Choosing the Right Compact Excavator: Case CX 36, Bobcat 435, or Yanmar Vio35

[MikePhua]

When it comes to selecting a compact excavator, several factors need to be considered: machine performance, reliability, cost of ownership, and versatility. This article explores three popular models—Case CX 36, Bobcat 435, and Yanmar Vio35—to help you decide which machine best suits your needs. We will examine the specifications, advantages, and potential downsides of each model, comparing them on key factors such as performance, operator comfort, maintenance requirements, and overall value for money.
1. Case CX 36: A Durable and Reliable Choice
The Case CX 36 is one of Case Construction’s offerings in the compact excavator category, known for its robustness and powerful performance despite its small size. This model is typically used for digging, grading, and lifting tasks in tight spaces.
Key Features:

• Operating Weight: 8,000 lbs (approximately)
  
• Engine Power: 30.5 hp
  
• Digging Depth: 10’ 8” (approximately)
  
• Bucket Force: 5,700 lbs
  

The CX 36 is designed for smooth performance in various terrains, offering high lifting capacity and reach despite its compact design. It has a comfortable cabin, enhanced by the fully adjustable seat, which ensures that the operator can work for extended periods without discomfort. One of the standout features is its excellent hydraulic power, which enables it to handle tough digging conditions with ease.
Advantages:

• Powerful Hydraulics: The Case CX 36 offers superior lifting and digging forces, making it ideal for tasks that require significant digging effort.
  
• Comfortable Operator Environment: The cabin is spacious with excellent visibility, reducing operator fatigue during long shifts.
  
• Excellent Maneuverability: Its compact size makes it suitable for tight workspaces, especially on residential construction or urban development projects.
  

Potential Drawbacks:

• Fuel Efficiency: While powerful, the engine of the Case CX 36 can be less fuel-efficient compared to some of its competitors, especially in high-demand tasks.
  
• Limited Speed: This model isn't as fast in travel speed as others in the same class, which can affect efficiency in some applications.
  

2. Bobcat 435: A Versatile and Agile Excavator
The Bobcat 435 is another strong contender in the compact excavator market, widely recognized for its versatility and excellent hydraulic power. It strikes a balance between performance, comfort, and ease of use.
Key Features:

• Operating Weight: 8,100 lbs
  
• Engine Power: 34.5 hp
  
• Digging Depth: 10’ 5”
  
• Bucket Force: 6,400 lbs
  

The Bobcat 435 is equipped with a reliable Kubota engine that offers good fuel efficiency while maintaining a high level of power. The machine’s hydraulics are well-suited for demanding tasks such as trenching, lifting, and grading. Additionally, its low ground pressure makes it ideal for working on delicate surfaces or in soft soils.
Advantages:

• Versatility: This model is often praised for its versatility. It can handle a variety of tasks with ease, from digging trenches to lifting heavy materials.
  
• Compact Design: Like the Case CX 36, the Bobcat 435 is designed to work in confined spaces, making it a great choice for urban or residential work.
  
• Durable Hydraulics: The hydraulic system is strong and responsive, providing precise control during operation.
  

Potential Drawbacks:

• Cabin Space: While comfortable, the cabin may feel a bit cramped compared to other machines in the same weight class.
  
• Lift Capacity: The lifting capacity of the Bobcat 435 is lower than that of some other compact excavators, which could be a limiting factor for certain heavy-duty tasks.
  

3. Yanmar Vio35: Superior Efficiency and Innovative Features
The Yanmar Vio35 offers a unique combination of features, including impressive fuel efficiency, superior lifting capability, and advanced technology, making it a favorite among those who prioritize operational costs and ease of maintenance.
Key Features:

• Operating Weight: 8,000 lbs
  
• Engine Power: 34 hp
  
• Digging Depth: 10’ 6”
  
• Bucket Force: 5,500 lbs
  

The Vio35 is equipped with Yanmar’s advanced hydraulic system and a fuel-efficient engine that allows for long operation hours on a single tank. Its design includes a zero-tail swing feature, which makes it perfect for working in tight spaces without sacrificing performance.
Advantages:

• Zero-Tail Swing: This feature allows the Vio35 to work effectively in confined spaces without the risk of hitting nearby objects. It’s a great choice for urban construction sites.
  
• Fuel Efficiency: The Yanmar Vio35 is known for its fuel-efficient engine, which can significantly reduce the cost of ownership over time.
  
• Advanced Hydraulics: The hydraulic system in this model offers excellent lifting and digging capacity for a machine of its size, making it suitable for demanding tasks.
  

Potential Drawbacks:

• Limited Reach: While the zero-tail swing design is a major advantage in tight spaces, it does slightly reduce the overall reach and depth compared to other models.
  
• Less Comfortable Cab: The cab is relatively smaller compared to competitors, which may impact comfort during long work hours.
  

Performance Comparison: Case CX 36, Bobcat 435, and Yanmar Vio35
Here’s a quick comparison of the three models based on key performance factors:

• Case CX 36:
  • Operating Weight: 8,000 lbs
    
  • Engine Power: 30.5 hp
    
  • Digging Depth: 10’ 8”
    
  • Bucket Force: 5,700 lbs
    
  • Fuel Efficiency: Moderate
    
  • Operator Comfort: Excellent
    
  • Lifting Capacity: Good
    
• Bobcat 435:
  • Operating Weight: 8,100 lbs
    
  • Engine Power: 34.5 hp
    
  • Digging Depth: 10’ 5”
    
  • Bucket Force: 6,400 lbs
    
  • Fuel Efficiency: Good
    
  • Operator Comfort: Good
    
  • Lifting Capacity: Moderate
    
• Yanmar Vio35:
  • Operating Weight: 8,000 lbs
    
  • Engine Power: 34 hp
    
  • Digging Depth: 10’ 6”
    
  • Bucket Force: 5,500 lbs
    
  • Fuel Efficiency: Excellent
    
  • Operator Comfort: Moderate
    
  • Lifting Capacity: Excellent
    

Conclusion: Which Compact Excavator Should You Choose?
Choosing between the Case CX 36, Bobcat 435, and Yanmar Vio35 depends on your specific needs:

• If you prioritize power and hydraulic force, the Bobcat 435 might be your best option, especially if you have varied tasks requiring strong lifting capabilities.
  
• For those working in tight spaces, the Yanmar Vio35 is an excellent choice due to its zero-tail swing and fuel efficiency.
  
• If you need a well-rounded machine that can handle a range of tasks with comfort, the Case CX 36 offers the best overall performance, especially in urban environments where space is limited.
  

Each of these models has its strengths and weaknesses, but all are reputable machines known for their reliability and performance in the compact excavator market. Your decision should take into account the specific tasks you'll be performing, as well as the importance of fuel efficiency, lifting capacity, and maneuverability.