Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Choosing Between Allied 1370R and LaBounty MDP35 for Concrete Demolition
#1
The Role of Multi-Processors in Modern Demolition
In today’s demolition industry, versatility and speed are paramount. Multi-processors—attachments designed to crack, shear, and pulverize concrete and steel—have become essential tools for contractors working on bridges, industrial plants, and urban redevelopment. Two standout models in this category are the Allied 1370R and the LaBounty MDP35, each engineered for high-performance concrete processing but with distinct design philosophies.
Both attachments are compatible with mid-size excavators in the 35–50 ton class and are designed to reduce downtime by combining multiple jaw sets into a single frame. The Allied 1370R is known for its interchangeable cracker and pulverizer jaws, while the LaBounty MDP35 focuses on modularity and precision control.
Company Background and Design Philosophy
Allied Construction Products, based in Cleveland, Ohio, has been manufacturing hydraulic hammers and demolition tools since the 1940s. The 1370R is part of their Rammer series, developed in collaboration with Sandvik and designed for high-impact concrete cracking. Allied emphasizes simplicity, speed, and reduced maintenance in its processor lineup.
LaBounty, a division of Stanley Infrastructure, has been a leader in demolition attachments since the 1970s. The MDP series (Mobile Demolition Processor) was introduced to offer modular jaw systems with advanced hydraulic control. LaBounty’s focus is on precision, durability, and long-term lifecycle support.
Performance Comparison in Field Conditions
Operators who have used both models report that the Allied 1370R delivers faster cycle times and requires less frequent maintenance. Its jaw design allows for aggressive concrete cracking, making it ideal for primary demolition tasks. The unit’s simplicity also means fewer moving parts and reduced wear in high-dust environments.
Key performance highlights of the Allied 1370R:
  • Jaw opening: approx. 36–40 inches
  • Crushing force: over 200,000 lbs
  • Cycle time: under 5 seconds (depending on excavator hydraulics)
  • Weight: approx. 6,000–7,000 lbs
The LaBounty MDP35, while heavier and more expensive, offers superior control and jaw interchangeability. Its bolt-on jaw system allows operators to switch between concrete and steel processing without removing the entire attachment. This makes it ideal for mixed-material demolition sites.
Key performance highlights of the LaBounty MDP35:
  • Jaw opening: approx. 32–36 inches
  • Crushing force: up to 225,000 lbs
  • Modular jaw sets: cracker, shear, and concrete pulverizer
  • Weight: approx. 7,500–8,000 lbs
Maintenance and Wear Considerations
One of the most debated aspects of multi-processors is maintenance. The Allied 1370R, despite being a processor, is praised for its low maintenance demands. Its jaw sets are simpler, and the hydraulic system is less complex than LaBounty’s. Wear parts such as teeth and bushings are easily accessible and can be replaced with standard tools.
LaBounty’s MDP35, while more refined, requires more frequent inspection of hydraulic lines, jaw pins, and wear plates. Its modular design introduces more interfaces that must be torqued and monitored. However, LaBounty offers extensive support documentation and parts availability through Stanley’s global network.
Tips for reducing maintenance downtime:
  • Grease pivot points daily, especially in dusty environments
  • Inspect jaw teeth weekly and rotate or replace as needed
  • Monitor hydraulic pressure and flow to ensure optimal cycle speed
  • Use OEM wear parts to maintain warranty and performance
Cost and Value Over Time
The Allied 1370R typically retails for 15–20% less than the LaBounty MDP35, depending on dealer and region. While LaBounty’s upfront cost is higher, some contractors argue that its modularity and resale value justify the premium. Others prefer Allied’s simplicity and lower operating costs, especially in high-volume concrete jobs.
A demolition firm in New Jersey reported that their Allied 1370R outperformed a LaBounty MDP20R in speed and reliability, particularly in bridge deck removal. Conversely, a contractor in Indiana preferred LaBounty for its precision when working near utilities and embedded rebar.
Operator Experience and Control Feedback
Operators often cite control responsiveness as a deciding factor. The Allied 1370R is praised for its straightforward hydraulic setup, which responds well to standard excavator auxiliary circuits. Its jaw closure is aggressive, making it ideal for breaking thick concrete quickly.
LaBounty’s MDP35 offers finer control, especially when paired with excavators equipped with proportional joysticks. Its jaw movement is smoother, allowing for more precise placement and reduced collateral damage.
Recommendations for optimal control setup:
  • Use excavators with high-flow auxiliary circuits (minimum 60 GPM)
  • Install proportional control valves for smoother jaw actuation
  • Calibrate cycle timing based on material density and jaw type
Conclusion
Choosing between the Allied 1370R and the LaBounty MDP35 depends on jobsite demands, operator preference, and long-term strategy. Allied offers speed, simplicity, and lower maintenance—ideal for high-volume concrete demolition. LaBounty delivers modularity, precision, and brand-backed support—suited for complex, mixed-material projects.
Both tools are proven performers, and when matched with the right excavator and crew, either can become the centerpiece of a demolition fleet. The real decision lies not just in specs, but in how each attachment fits the rhythm and reality of the work ahead.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Choosing an Excavator with Auxiliary Hydraulics MikePhua 0 1 7 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Equipment for Pond Construction: Ag Tractor with Pan vs. Dozer MikePhua 0 1 8 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing Between JD724K CAT 962H and Volvo L120F for Concrete Plant Operations MikePhua 0 1 8 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing Between New or Used Equipment for Your First Year MikePhua 0 1 8 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Cat 318BL Excavator in Structural Demolition and Historical Site Work MikePhua 0 1 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Rock Hammer for Excavation and Demolition MikePhua 0 1 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Advice on Choosing an 8-Metric-Ton Excavator: Key Considerations MikePhua 0 1 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Trailer for Heavy Machinery Transport MikePhua 0 1 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing Between John Deere and IHI Mini Excavators MikePhua 0 1 11 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Landscape Loader for Finish Grading MikePhua 0 1 Yesterday, 03:26 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Considering a Skid Steer: A Comprehensive Guide to Choosing the Right Machine MikePhua 0 1 Yesterday, 01:33 AM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing the Right Compact Track Loader: Deere, Kubota, New Holland, Bobcat, CAT MikePhua 0 5 08-25-2025, 11:19 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Is the CAT 312 a Smart Investment for a Demolition Startup MikePhua 0 1 08-25-2025, 11:17 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing a Reliable Used Motor Grader for Rural Road Maintenance MikePhua 0 1 08-25-2025, 11:14 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing Between Case 650G and Caterpillar D3C Series III MikePhua 0 1 08-25-2025, 10:29 PM
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)