7 hours ago
Brand History and Market Position
Kubota and Bobcat are two of the most recognized names in compact equipment. Kubota, founded in 1890 in Japan, has built a reputation for reliability and mechanical simplicity, especially in the agricultural and compact construction sectors. Its mini excavators are known for tight hydraulic tolerances, long service intervals, and intuitive controls.
Bobcat, originally part of Melroe Manufacturing and later acquired by Doosan, has focused heavily on innovation and attachment versatility. The E-series, including the E35, marked a shift toward zero tail swing (ZTS) designs and improved cab ergonomics. However, Bobcat’s earlier models were sometimes criticized for inconsistent quality control and vague specifications.
Core Specifications and Performance Comparison
The 2010 Kubota KX91 and Bobcat E35 are both 3.5-ton class mini excavators, but they differ in layout and hydraulic performance.
Kubota KX91:
Cab Comfort and Ergonomics
Operators with back issues or those working long hours often prioritize cab layout. The Kubota KX91 has a more open cab with straightforward controls, while the Bobcat E35 offers a more enclosed space with modern joystick configurations.
Pros of Kubota:
Attachment Versatility and Hydraulic Power
Bobcat’s E35 shines in attachment versatility. With higher auxiliary flow and integrated control systems, it supports a wider range of tools. This makes it ideal for users who plan to run post-hole augers, brush cutters, or tilt buckets.
Kubota’s lower flow limits some high-demand attachments but excels in precision tasks like trenching and grading. Its hydraulic system is known for smooth modulation and minimal drift.
Suggested upgrades:
Dealer support varies by region, but Kubota generally has a stronger presence in rural and agricultural areas. Bobcat’s network is more urban-focused and attachment-driven.
Reliability insights:
Pricing and Value Considerations
In 2010, both machines retailed around $36,000 for base models. With attachments like angle blade, thumb, and ripper, prices rose to $42,000–$44,000. Used units with 500–1,000 hours typically sell for:
Choosing between the Kubota KX91 and Bobcat E35 depends on priorities. For precision, reliability, and mechanical simplicity, the Kubota is a proven performer. For attachment versatility, cab refinement, and ZTS maneuverability, the Bobcat offers more features—though with slightly more complexity.
For property owners or light contractors, the Kubota may offer better long-term value and fewer surprises. For users planning to run multiple hydraulic tools or work in tight urban spaces, the Bobcat’s design and flow capacity may justify the investment. Either way, both machines represent solid choices in the compact excavator class.
Kubota and Bobcat are two of the most recognized names in compact equipment. Kubota, founded in 1890 in Japan, has built a reputation for reliability and mechanical simplicity, especially in the agricultural and compact construction sectors. Its mini excavators are known for tight hydraulic tolerances, long service intervals, and intuitive controls.
Bobcat, originally part of Melroe Manufacturing and later acquired by Doosan, has focused heavily on innovation and attachment versatility. The E-series, including the E35, marked a shift toward zero tail swing (ZTS) designs and improved cab ergonomics. However, Bobcat’s earlier models were sometimes criticized for inconsistent quality control and vague specifications.
Core Specifications and Performance Comparison
The 2010 Kubota KX91 and Bobcat E35 are both 3.5-ton class mini excavators, but they differ in layout and hydraulic performance.
Kubota KX91:
- Operating weight: ~3,200 kg
- Engine: Kubota D1703, ~28 hp
- Dig depth: ~3.1 meters
- Auxiliary hydraulic flow: ~10.9 GPM
- Conventional tail swing
- Operating weight: ~3,500 kg
- Engine: Kubota V2403, ~33 hp
- Dig depth: ~3.2 meters
- Auxiliary hydraulic flow: ~16.9 GPM
- Zero tail swing
- Zero Tail Swing (ZTS): A design where the rear of the machine stays within the track width during rotation, reducing the risk of hitting nearby objects.
- Auxiliary Hydraulic Flow: The volume of hydraulic fluid available for attachments like thumbs, augers, or mowers.
- Dig Depth: Maximum vertical reach of the bucket below ground level.
Cab Comfort and Ergonomics
Operators with back issues or those working long hours often prioritize cab layout. The Kubota KX91 has a more open cab with straightforward controls, while the Bobcat E35 offers a more enclosed space with modern joystick configurations.
Pros of Kubota:
- Simple, intuitive control layout
- Easier access for maintenance
- Lower noise levels
- More refined cab insulation
- Better visibility in ZTS configuration
- Integrated attachment control systems
Attachment Versatility and Hydraulic Power
Bobcat’s E35 shines in attachment versatility. With higher auxiliary flow and integrated control systems, it supports a wider range of tools. This makes it ideal for users who plan to run post-hole augers, brush cutters, or tilt buckets.
Kubota’s lower flow limits some high-demand attachments but excels in precision tasks like trenching and grading. Its hydraulic system is known for smooth modulation and minimal drift.
Suggested upgrades:
- Bobcat: Add a hydraulic quick coupler and thumb for maximum flexibility
- Kubota: Install a manual coupler and angle blade for grading efficiency
Dealer support varies by region, but Kubota generally has a stronger presence in rural and agricultural areas. Bobcat’s network is more urban-focused and attachment-driven.
Reliability insights:
- Kubota machines often exceed 5,000 hours with minimal issues if maintained properly
- Bobcat’s E-series improved over previous models, but early units may show wear in electrical systems and bushings
Pricing and Value Considerations
In 2010, both machines retailed around $36,000 for base models. With attachments like angle blade, thumb, and ripper, prices rose to $42,000–$44,000. Used units with 500–1,000 hours typically sell for:
- Kubota KX91: $22,000–$28,000
- Bobcat E35: $24,000–$30,000
- Warranty coverage (Kubota often offers 2–3 years)
- Dealer proximity and parts availability
- Attachment compatibility and resale demand
Choosing between the Kubota KX91 and Bobcat E35 depends on priorities. For precision, reliability, and mechanical simplicity, the Kubota is a proven performer. For attachment versatility, cab refinement, and ZTS maneuverability, the Bobcat offers more features—though with slightly more complexity.
For property owners or light contractors, the Kubota may offer better long-term value and fewer surprises. For users planning to run multiple hydraulic tools or work in tight urban spaces, the Bobcat’s design and flow capacity may justify the investment. Either way, both machines represent solid choices in the compact excavator class.
