Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Adding Counterweight to a CAT 259D Compact Track Loader
#1
Operators looking to increase lifting stability on a CAT 259D often consider adding extra counterweights beyond the factory-installed configuration, but doing so requires careful consideration of structural limits, hydraulic balance, and long-term wear. While the temptation to boost rear ballast for occasional heavy lifts is understandable, it’s essential to weigh the benefits against potential drivetrain and undercarriage stress.
CAT 259D Overview
The Caterpillar 259D is a compact track loader in the D-series lineup, featuring a vertical lift design, 74.3 horsepower engine, and a rated operating capacity of 2,900 pounds with the optional counterweight package. It’s widely used in landscaping, construction, and light material handling. The 259D’s compact footprint and rubber track system make it ideal for soft ground and confined spaces.
Caterpillar, founded in 1925, has long been a leader in compact equipment, and the 259D has been a popular model in North America and Europe due to its versatility and dealer support. The machine comes standard with two counterweights per side, bolted to the rear frame.
Terminology Notes
  • Counterweight Package: Factory-installed steel weights mounted to the rear of the machine to improve lifting stability.
  • Rated Operating Capacity (ROC): The maximum load a machine can safely lift without tipping, typically 35% of the tipping load.
  • Tipping Load: The weight at which the machine begins to lose stability and tip forward.
  • Undercarriage Wear: Long-term degradation of track components due to excessive load or imbalance.
Adding Extra Counterweights
Some operators have experimented with adding two additional weights per side using longer M12 bolts. While this may provide a short-term improvement in lifting capacity—such as lifting demolition derby cars off a gooseneck trailer—it introduces several risks:
  • Bolt Shear Risk: Longer bolts may not adequately support the added mass, especially under vibration or dynamic loads. Without a cradle or bracket, the bolts bear all the stress.
  • Frame Stress: The rear frame is designed for a specific load. Exceeding it can cause cracking or deformation over time.
  • Undercarriage and Drive Motor Wear: Extra weight increases ground pressure and accelerates wear on rollers, sprockets, and final drives.
  • Reduced Maneuverability: Additional rear ballast can affect turning radius and increase tail swing, especially in tight job sites.
Alternative Solutions
  • Use a Larger Machine: If lifting beyond the rated capacity is a regular task, upgrading to a CAT 279D or 289D may be more appropriate.
  • Redistribute Load: Lower the load closer to the ground before moving, or reposition the trailer to reduce lift height.
  • Custom Counterweight Bracket: Fabricate a steel cradle to distribute the load across the frame and reduce bolt stress.
  • Hydraulic Flow Adjustment: Ensure auxiliary hydraulics are tuned for the attachment being used, as improper flow can affect lift performance.
Field Anecdotes and Practical Insight
In Missouri, an operator added extra weights to a Deere 333D and later removed them after noticing increased track wear and sluggish turning. He now runs CAT 299 XHP units with factory ballast only. In South Carolina, a contractor found that simply repositioning the trailer to lower the lift height eliminated the need for extra weight altogether.
Recommendations for Safe Operation
  • Stay Within Rated Capacity: Occasional overloads can become habitual, leading to cumulative damage.
  • Consult Dealer Before Modifications: They can advise on structural limits and offer OEM-approved kits.
  • Monitor Wear Patterns: Check for uneven track wear or hydraulic strain after adding weight.
  • Use Load Charts: Understand how lift height and reach affect tipping risk.
Final Thoughts
While adding counterweight to a CAT 259D may seem like a quick fix for lifting heavier loads, it’s a solution that comes with trade-offs. For infrequent tasks, careful technique and load positioning may suffice. For regular heavy lifting, investing in a larger machine or engineered counterweight system is the safer, more sustainable path.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How to Identify a CAT 953 Track Loader When the Serial Plate Is Worn MikePhua 0 11 3 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Understanding Warning Lights on the CAT 299D3 Compact Track Loader MikePhua 0 12 3 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Compact Track Loader for Long-Term Ownership MikePhua 0 12 3 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Ford 4500 Tractor Loader Overview MikePhua 0 13 3 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Case 580ST Backhoe Loader: A Comprehensive Overview MikePhua 0 11 3 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Where Can You Find a Service Manual for the Fiat-Allis FL8 Track Loader MikePhua 0 11 3 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  CAT 972H Wheel Loader: Overview and Key Considerations MikePhua 0 8 3 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Is Line Boring Worth It for Worn Pin Bosses on Compact Loaders MikePhua 0 9 8 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Should You Buy a New or Used Track Loader for Residential and Utility Work MikePhua 0 8 8 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Takeuchi TL150 Skid Steer Loader Overview MikePhua 0 10 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Michigan 85 Wheeled Loader: A Legacy of Power and Performance MikePhua 0 8 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Was This Custom CAT 939C Track Loader Built for Lettuce Harvesting MikePhua 0 8 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  T86 vs 333G: A Comparison of Two Popular Compact Track Loaders MikePhua 0 7 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 966B Wheel Loader Overview MikePhua 0 5 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Fun and Practical Uses for a Volvo L60E Wheel Loader MikePhua 0 8 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)