Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Choosing Between the Caterpillar 977K and 973 Track Loaders for Land Clearing
#1
Machine Overview and Historical Context
The Caterpillar 977K and 973 represent two distinct generations of track loaders. The 977K, introduced in the 1970s, is a mechanically driven machine with a front-mounted engine and clutch-brake steering. It was part of Caterpillar’s long-running 977 series, which began in the 1950s and became a staple in heavy construction and land clearing. The 973, launched in the late 1980s, belongs to the hydrostatic-drive family and features a rear-mounted engine, improved visibility, and electronic controls. It was designed for versatility in grading, loading, and demolition.
While the 977K is known for its brute strength and simplicity, the 973 offers smoother operation, better fuel efficiency, and easier maintenance due to its hydrostatic transmission. Caterpillar sold thousands of units from both series, with the 973 remaining in production through several updates, including the 973C and 973D.
Performance and Application Differences
  • Engine and Power:
    • 977K: Approximately 200 hp, mechanical transmission
    • 973: Around 225 hp, hydrostatic drive with variable speed control
  • Operating Weight:
    • 977K: ~50,000 lbs
    • 973: ~60,000 lbs
  • Undercarriage:
    • 977K: Conventional track frame with higher maintenance needs
    • 973: Improved sealed and lubricated track system (SALT)
  • Visibility and Ergonomics:
  • 977K: Limited rear visibility, basic cab
  • 973: Enhanced operator station, better sightlines, joystick controls
For clearing 15-year regrowth on a 67-acre property, both machines are capable. However, the 973’s hydrostatic drive allows for finer control when maneuvering around stumps and trees, while the 977K’s raw torque may be better suited for pushing large debris.
Cost and Ownership Considerations
In one comparison, a 977K was priced at $5,500 with 30% undercarriage remaining, while a 973 was listed at $16,500 with similar wear. While the 977K is significantly cheaper upfront, its mechanical systems may require more frequent adjustment and parts replacement. Hydrostatic machines like the 973 are easier to operate and maintain—until major components like pumps or motors fail, which can be costly.
  • Typical Undercarriage Replacement Costs:
    • 977K: $12,000–$18,000
    • 973: $18,000–$25,000
  • Fuel Consumption:
    • 977K: Higher due to older engine design
    • 973: More efficient, especially under variable load
  • Transport Logistics:
  • Both machines require lowboy trailers and permits due to weight
  • Smaller machines like the 943 or 953 may be more mobile and easier to move for side jobs
Operator Experience and Learning Curve
For operators accustomed to automatic transmissions and hydrostatic lawn equipment, the 973 offers a more intuitive experience. The 977K’s clutch-brake system demands more skill and physical effort, especially in tight spaces. However, some experienced operators prefer the mechanical feedback and durability of older machines.
Alternative Recommendations
If mobility and fuel economy are priorities, consider:
  • Caterpillar 943 or 953: Lighter, easier to transport, still powerful
  • John Deere 555 or 655: Compact, reliable, and often cheaper to maintain
  • Machines with 4-in-1 buckets: Great for land clearing, root grabbing, and grading
Conclusion
Choosing between the Caterpillar 977K and 973 depends on budget, operator preference, and long-term goals. The 977K offers affordability and raw power but demands more maintenance and skill. The 973 provides smoother operation and better ergonomics at a higher upfront cost. For landowners planning to expand into contract work, a mid-sized hydrostatic loader may offer the best balance of performance, transportability, and resale value.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Legacy and Tire Configurations of the Caterpillar 660 and 666 Scrapers MikePhua 0 8 4 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Skid Loader for Heavy Mat Handling MikePhua 0 5 4 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Fluid Requirements for Old Caterpillar Equipment MikePhua 0 8 4 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Is the Caterpillar D3B Still a Worthwhile Investment MikePhua 0 9 4 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Why Are Compact Wheel Loaders More Popular Than Skid Steers in Europe MikePhua 0 6 4 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Identifying a Caterpillar D6D with a Damaged Serial Plate MikePhua 0 9 4 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Volvo L70E vs L70F Wheel Loaders in Harsh Operating Conditions MikePhua 0 6 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Mini Excavator: Key Considerations MikePhua 0 10 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Evaluating the Caterpillar 933 Track Loader for Farm and Utility Use MikePhua 0 9 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Track Alignment in Heavy Equipment: Importance, Causes, and Solutions MikePhua 0 9 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Identifying a Vintage Caterpillar Dozer by Serial Number and Engine Type MikePhua 0 7 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 963K: A Powerful All-in-One Machine for Construction MikePhua 0 13 7 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  TL150 vs. TL250: Comparing Two Compact Track Loaders MikePhua 0 12 7 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar D8, D9, and D10 Dozers: A Comparison of Heavy Equipment Giants MikePhua 0 13 7 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Legacy and Mechanics of Hanomag 22C, 33C, and 35D Wheel Loaders MikePhua 0 12 7 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)