Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is the 1967 Cat D5 a Hybrid of D6B and D4 Components
#1
The Origins of the Caterpillar D5
The Caterpillar D5 was introduced in the mid-1960s as a mid-range crawler tractor designed to fill the gap between the lighter D4 and the heavier D6. Built during a period of rapid expansion in Caterpillar’s product line, the D5 was part of the company’s strategy to offer more specialized machines for contractors and land developers. Caterpillar Inc., founded in 1925, had by then become the dominant force in earthmoving equipment, with a reputation for durability and innovation.
The 1967 D5, particularly the Powershift variant, was powered by the naturally aspirated D333 diesel engine—a four-cylinder workhorse with a 4.5-inch bore and a reputation for torque-heavy performance. The Powershift transmission allowed for smoother operation and reduced operator fatigue, a major selling point at the time. Caterpillar’s production records suggest that thousands of D5 units were sold across North America, with many still in service today, especially in forestry and rural excavation.
Undercarriage Confusion and Component Crossover
One of the most intriguing aspects of the 1967 D5 is its apparent blend of components from other Caterpillar models. Owners and restorers have noted that the undercarriage shares similarities with the D6B, while the operator station resembles that of a D4. This has led to speculation about whether Caterpillar intentionally designed the D5 as a hybrid, or whether parts were swapped during its long service life.
Terminology:
  • Undercarriage: The assembly beneath the tractor that includes tracks, rollers, idlers, and sprockets.
  • Operator Station: The area where the operator controls the machine, including the seat, levers, and dashboard.
  • SALT Tracks: Sealed and Lubricated Track links designed to reduce wear and extend service life.
Measurements taken from surviving machines show a track pitch of 6.91 inches—distinct from the D6’s typical 6.75 or 8-inch pitch. This unique specification suggests that while some components may resemble those of the D6B, they are not directly interchangeable. The D5 also uses SALT links, with part numbers like 3P7153 and 3P7154 stamped near the pad bolts.
The Role of the 955 and Other Crossovers
Further complicating the picture is the fact that the D5 shares several undercarriage parts with the Caterpillar 955 track loader. Depending on the year, the 955 used similar pitch tracks and rollers, making it a potential donor machine for restorers. This kind of parts crossover was not uncommon in Caterpillar’s mid-century lineup, as it allowed the company to streamline manufacturing and reduce inventory complexity.
However, not all parts are compatible. For example, sprockets and idlers from the D6C may look similar but differ in wear profiles and mounting geometry. Restorers are advised to measure components carefully and consult original parts manuals before attempting swaps.
Field Story from Maine
A restorer in Oxford, Maine acquired a 1967 D5 with serial number 84H493 and began a meticulous teardown. The machine had been owned by a local excavation contractor who reportedly maintained it with care during its early years. However, after a decade of neglect, the dozer showed signs of wear—including cracked recoil springs and a buildup of debris under the belly pans.
The restorer discovered that the machine had an enclosed cab manufactured by Industrial Cab Co. of Massachusetts, a foot-operated hydraulic tilt for the 9.5-foot blade, and factory-installed electric start. Weighing approximately 26,000 pounds (20,000 for the tractor and 6,000 for the blade), the D5 was a formidable piece of iron. Yet, the undercarriage showed signs of improvisation, with mismatched components and a leaking final drive seal.
Technical Recommendations for Restoration
When restoring a vintage D5:
  • Measure track pitch precisely using calipers or a pitch gauge.
  • Inspect recoil springs for cracks and replace with OEM or remanufactured units.
  • Clean belly pans thoroughly to prevent fire hazards from accumulated debris.
  • Verify part numbers on track links and sprockets before ordering replacements.
  • Use grease-type track adjusters for easier maintenance compared to screw-type.
Suggested upgrades:
  • Install a modern oil pressure gauge to monitor engine health.
  • Replace crusted wiring and air cleaner components damaged by rodents.
  • Add protective plates behind the fuel tank to shield against debris impact.
Maintenance and Parts Strategy
Given the age of the machine, sourcing parts can be challenging. Many restorers recommend purchasing a donor dozer with compatible components and salvaging what’s needed. While this requires upfront investment, it often proves more economical than piecemeal sourcing.
Preventive maintenance tips:
  • Change engine oil every 100 hours or annually.
  • Inspect track tension monthly and adjust as needed.
  • Grease all fittings regularly, especially on blade tilt and recoil assemblies.
  • Store the machine indoors or under a tarp to prevent rust and rodent damage.
Conclusion
The 1967 Caterpillar D5 remains a fascinating example of mid-century engineering, blending components from multiple models in a way that reflects both design intent and field improvisation. Whether the undercarriage truly mirrors the D6B or the operator station borrows from the D4, the machine stands as a testament to Caterpillar’s modular approach and the ingenuity of its operators. For restorers and enthusiasts, the D5 offers a rewarding challenge—one that demands patience, precision, and a deep appreciation for the legacy of heavy iron.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Building a Low-Cost Semi Trailer from Salvaged Components MikePhua 0 24 10-01-2025, 03:56 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hybrid Earthmoving Machines and Custom-Built Concepts in Modern Construction MikePhua 0 27 10-01-2025, 01:29 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Rigging Grain Dryers and Bin Components with Hydraulic Cranes MikePhua 0 30 09-28-2025, 06:21 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar D7E Dozer Hybrid Drive and Field Performance MikePhua 0 29 09-28-2025, 12:51 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  CAT 336E H Hybrid Excavator: An Overview of Performance and Innovation MikePhua 0 26 09-25-2025, 01:42 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Maintaining a 1993 Hitachi EX60 with Nissan Engine Components MikePhua 0 27 09-24-2025, 02:24 AM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Engine Identification for the 1967 Caterpillar 950 Loader MikePhua 0 44 09-19-2025, 05:50 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  1967 Ford 4500 Tractor Deep-Dive MikePhua 0 43 09-17-2025, 09:06 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Terex Articulated Dump Trucks and the Value of Salvage Components MikePhua 0 57 09-14-2025, 01:21 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Understanding the 680E and its Components MikePhua 0 47 09-14-2025, 11:20 AM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hitachi LX150-2C and the Legacy of Hybrid Engineering MikePhua 0 48 09-12-2025, 09:21 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hybrid Loaders from the 1960s and Early 1970s: Pioneering Sustainable Construction Equipment MikePhua 0 36 09-11-2025, 11:22 AM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Tracked Drill Units and the Rise of Hybrid Utility Machines MikePhua 0 35 09-10-2025, 01:13 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Volvo FC24210C Hybrid Excavator and the Rise of Low-Radius Forestry Machines MikePhua 0 42 08-30-2025, 10:20 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Understanding Semi-Truck Weight: Components and Regulations MikePhua 0 40 08-29-2025, 07:04 PM
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)