Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Choosing Between the Caterpillar 977K and 973 Track Loaders for Land Clearing
#1
Machine Overview and Historical Context
The Caterpillar 977K and 973 represent two distinct generations of track loaders. The 977K, introduced in the 1970s, is a mechanically driven machine with a front-mounted engine and clutch-brake steering. It was part of Caterpillar’s long-running 977 series, which began in the 1950s and became a staple in heavy construction and land clearing. The 973, launched in the late 1980s, belongs to the hydrostatic-drive family and features a rear-mounted engine, improved visibility, and electronic controls. It was designed for versatility in grading, loading, and demolition.
While the 977K is known for its brute strength and simplicity, the 973 offers smoother operation, better fuel efficiency, and easier maintenance due to its hydrostatic transmission. Caterpillar sold thousands of units from both series, with the 973 remaining in production through several updates, including the 973C and 973D.
Performance and Application Differences
  • Engine and Power:
    • 977K: Approximately 200 hp, mechanical transmission
    • 973: Around 225 hp, hydrostatic drive with variable speed control
  • Operating Weight:
    • 977K: ~50,000 lbs
    • 973: ~60,000 lbs
  • Undercarriage:
    • 977K: Conventional track frame with higher maintenance needs
    • 973: Improved sealed and lubricated track system (SALT)
  • Visibility and Ergonomics:
  • 977K: Limited rear visibility, basic cab
  • 973: Enhanced operator station, better sightlines, joystick controls
For clearing 15-year regrowth on a 67-acre property, both machines are capable. However, the 973’s hydrostatic drive allows for finer control when maneuvering around stumps and trees, while the 977K’s raw torque may be better suited for pushing large debris.
Cost and Ownership Considerations
In one comparison, a 977K was priced at $5,500 with 30% undercarriage remaining, while a 973 was listed at $16,500 with similar wear. While the 977K is significantly cheaper upfront, its mechanical systems may require more frequent adjustment and parts replacement. Hydrostatic machines like the 973 are easier to operate and maintain—until major components like pumps or motors fail, which can be costly.
  • Typical Undercarriage Replacement Costs:
    • 977K: $12,000–$18,000
    • 973: $18,000–$25,000
  • Fuel Consumption:
    • 977K: Higher due to older engine design
    • 973: More efficient, especially under variable load
  • Transport Logistics:
  • Both machines require lowboy trailers and permits due to weight
  • Smaller machines like the 943 or 953 may be more mobile and easier to move for side jobs
Operator Experience and Learning Curve
For operators accustomed to automatic transmissions and hydrostatic lawn equipment, the 973 offers a more intuitive experience. The 977K’s clutch-brake system demands more skill and physical effort, especially in tight spaces. However, some experienced operators prefer the mechanical feedback and durability of older machines.
Alternative Recommendations
If mobility and fuel economy are priorities, consider:
  • Caterpillar 943 or 953: Lighter, easier to transport, still powerful
  • John Deere 555 or 655: Compact, reliable, and often cheaper to maintain
  • Machines with 4-in-1 buckets: Great for land clearing, root grabbing, and grading
Conclusion
Choosing between the Caterpillar 977K and 973 depends on budget, operator preference, and long-term goals. The 977K offers affordability and raw power but demands more maintenance and skill. The 973 provides smoother operation and better ergonomics at a higher upfront cost. For landowners planning to expand into contract work, a mid-sized hydrostatic loader may offer the best balance of performance, transportability, and resale value.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  CAT B Model Wheel Loaders Good Or Bad MikePhua 0 54 11-28-2025, 02:16 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Motor Grader Depends on Application, Drive Configuration, and Operator Comfort MikePhua 0 84 11-19-2025, 05:10 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar Technical Manuals Remain Indispensable for Equipment Owners and Mechanics MikePhua 0 68 11-19-2025, 05:05 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Tragic Incident Involving Track Hoe Theft MikePhua 0 81 11-19-2025, 04:15 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Excavator Size Depends on Hauling Limits, Job Scope, and Terrain MikePhua 0 74 11-19-2025, 03:40 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 426B Backhoe Manuals And The Hidden Value Of Paper Knowledge MikePhua 0 76 11-17-2025, 06:00 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Cranking Power and Electrical Stability in the Caterpillar D9T Dozer MikePhua 0 76 11-16-2025, 07:18 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Evaluating the Caterpillar 216 Skid Steer Loader for Long-Term Use MikePhua 0 90 11-16-2025, 06:57 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Mastering the Art of Operating the Caterpillar 385 Series Excavators MikePhua 0 79 11-16-2025, 06:46 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right 20-Ton Tag Trailer for Heavy Equipment Hauling MikePhua 0 83 11-16-2025, 02:42 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Evaluating a High-Hour CAT 953C Track Loader for Landfill and Farm Use MikePhua 0 74 11-16-2025, 02:34 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Creative and Unconventional Uses for Wheel Loaders MikePhua 0 74 11-16-2025, 02:14 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Wholesale Price Considerations for Caterpillar D9N vs D9R Dozers MikePhua 0 77 11-15-2025, 01:29 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Throttle Linkage Tension on a Caterpillar D4D 78A MikePhua 0 72 11-15-2025, 12:33 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar Hydraulic Strainers and the Hidden Impact of Contamination MikePhua 0 74 11-15-2025, 12:14 PM
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)