Steel Tracks for CTL (Compact Track Loaders): Benefits, Drawbacks, and Considerations

[MikePhua]

Compact Track Loaders (CTLs) are indispensable pieces of equipment in many industries, from construction and landscaping to agriculture and forestry. Their versatility allows operators to work on a variety of terrains, and they are especially effective on soft or uneven ground where wheeled equipment may struggle. One of the key components influencing the performance of a CTL is its undercarriage system, which includes the tracks.
While rubber tracks are the standard choice for most CTLs, steel tracks are sometimes used in specific applications. Steel tracks offer distinct advantages in certain conditions but come with their own set of challenges. This article will explore the benefits and drawbacks of steel tracks for CTLs, as well as provide considerations for when they might be the best choice.
Understanding Steel Tracks in CTLs
Steel tracks are typically used in situations where durability and traction are critical, such as in harsh, abrasive, or rocky environments. Unlike rubber tracks, which are softer and more forgiving, steel tracks are made from durable, high-strength steel that can handle extreme conditions.
Steel tracks for CTLs are generally fitted with individual steel links that are connected by pins. These links are equipped with steel cleats or "pads" designed to improve traction, especially on hard surfaces like concrete, asphalt, or rocky terrain. The tracks are mounted on a series of sprockets and rollers, much like rubber tracks, but with a more rugged design meant to withstand abrasive surfaces.
Benefits of Steel Tracks for CTLs

1. Durability in Harsh Environments
   Steel tracks excel in tough environments, especially those with rocky, abrasive, or frozen ground. The hard steel can handle sharp objects, such as rocks and debris, without suffering damage or excessive wear. Rubber tracks, on the other hand, can be punctured or shredded by sharp objects or abrasive surfaces.
   Example: In mining or quarry operations, where heavy loads and rough conditions are the norm, steel tracks are more reliable and cost-effective in the long run. They reduce the need for frequent track replacements, which can be costly and time-consuming.
   
2. Enhanced Traction on Hard Surfaces
   Steel tracks provide better traction than rubber tracks, particularly on hard surfaces like asphalt, concrete, or rocky terrain. The design of steel tracks includes cleats or lugs that dig into the surface, providing superior grip. This makes steel tracks ideal for CTLs working in environments where extra traction is needed for pushing or pulling heavy loads.
   Story: A construction company working on a heavily paved urban site with various concrete obstacles found that using steel tracks on their CTL improved traction and prevented slippage during heavy excavation work. Despite the tough conditions, the steel tracks endured, and the machine's performance was optimized.
   
3. Longer Lifespan in Certain Conditions
   Steel tracks tend to last longer than rubber tracks when used in abrasive conditions. The material is resistant to wear and tear from rough surfaces, allowing steel tracks to maintain their performance for an extended period. This long lifespan can ultimately save businesses money on maintenance and track replacement.
   
4. Better Performance in Snow and Ice
   Steel tracks often perform better than rubber tracks in snowy or icy conditions. The cleats in steel tracks grip the surface more effectively, which reduces the chances of slipping on slippery surfaces. This makes steel tracks suitable for winter construction or forestry work where traction is essential for safety and productivity.
   

Drawbacks of Steel Tracks for CTLs
While steel tracks have several benefits, they are not without their downsides. It is important to consider the following limitations before deciding to use them on a CTL.

1. Increased Machine Weight
   Steel tracks are significantly heavier than rubber tracks. This added weight can reduce the CTL’s lifting capacity and maneuverability, particularly in soft soil or wet ground conditions where additional weight can cause the machine to sink.
   Consideration: For projects that involve delicate or lightweight operations, the additional weight of steel tracks might not be ideal. Operators should assess whether the added weight will affect the machine’s performance.
   
2. Damage to Surfaces
   While steel tracks offer excellent traction on hard surfaces, they can be damaging to paved or delicate surfaces like asphalt, concrete, or turf. The steel cleats can cause surface scratches, grooves, and other types of damage. In areas where surface integrity is critical, the use of steel tracks should be avoided.
   Example: A landscaping company working in residential areas opted for steel tracks on their CTL but found that it left deep grooves on driveways and lawns, leading to customer complaints. They quickly switched back to rubber tracks to avoid further damage.
   
3. Increased Maintenance Requirements
   Steel tracks generally require more maintenance than rubber tracks. The links, pads, and other components can become worn, and regular inspections are needed to ensure that they remain in good working order. Additionally, steel tracks can suffer from rust, especially when used in wet or humid environments, requiring additional care and preventive measures.
   Maintenance Tip: Regularly check the tracks for any signs of wear, rust, or loose links. Applying anti-corrosion coatings and cleaning the tracks after each use can help extend their life.
   
4. Noise and Vibration
   Steel tracks can be noisier than rubber tracks, especially on hard surfaces. The metal components produce a characteristic clanking sound as they move, which may be undesirable in environments where noise control is important, such as urban areas or noise-sensitive worksites.
   Story: A contractor working in a residential neighborhood found that the noise from steel tracks was causing disturbances to nearby residents. In response, they opted to use rubber tracks for most operations, switching to steel tracks only for jobs that required maximum durability.
   
5. Higher Initial Cost
   Steel tracks are often more expensive than rubber tracks, both in terms of the initial purchase price and the cost of maintenance. While they may last longer in certain conditions, the upfront cost and maintenance expenses could be a deterrent for some businesses.
   

When to Use Steel Tracks for CTLs
Steel tracks are best suited for specific conditions where their benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Here are some scenarios in which steel tracks may be the ideal choice:

1. Rough Terrain and Abrasive Surfaces: If your CTL is working in a rocky quarry, mine, or construction site with heavily paved or rough surfaces, steel tracks will provide the durability and traction needed to navigate these challenging environments.
   
2. Winter Conditions: In regions with harsh winter conditions, steel tracks can provide superior grip on icy and snowy ground, preventing slippage and improving safety and productivity.
   
3. Heavy Duty Applications: For operations that require heavy lifting or pushing on hard, abrasive surfaces, such as demolition or road construction, steel tracks are an excellent choice due to their increased durability and traction.
   

Conclusion
Steel tracks for CTLs provide a robust solution in specific conditions that require enhanced durability, traction, and performance. They are especially effective in harsh, rocky, or snowy environments where rubber tracks may struggle. However, they come with trade-offs, including higher weight, maintenance costs, noise, and potential damage to surfaces.
Ultimately, the decision to use steel tracks should be based on the type of work your CTL will be doing and the conditions of the job site. For projects involving rugged terrain, heavy-duty work, and winter conditions, steel tracks may offer a distinct advantage. However, for operations that involve working on delicate surfaces or require more maneuverability, rubber tracks may still be the better option.
Careful assessment of the work environment and the machine’s intended use will help you make the right choice for your CTL, ensuring optimal performance and cost-efficiency.