Choosing the Right Compact Track Loader: CAT 80 vs. Other Models

[MikePhua]

Compact track loaders (CTLs) are a powerful and versatile piece of machinery used in construction, landscaping, and agriculture. They offer superior traction and flotation in soft or uneven terrain compared to wheeled skid-steer loaders. The CAT 80 is one of the more popular models in the industry, but when considering purchasing a CTL, it’s important to compare it with other models to find the best fit for specific tasks. In this article, we’ll compare the CAT 80 with its competitors, delve into the factors that matter when choosing a CTL, and offer guidance on how to make an informed decision.
What is a Compact Track Loader?
A compact track loader (CTL) is a type of skid-steer loader equipped with tracks instead of wheels. This design allows CTLs to work in soft or muddy environments, where traditional wheeled loaders might struggle. The track design offers greater flotation, making it ideal for applications like landscaping, excavation, and snow removal. CTLs are especially useful on job sites with soft ground, as they minimize ground disturbance while still delivering the same powerful performance as wheeled models.
Overview of the CAT 80 Compact Track Loader
The CAT 80 is part of Caterpillar's mid-sized CTL range and is known for its rugged build, smooth operation, and versatility. It has a rated operating capacity of approximately 2,600 pounds, with a vertical lift design. The CAT 80 is equipped with a high-performance hydraulics system that powers attachments and allows for improved lifting and digging performance.
Key features of the CAT 80:

• Engine Power: The CAT 80 features a 74.3 horsepower engine, which provides ample power for lifting heavy materials and handling demanding attachments.
  
• Lift Capacity: With a rated operating capacity of 2,600 pounds, the CAT 80 can lift a range of materials and handle heavier loads compared to smaller models.
  
• Hydraulic System: The CAT 80 boasts high-flow hydraulics, making it suitable for a wide range of attachments, including augers, trenchers, and snow blowers.
  
• Operator Comfort: The operator’s cab is designed for ease of use, with ergonomic controls, a suspension seat, and excellent visibility.
  

The CAT 80 is suitable for a variety of applications, from earthmoving and grading to lifting and placing materials.
Comparing CAT 80 to Other Compact Track Loaders
When deciding whether the CAT 80 is the best choice, it’s important to compare it with other models from different manufacturers. Let’s take a look at how it stacks up against some of its competitors in the CTL market.
1. Kubota SVL95-2S
Kubota’s SVL95-2S is another strong contender in the compact track loader market, known for its smooth operation and excellent hydraulic power.

• Engine Power: The Kubota SVL95-2S features a 96.4 horsepower engine, providing more power than the CAT 80, which may be an advantage for tasks that require extra muscle, such as heavy lifting or digging in tougher materials.
  
• Lift Capacity: With a rated operating capacity of 3,000 pounds, the SVL95-2S offers a higher lift capacity than the CAT 80, making it better suited for larger-scale jobs.
  
• Hydraulic Flow: The Kubota also has a high-flow hydraulic system, ensuring versatility with various attachments, and it comes with additional options for specialized attachments.
  
• Operator Comfort: Like the CAT 80, the SVL95-2S offers a well-appointed operator’s cab, but with a slightly more compact and lower profile, which may appeal to operators working in tighter spaces.
  

For those needing extra horsepower and a higher lift capacity, the Kubota SVL95-2S offers a viable alternative to the CAT 80. However, it might not offer the same overall handling precision in smaller areas, where the CAT 80 excels.
2. Bobcat T750
Bobcat’s T750 is another solid option in the compact track loader category, often compared to the CAT 80 due to its similar size and performance.

• Engine Power: The Bobcat T750 features a 74.3 horsepower engine, which matches the CAT 80 in terms of raw power. However, the T750 offers a turbocharged engine for better fuel efficiency and performance.
  
• Lift Capacity: With a rated operating capacity of 2,600 pounds, the T750 matches the CAT 80 in lift capacity. Both machines are similarly capable in terms of lifting and material handling.
  
• Hydraulic Flow: The T750 has high-flow hydraulics, providing compatibility with a variety of attachments, much like the CAT 80.
  
• Operator Comfort: The T750 features a spacious, ergonomically designed cab with a focus on visibility and ease of operation.
  

Bobcat’s T750 stands as a direct competitor to the CAT 80, offering similar capabilities but with some operational advantages, such as its enhanced fuel efficiency. However, some users may prefer the CAT 80’s handling in rough terrains and its slightly more rugged build.
3. CASE TR270
CASE’s TR270 is another competitor to consider, offering strong performance with a slightly different approach to the CTL market.

• Engine Power: The CASE TR270 features a 74.3 horsepower engine, placing it on par with the CAT 80 in terms of power.
  
• Lift Capacity: With a rated operating capacity of 2,700 pounds, the TR270 has a slightly higher lift capacity than the CAT 80, which may make it a better choice for operators who need to handle heavier loads.
  
• Hydraulic Flow: The TR270 offers a standard hydraulic flow with the option to increase flow for high-demand attachments.
  
• Operator Comfort: The CASE TR270’s cab is designed for comfort and functionality, with a high level of visibility and user-friendly controls.
  

The CASE TR270 is competitive with the CAT 80, especially with its higher lift capacity. However, it lacks some of the enhanced hydraulic flow options found in other models.
Choosing the Right Model for Your Needs
When it comes to choosing the right compact track loader, several factors should be considered:

1. Application: What tasks will the loader be used for? If you primarily need a machine for lifting and moving heavy materials, a higher lift capacity might be more important. However, if you’re working in tight spaces or on rough terrain, the CAT 80’s agility may be more beneficial.
   
2. Hydraulic Flow: High-flow hydraulics are essential for running demanding attachments like augers, mulchers, and trenchers. If you plan to use these types of attachments, ensure the loader you choose can support high-flow hydraulics.
   
3. Horsepower: While the CAT 80 offers 74.3 horsepower, models like the Kubota SVL95-2S offer more power, which could be beneficial for high-load operations. However, a more powerful engine often comes at a higher purchase price and operating cost.
   
4. Operator Comfort and Visibility: Operator comfort and visibility should never be overlooked, as they directly impact productivity. The CAT 80 offers a spacious and well-lit cab with good visibility, but other models like the Bobcat T750 may offer additional advantages in terms of ergonomics.
   
5. Price and Availability: The price of a CTL can vary significantly depending on the brand, features, and attachments included. The CAT 80 is known for its durability, but models like the CASE TR270 may offer a lower initial cost with similar capabilities.
   

Conclusion
Choosing the right compact track loader depends on your specific needs, job site conditions, and budget. While the CAT 80 remains a reliable and powerful choice for many operators, other models like the Kubota SVL95-2S and Bobcat T750 provide strong competition in terms of power, lift capacity, and attachment versatility. Ultimately, it’s essential to weigh the benefits of each machine and choose one that best fits your operational requirements.
By carefully considering factors such as lift capacity, horsepower, hydraulic flow, and operator comfort, you can ensure that the compact track loader you purchase will meet the demands of your business and improve your efficiency on the job.