Yesterday, 04:23 PM
Why Viscosity Matters in Hydraulic Systems
Hydraulic fluid serves as the lifeblood of any hydraulic system, transmitting power, lubricating components, and dissipating heat. The ISO viscosity grade—such as ISO 46 or ISO 68—refers to the fluid’s kinematic viscosity measured in centistokes (cSt) at 40°C. ISO 46 has a viscosity of approximately 46 cSt, while ISO 68 measures around 68 cSt. This difference directly affects flow characteristics, lubrication performance, and temperature behavior.
Viscosity impacts how easily fluid moves through valves, pumps, and actuators. Lower viscosity fluids like ISO 46 flow more freely, reducing energy loss and improving cold-start performance. Higher viscosity fluids like ISO 68 offer better film strength and wear protection under heavy loads and elevated temperatures.
Temperature Sensitivity and Seasonal Performance
ISO 46 is better suited for colder climates or machinery that operates in low ambient temperatures. Its lower pour point allows it to remain fluid during winter starts, preventing sluggish operation and cavitation. ISO 68, on the other hand, performs better in hot environments, resisting thinning and maintaining lubrication integrity under thermal stress.
Recommendations based on climate:
Load and Speed Considerations
Equipment operating under high loads, such as bulldozers, compactors, or large excavators, benefits from ISO 68 due to its thicker film and resistance to shear. Conversely, machines with high-speed hydraulic cycles—like skid steers or agricultural sprayers—often perform better with ISO 46, which reduces drag and improves actuator response.
Typical pairings:
Manufacturer Specifications and System Design
Always consult the equipment manufacturer’s hydraulic fluid recommendation. Pump tolerances, valve clearances, and seal materials are engineered for specific viscosity ranges. Using the wrong grade may void warranties or cause premature wear.
Factors to verify:
Contamination and Fluid Longevity
Both ISO 46 and ISO 68 fluids must meet cleanliness standards such as ISO 4406. Contaminants like water, metal particles, and sludge degrade fluid performance regardless of viscosity. Regular sampling and filtration are essential.
Maintenance tips:
Field Stories and Practical Adaptations
In Alaska, a contractor used ISO 68 in a hydraulic breaker during summer. When temperatures dropped below –10°C, the breaker stalled. Switching to ISO 46 restored function, but required more frequent top-offs due to thinner viscosity.
In Germany, a municipal fleet standardized on ISO 46 for all light-duty equipment. For heavier machines, they used ISO 68 during summer and switched to ISO 46 in winter, reducing downtime and improving cold-start reliability.
Conclusion
Choosing between ISO 46 and ISO 68 hydraulic fluid depends on climate, load, speed, and manufacturer specifications. ISO 46 offers better flow in cold conditions and high-speed systems, while ISO 68 provides superior protection under heat and heavy loads. With proper filtration and monitoring, either grade can deliver reliable performance. In hydraulic systems, viscosity is not just a number—it’s a strategy.
Hydraulic fluid serves as the lifeblood of any hydraulic system, transmitting power, lubricating components, and dissipating heat. The ISO viscosity grade—such as ISO 46 or ISO 68—refers to the fluid’s kinematic viscosity measured in centistokes (cSt) at 40°C. ISO 46 has a viscosity of approximately 46 cSt, while ISO 68 measures around 68 cSt. This difference directly affects flow characteristics, lubrication performance, and temperature behavior.
Viscosity impacts how easily fluid moves through valves, pumps, and actuators. Lower viscosity fluids like ISO 46 flow more freely, reducing energy loss and improving cold-start performance. Higher viscosity fluids like ISO 68 offer better film strength and wear protection under heavy loads and elevated temperatures.
Temperature Sensitivity and Seasonal Performance
ISO 46 is better suited for colder climates or machinery that operates in low ambient temperatures. Its lower pour point allows it to remain fluid during winter starts, preventing sluggish operation and cavitation. ISO 68, on the other hand, performs better in hot environments, resisting thinning and maintaining lubrication integrity under thermal stress.
Recommendations based on climate:
- Cold or variable climates: ISO 46
- Hot or tropical climates: ISO 68
- Indoor or temperature-controlled environments: Either, based on load and speed
Load and Speed Considerations
Equipment operating under high loads, such as bulldozers, compactors, or large excavators, benefits from ISO 68 due to its thicker film and resistance to shear. Conversely, machines with high-speed hydraulic cycles—like skid steers or agricultural sprayers—often perform better with ISO 46, which reduces drag and improves actuator response.
Typical pairings:
- ISO 46: High-speed, low-load systems
- ISO 68: Low-speed, high-load systems
Manufacturer Specifications and System Design
Always consult the equipment manufacturer’s hydraulic fluid recommendation. Pump tolerances, valve clearances, and seal materials are engineered for specific viscosity ranges. Using the wrong grade may void warranties or cause premature wear.
Factors to verify:
- OEM viscosity range
- Pump type (gear, vane, piston)
- Operating pressure
- Filter micron rating
- Seal compatibility
Contamination and Fluid Longevity
Both ISO 46 and ISO 68 fluids must meet cleanliness standards such as ISO 4406. Contaminants like water, metal particles, and sludge degrade fluid performance regardless of viscosity. Regular sampling and filtration are essential.
Maintenance tips:
- Use dedicated transfer pumps to avoid cross-contamination
- Install high-efficiency return filters
- Monitor fluid condition with particle counters and TAN (Total Acid Number) tests
- Replace fluid based on hours, not just calendar age
Field Stories and Practical Adaptations
In Alaska, a contractor used ISO 68 in a hydraulic breaker during summer. When temperatures dropped below –10°C, the breaker stalled. Switching to ISO 46 restored function, but required more frequent top-offs due to thinner viscosity.
In Germany, a municipal fleet standardized on ISO 46 for all light-duty equipment. For heavier machines, they used ISO 68 during summer and switched to ISO 46 in winter, reducing downtime and improving cold-start reliability.
Conclusion
Choosing between ISO 46 and ISO 68 hydraulic fluid depends on climate, load, speed, and manufacturer specifications. ISO 46 offers better flow in cold conditions and high-speed systems, while ISO 68 provides superior protection under heat and heavy loads. With proper filtration and monitoring, either grade can deliver reliable performance. In hydraulic systems, viscosity is not just a number—it’s a strategy.
