8 hours ago
Evolution of the Volvo L70 Series
The Volvo L70E and L70F wheel loaders represent two successive generations in Volvo Construction Equipment’s mid-size loader lineup. The L70E was introduced in the early 2000s, followed by the L70F around 2007. Volvo CE, founded in 1832 and headquartered in Sweden, has long emphasized operator comfort, fuel efficiency, and hydraulic precision. By the time the L70F was released, Volvo had already integrated Tier 3 emissions compliance and more advanced electronic control systems across its loader range. Both models were widely adopted in cement plants, quarries, and municipal fleets, with thousands sold globally.
Engine and Emissions Differences
Hydraulics and Transmission Performance
Both models use Volvo’s load-sensing hydraulic system, but the L70F features refined spool control and smoother joystick response. Transmission reliability varies:
Onboard Electronics and Operator Interface
Parts Compatibility and Dealer Support
Volvo maintained strong parts continuity between the E and F series. Many components—such as axles, cab structures, and hydraulic cylinders—are interchangeable or similar. However, electronic modules and emissions-related parts differ significantly.
A fleet manager in Dubai ran L90Fs in a cement plant and noted their tendency to blow hydraulic pipes and suffer head gasket failures. Despite this, the loaders performed well overall. He considered switching to L70E units for simplicity but acknowledged the F series’ strength and versatility.
In Pennsylvania, two L70Es were retired after transmission failures. One failed completely at 8,000 hours, and its replacement lasted less than 1,000 hours. The second unit showed signs of wear but remained operational. Both were traded in after warranty replacements.
Recommendations for Buyers
The Volvo L70E and L70F loaders each offer distinct advantages depending on operating conditions and maintenance preferences. While the L70F introduces refinements in hydraulics and electronics, the L70E remains a favorite for reliability and simplicity. Understanding the trade-offs between emissions compliance, diagnostics, and mechanical durability is key to selecting the right machine for long-term productivity.
The Volvo L70E and L70F wheel loaders represent two successive generations in Volvo Construction Equipment’s mid-size loader lineup. The L70E was introduced in the early 2000s, followed by the L70F around 2007. Volvo CE, founded in 1832 and headquartered in Sweden, has long emphasized operator comfort, fuel efficiency, and hydraulic precision. By the time the L70F was released, Volvo had already integrated Tier 3 emissions compliance and more advanced electronic control systems across its loader range. Both models were widely adopted in cement plants, quarries, and municipal fleets, with thousands sold globally.
Engine and Emissions Differences
- L70E: Equipped with a Tier 2-compliant Volvo D6D engine, producing around 150 horsepower. Known for mechanical simplicity and fewer electronic components.
- L70F: Upgraded to a Tier 3-compliant D6E engine with similar power output but improved fuel mapping and emissions control.
Hydraulics and Transmission Performance
Both models use Volvo’s load-sensing hydraulic system, but the L70F features refined spool control and smoother joystick response. Transmission reliability varies:
- L70E: Some units experienced transmission failure around 8,000 hours. In one case, a replacement failed again within 1,000 hours, prompting a warranty claim and eventual trade-in.
- L70F: Transmission design was updated, though not significantly different in layout. Hydraulic pipe failures and head gasket issues have been reported under extreme heat and heavy-duty cycles.
Onboard Electronics and Operator Interface
- L70E: Basic electronic interface with analog gauges and limited diagnostics. Easier to troubleshoot manually.
- L70F: Enhanced onboard computer with digital display, fault logging, and programmable settings. Offers better feedback but requires more technical knowledge to service.
Parts Compatibility and Dealer Support
Volvo maintained strong parts continuity between the E and F series. Many components—such as axles, cab structures, and hydraulic cylinders—are interchangeable or similar. However, electronic modules and emissions-related parts differ significantly.
- Transmission cost: Replacement for the L70E was reported at $28,000 including cooler.
- Hydraulic hoses and seals: More prone to failure in the L70F under high heat, but easier to source due to standardized fittings.
A fleet manager in Dubai ran L90Fs in a cement plant and noted their tendency to blow hydraulic pipes and suffer head gasket failures. Despite this, the loaders performed well overall. He considered switching to L70E units for simplicity but acknowledged the F series’ strength and versatility.
In Pennsylvania, two L70Es were retired after transmission failures. One failed completely at 8,000 hours, and its replacement lasted less than 1,000 hours. The second unit showed signs of wear but remained operational. Both were traded in after warranty replacements.
Recommendations for Buyers
- Choose L70E if you prioritize mechanical simplicity, lower electronic dependency, and easier field repairs.
- Choose L70F if you need better diagnostics, smoother hydraulics, and emissions compliance for regulated environments.
- Inspect transmission history before purchase, especially for units over 6,000 hours.
- Upgrade hydraulic lines with heat-resistant materials if operating in high-temperature zones.
- Keep spare sensors and diagnostic tools for F-series units to reduce downtime.
The Volvo L70E and L70F loaders each offer distinct advantages depending on operating conditions and maintenance preferences. While the L70F introduces refinements in hydraulics and electronics, the L70E remains a favorite for reliability and simplicity. Understanding the trade-offs between emissions compliance, diagnostics, and mechanical durability is key to selecting the right machine for long-term productivity.
