3 hours ago
Introduction: A Price Gap That Raises Eyebrows
In the compact excavator market, Bobcat machines often appear significantly cheaper than comparable models from John Deere or Caterpillar—sometimes by as much as $10,000 for units of similar age, hours, and condition. This pricing disparity prompts questions about quality, brand reputation, and long-term value. While Bobcat is a respected name in compact equipment, its excavators occupy a different niche than the premium offerings of Deere and Cat.
Terminology Explained
- Mini Excavator: A compact machine typically under 6 tons, used for light excavation, landscaping, and utility work
- Midi Excavator: Slightly larger than a mini, usually in the 6–10 ton range, offering more reach and lifting capacity
- OEM Support: Manufacturer-provided parts, service, and technical assistance
- Residual Value: The estimated resale value of a machine after a period of use
Key Factors Behind the Price Difference
1. Brand Prestige and Market Positioning
A contractor in Kentucky compared 5–8 ton excavators across brands for a grading business. He found Bobcat units consistently cheaper, but noted that local support for Cat was superior—especially for parts and diagnostics. He ultimately chose a used Cat 305E2, citing smoother controls and better resale prospects, despite the higher upfront cost.
Technical Parameters and Comparisons
Bobcat mini and midi excavators are priced lower than Deere and Cat for a mix of reasons—brand perception, component choices, and market saturation. For budget-conscious buyers or those with light-duty needs, Bobcat offers solid performance at a lower cost. But for contractors seeking long-term durability, robust support, and high resale value, the premium paid for Deere or Cat may be a wise investment.
As one operator put it, “Bobcat gets the job done—but Cat makes it feel like a job well done.”
In the compact excavator market, Bobcat machines often appear significantly cheaper than comparable models from John Deere or Caterpillar—sometimes by as much as $10,000 for units of similar age, hours, and condition. This pricing disparity prompts questions about quality, brand reputation, and long-term value. While Bobcat is a respected name in compact equipment, its excavators occupy a different niche than the premium offerings of Deere and Cat.
Terminology Explained
- Mini Excavator: A compact machine typically under 6 tons, used for light excavation, landscaping, and utility work
- Midi Excavator: Slightly larger than a mini, usually in the 6–10 ton range, offering more reach and lifting capacity
- OEM Support: Manufacturer-provided parts, service, and technical assistance
- Residual Value: The estimated resale value of a machine after a period of use
Key Factors Behind the Price Difference
1. Brand Prestige and Market Positioning
- Caterpillar and Deere have long histories in heavy equipment and are perceived as premium brands. Their machines often command higher prices due to reputation, perceived durability, and resale value.
- Cat and Deere offer extensive dealer networks with strong parts availability and service support. Bobcat’s network is improving but traditionally focused more on skid steers and compact loaders.
- While Bobcat excavators are reliable, they may use lighter-duty components in certain models. Deere and Cat often build with heavier frames, more robust hydraulics, and advanced electronics.
- Premium brands tend to offer better cab ergonomics, smoother joystick controls, and more refined hydraulic systems. Bobcat machines may lack some of these refinements, especially in older models.
- Bobcat excavators are more common in rental fleets, which can flood the used market and depress prices. Cat and Deere units are often retained longer by owners, maintaining higher resale values.
A contractor in Kentucky compared 5–8 ton excavators across brands for a grading business. He found Bobcat units consistently cheaper, but noted that local support for Cat was superior—especially for parts and diagnostics. He ultimately chose a used Cat 305E2, citing smoother controls and better resale prospects, despite the higher upfront cost.
Technical Parameters and Comparisons
- Bobcat E50 (5-ton class)
- Engine: 49.8 hp
- Dig depth: ~12 ft
- Cab: Basic, optional heat/AC
- Price (used, 5–10 years old): ~$30,000–$40,000
- Engine: 49.8 hp
- Caterpillar 305E2 CR
- Engine: 44.1 hp
- Dig depth: ~11 ft 3 in
- Cab: Premium, standard heat/AC, LCD display
- Price (used, 5–10 years old): ~$40,000–$50,000
- Engine: 44.1 hp
- John Deere 50G
- Engine: 36 hp
- Dig depth: ~11 ft 7 in
- Cab: Mid-tier, good visibility
- Price (used, 5–10 years old): ~$38,000–$48,000
- Evaluate local dealer support before choosing a brand
- Consider long-term parts availability and service costs
- Test drive machines to compare hydraulic smoothness and cab comfort
- Factor in resale value when calculating total cost of ownership
- For light-duty or seasonal use, Bobcat may offer better value
- For daily commercial use, Deere or Cat may justify the premium
- Use third-party service providers to support Bobcat machines if dealer coverage is limited
- Maintain detailed service records to preserve resale value
- Retrofit comfort features (e.g., seat upgrades, cab insulation) if needed
- Monitor auction trends to identify undervalued premium-brand units
Bobcat mini and midi excavators are priced lower than Deere and Cat for a mix of reasons—brand perception, component choices, and market saturation. For budget-conscious buyers or those with light-duty needs, Bobcat offers solid performance at a lower cost. But for contractors seeking long-term durability, robust support, and high resale value, the premium paid for Deere or Cat may be a wise investment.
As one operator put it, “Bobcat gets the job done—but Cat makes it feel like a job well done.”
