Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is the CAT 980 V8 Loader Worth Owning or Avoiding
#1
The CAT 980 and Its Evolution Through Generations
The Caterpillar 980 series wheel loader has been a cornerstone of heavy material handling since its introduction in the 1960s. Designed for quarry work, aggregate loading, and large-scale earthmoving, the 980 has undergone multiple generational upgrades. The early models, including the 980B and 980C, were powered by naturally aspirated or turbocharged inline-six engines. However, in a brief and unusual chapter of CAT history, some units were fitted with V8 engines—specifically the CAT 3408, a massive diesel powerplant known for its torque and appetite for fuel.
The 980 V8 variant was never a mainstream production model but appeared in certain markets or as retrofit configurations. While the idea of a V8 in a loader sounds appealing from a raw power standpoint, it introduces a host of considerations that potential owners must weigh carefully.
Terminology Annotation
  • 3408 V8: A Caterpillar diesel engine with eight cylinders in a V configuration, displacing 18 liters and producing up to 450 hp in some applications.
  • Torque Converter: A fluid coupling that allows smooth power transfer from engine to transmission.
  • Articulated Frame: A central pivot design that allows the front and rear halves of the loader to steer independently.
  • Planetary Final Drive: A gear system that multiplies torque at the wheels while reducing stress on driveline components.
Pros of the V8-Powered 980
There’s no denying the brute force of a CAT 3408. In a loader chassis, it delivers exceptional breakout force and fast cycle times when matched with the right hydraulic system. For operations that prioritize power over finesse—such as ripping through dense stockpiles or loading oversized rock—the V8 can be an asset.
Advantages include:
  • High torque output at low RPM
  • Strong performance in steep grades or soft ground
  • Impressive acceleration and bucket fill rates
  • Distinctive engine sound and mechanical presence
In one limestone quarry in Montana, a V8-powered 980 was used to load 40-ton haul trucks with minimal delay. Operators praised its ability to climb out of deep pits without bogging down, even when fully loaded.
Cons and Reliability Concerns
Despite its muscle, the V8 configuration introduces complexity and cost. The 3408 engine is heavier, thirstier, and more expensive to maintain than its inline counterparts. Parts availability can be limited, especially for older units, and fuel consumption is significantly higher—often exceeding 12 gallons per hour under load.
Common issues include:
  • Cracked exhaust manifolds due to heat cycling
  • Oil leaks from valve covers and turbo seals
  • Starter motor failures from vibration and heat
  • Difficulty sourcing injectors and cylinder heads
  • Transmission mismatch if not properly geared for V8 torque
In one fleet in Alberta, a V8 980C was retired early due to repeated overheating and fuel system failures. The machine had been retrofitted from an inline-six, and the cooling system was never properly upgraded to match the engine’s thermal output.
Ownership Considerations and Inspection Tips
Before purchasing a V8-equipped 980, perform a thorough inspection:
  • Check engine serial number and verify it’s a factory install or professional retrofit
  • Inspect cooling system capacity and radiator condition
  • Test hydraulic response under load and monitor for cavitation
  • Review maintenance logs for injector, turbo, and head gasket history
  • Measure fuel consumption during typical work cycles
If the machine has been sitting, expect to replace belts, hoses, and possibly the starter. Compression testing and oil analysis are strongly recommended before committing.
Fuel Economy and Operating Cost Comparison
Compared to a standard 980 with a CAT 3306 or 3406 inline-six, the V8 variant may consume 20–30% more fuel per hour. Over a 2,000-hour work year, this can translate to an additional $10,000–$15,000 in fuel costs depending on local diesel prices.
Maintenance costs also rise:
  • V8 injector replacement: $2,000–$3,000
  • Turbo rebuild: $1,500–$2,500
  • Head gasket set: $800–$1,200
  • Starter motor: $600–$900
These figures assume parts are available. In some regions, sourcing components for the 3408 requires importing or custom machining.
Resale Value and Market Sentiment
The V8-powered 980 is a niche machine. Some buyers seek them out for specific applications, while others avoid them due to complexity. Resale value depends heavily on condition, documentation, and whether the engine is original or retrofitted.
In one auction in Texas, a V8 980C sold for $28,000—nearly 40% less than a comparable inline-six model in similar condition. The buyer planned to use it for short-term stockpile work and accepted the fuel penalty as part of the deal.
Final Thoughts
The CAT 980 V8 loader is a machine of extremes. It offers unmatched torque and presence but demands careful ownership and deep pockets. For operators who need raw power and understand the mechanical demands, it can be a valuable tool. For others, especially those seeking efficiency and long-term reliability, the inline-six variants may be a safer bet.
In heavy iron, power is seductive—but it must be matched with practicality. And when the V8 roars, it’s best to know what you’re getting into.
We sell 3 types:
1. Brand-new excavators.
2. Refurbished excavators for rental business, in bulk.
3. Excavators sold by original owners
https://www.facebook.com/ExcavatorSalesman
https://www.youtube.com/@ExcavatorSalesman
Whatsapp/Line: +66989793448 Wechat: waji8243
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Understanding and Optimizing the CAT 259D Compact Track Loader MikePhua 0 4 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Field Performance and Maintenance Realities of the CAT 297C Track Loader MikePhua 0 4 4 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Evaluating the 1990 Dresser Wheel Loader in Modern Operations MikePhua 0 4 4 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Reviving the Case 580C Backhoe Loader for Modern Utility MikePhua 0 6 4 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Case 580B CK Value: Understanding the Market for a Classic Backhoe Loader MikePhua 0 4 5 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  The 1982 Case 580D Backhoe Loader: A Legacy of Durability and Practicality MikePhua 0 4 5 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Understanding the Michigan 175 Straight Frame Loader MikePhua 0 4 5 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Volvo L150H Wheel Loader: An In-Depth Look at Performance and Features MikePhua 0 4 5 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Operating Auxiliary Hydraulics on the Caterpillar 247B Compact Track Loader MikePhua 0 4 5 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Best Large Frame Compact Track Loader MikePhua 0 4 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Identifying a John Deere Crawler Track Loader MikePhua 0 4 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  John Deere 655B Crawler Loader Field Performance and Mechanical Insights MikePhua 0 4 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Ford 555D Backhoe Loader: An In-Depth Overview MikePhua 0 4 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Kubota L48 Backhoe Loader Versatility and Maintenance Realities MikePhua 0 4 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 930K Wheel Loader Performance and Maintenance Insights MikePhua 0 4 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)