Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Takeuchi TB035 or Bobcat X331 for Compact Excavation
#1
Compact Excavator Evolution and Market Context
The compact excavator market expanded rapidly in the 1990s, driven by urban construction, landscaping, and utility trenching. Takeuchi, a Japanese manufacturer founded in 1963, was one of the pioneers of the mini-excavator concept. The TB035, introduced in the late 1990s, became a benchmark for reliability and hydraulic finesse. Bobcat, originally known for its skid-steer loaders, entered the compact excavator segment with the X-series, including the X331, which offered American-built simplicity and parts availability.
By 2000, both models had gained traction in North America, with thousands sold annually. The TB035 was favored by contractors for its smooth controls and robust undercarriage, while the X331 appealed to rental fleets and small operators due to its lower upfront cost and dealer support.
Comparing the TB035 and X331
Two machines from 1998 were recently evaluated:
  • Takeuchi TB035
    • 1,800 hours
    • 24" bucket
    • Repainted, second owner
    • Asking price: $18,000
    • Located 1 hour away
  • Bobcat X331
  • 4,200 hours
  • 18" bucket
  • Original paint, dealership unit
  • Asking price: $16,000
  • Located 5 hours away
While both machines appear mechanically sound, the TB035’s lower hours and proximity offer practical advantages. The X331’s higher hours suggest more wear, particularly in the swing motor, track tensioners, and hydraulic cylinders.
Hydraulic System and Control Feel
The TB035 features a variable displacement hydraulic pump, delivering smoother control and better fuel efficiency. Its pilot-operated joystick system allows precise grading and trenching. The X331 uses a gear pump system, which can feel jerky under load and lacks the finesse of the TB035.
Operators report that the TB035 excels in fine grading and trench backfill, while the X331 performs adequately for demolition and rough digging. The TB035’s boom and arm geometry also provide better reach and dump height, useful for truck loading.
Undercarriage and Structural Durability
Takeuchi machines are known for their heavy-duty undercarriage, with steel track rollers and reinforced track frames. The TB035’s track tensioning system is grease-adjusted, offering reliable performance. Bobcat’s X331 uses a simpler undercarriage, which may wear faster under heavy use.
One contractor in Wisconsin shared that his TB035 ran over 6,000 hours with only minor undercarriage repairs, while his X331 required roller replacement at 3,500 hours. This anecdote reflects broader trends in durability.
Parts Availability and Dealer Support
Bobcat has a larger dealer network in North America, making parts easier to source. However, Takeuchi’s parts are widely available through independent suppliers and online distributors. For older machines, both brands offer aftermarket support, though Bobcat’s proprietary components may be pricier.
Alternative Consideration and Market Caution
A 2010 IHI 35N with 1,800 hours was briefly considered but showed signs of excessive wear inconsistent with its claimed hours. This highlights the importance of hour meter verification, visual inspection, and seller transparency. Machines used in harsh environments like pig barns or demolition sites may age faster than their hour count suggests.
Recommendations for Purchase
  • Prioritize lower-hour machines with clean service history
  • Inspect hydraulic response, undercarriage wear, and boom welds
  • Verify hour meter accuracy through ECU diagnostics or service records
  • Consider transport distance and dealer proximity for future support
  • Use a mechanic or operator test to evaluate real-world performance
Conclusion
Between the Takeuchi TB035 and Bobcat X331, the TB035 offers superior hydraulic control, lower hours, and structural durability, making it the better choice for long-term ownership. While Bobcat’s dealer network and price may appeal to budget-conscious buyers, the TB035’s build quality and operational finesse justify the investment. In compact excavation, reliability and control often outweigh initial savings.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Where Is The Oil Pressure Sender Connector On A Bobcat S175 MikePhua 0 53 11-28-2025, 02:13 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Offset Swing on Compact Excavators Is Useful but Risky When Overused MikePhua 0 83 11-16-2025, 07:28 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Coolant Service Strategy for the Bobcat S150 Skid Steer MikePhua 0 82 11-14-2025, 04:44 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Can You Bypass the Armrest Safety Switch on a Bobcat 430 MikePhua 0 78 11-14-2025, 03:02 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Is the Takeuchi TB035 Too Old to Be Useful MikePhua 0 65 11-12-2025, 07:38 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Fuel Consumption Insights for the CAT 279C Compact Track Loader MikePhua 0 73 11-12-2025, 07:14 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Bobcat T300 Auxiliary Hydraulics MikePhua 0 70 11-01-2025, 08:07 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Which Compact Machines Offer the Most Room for Larger Operators MikePhua 0 69 11-01-2025, 07:50 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Terex TC75 Compact Crawler Excavator MikePhua 0 65 11-01-2025, 07:03 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Cat 299D3 vs Deere 333G Which Compact Track Loader Performs Better MikePhua 0 86 11-01-2025, 06:59 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Exploring the Bobcat E80: A New Addition to the Fleet MikePhua 0 84 10-27-2025, 09:04 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Bobcat 442: Pros, Cons, and What to Look for When Buying MikePhua 0 81 10-27-2025, 05:49 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  John Deere D Series Skid Steers and Compact Track Loaders MikePhua 0 77 10-26-2025, 08:37 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  What Is a Bobcat T180 Worth After 75 Hours of Use MikePhua 0 84 10-24-2025, 07:58 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Why Are Compact Wheel Loaders More Popular Than Skid Steers in Europe MikePhua 0 64 10-23-2025, 05:58 PM
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)