhua 0 210 11-17-2025, 07:07 PM
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)