Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
In-Depth Review of the Case CX135 Excavator: Performance, Reliability, and Real-World Impressions
#1
Introduction to the Case CX135
The Case CX135 is a short-radius hydraulic excavator designed for tight job sites without compromising digging power and versatility. Belonging to the mid-size category, it is often chosen for urban utility work, road construction, demolition, and confined excavation tasks. With its compact tail swing and comfortable cab, the CX135 has garnered a following among owner-operators and small contractors. However, like any machine, it has strengths and weaknesses worth exploring in depth through real-world experience.
Compact Design with Full-Sized Capabilities
One of the key selling points of the Case CX135 is its zero or minimal tail swing design, which allows operators to work alongside buildings, retaining walls, or in crowded environments without risk of damaging nearby structures. Despite its compactness, the CX135 retains a respectable digging depth, lifting capacity, and overall reach.
The machine typically weighs around 31,000 pounds and offers approximately 95 horsepower, depending on configuration and engine model. This balance allows for agility without sacrificing the grunt required for moderate excavation and lifting duties.
Engine and Hydraulic System
The CX135 is powered by an Isuzu 4-cylinder diesel engine, known for its fuel efficiency and decent torque characteristics. Users often praise its ability to idle smoothly and deliver adequate power for most applications. However, a few operators note that it lacks the raw grunt of larger machines when handling oversized loads or ripping through tough clay.
Its hydraulic system is responsive and smooth, with joystick controls that feel natural to most operators. Some models feature adjustable flow control for auxiliary attachments, enhancing compatibility with a wide range of tools such as hydraulic thumbs, augers, and compactors.
Hydraulic quick couplers are frequently retrofitted for faster attachment changes, especially in applications like utility trenching where time is critical. While not standard, many contractors consider them essential.
Undercarriage and Structural Integrity
Operators report that the CX135’s undercarriage holds up well under general usage. The track system, consisting of rubber or steel tracks depending on model, offers good traction and low ground pressure, which is ideal for landscaping or soft terrain.
However, some caution that extended travel on rocky ground or pavement can accelerate wear on rollers and sprockets. As with any tracked equipment, periodic maintenance of track tension and undercarriage inspection is crucial.
The boom, arm, and bucket linkage are robust and rarely fail under normal use. Cracks or structural fatigue are uncommon unless the machine has been abused or heavily overloaded repeatedly.
Cab Comfort and Visibility
The cab of the CX135 is widely regarded as comfortable and functional. It includes ergonomic seating, air conditioning (on most models), and intuitive controls. Visibility from the cab is excellent, especially to the sides and rear, aided by the compact counterweight design.
Some operators appreciate the relatively quiet engine operation and low vibration levels inside the cab. This makes long days in the seat less fatiguing, especially for those in owner-operator roles who spend extended hours in the machine.
Maintenance and Access to Components
The CX135 features easy access to service points, including filters, hydraulic reservoirs, and the engine compartment. Side panels and rear doors are designed to swing wide for routine maintenance.
Some mechanics have pointed out that while most daily service tasks are straightforward, certain deep repairs—like hydraulic pump servicing—can be more time-consuming due to tight clearances, particularly on the short-radius body design. Planning ahead and having the right lifting equipment and tooling is advised.
Common wear items include:
  • Hydraulic hoses (especially at the boom foot and stick pivot)
  • Pins and bushings at the bucket
  • Undercarriage components (rollers, sprockets, track chains)
  • Fuel filters and air filters (clog more quickly in dusty environments)
Known Issues and Troubleshooting
While generally considered reliable, the Case CX135 is not without quirks. A few operators report the following recurring issues:
  • Hydraulic drift: Slight unintended movement in the boom or arm when the machine is idling, often traced to internal valve wear or contamination in the hydraulic fluid.
  • Engine warning lights without codes: Occasionally, the check engine light may trigger without an obvious cause. In such cases, checking sensor connections or grounding wires near the ECU often resolves the issue.
  • Fuel system priming issues: After changing fuel filters or running the tank dry, the machine sometimes struggles to restart unless primed manually or given extra cranking time.
One story shared by a contractor highlighted a week-long downtime due to a faulty fuel injection control module. The part was backordered, causing frustration during peak construction season. As a result, he now keeps a few spare critical components in stock for all his excavators.
Fuel Economy and Productivity
The CX135 is known for its relatively low fuel consumption compared to larger excavators. This makes it especially attractive for smaller job sites or tasks that don’t require full-size machines. Owners estimate that it burns approximately 3 to 5 gallons per hour under load, depending on the attachment and duty cycle.
The ability to move from job to job on a tag trailer pulled by a heavy-duty pickup (in some jurisdictions) also adds to its economic appeal. This agility improves scheduling and reduces reliance on lowboy trucks or outside transport services.
Comparison with Similar Excavators
When comparing the Case CX135 with similar offerings from other manufacturers, a few patterns emerge:
  • John Deere 135G: Similar size and performance, but generally commands a higher resale value due to broader dealer support in some areas.
  • Komatsu PC138USLC: Known for extremely smooth hydraulics, though often considered more expensive to maintain.
  • Caterpillar 313F: Offers advanced telematics and creature comforts but comes with a higher initial price tag.
Ultimately, the Case CX135 holds its own in performance but often wins buyers over with its value proposition, reliability, and strong used market availability.
Parts Availability and Dealer Support
Dealer support varies by region, with some owners reporting excellent service and others citing delays in parts shipments or inconsistent technical support. Third-party parts suppliers help fill the gap for common components like filters, pins, and hoses.
Online parts diagrams and downloadable service manuals make self-service viable for those with mechanical know-how. As one operator said, “It’s not the fanciest, but it’s easy to wrench on.”
Real-World Owner Impressions
The majority of operators who use the CX135 describe it as a workhorse—dependable, maneuverable, and versatile. It excels in urban job sites, residential excavation, and light demolition. Some longtime owners keep their CX135s even after upgrading their fleet, citing low operating costs and ease of maintenance as key factors.
One retired contractor shared that his CX135 helped him complete nearly a dozen municipal projects in tight alleyways where full-size machines couldn't fit. He fondly recalled how the machine “paid for itself in the first season.”
Conclusion: A Trusted Performer in the Mid-Size Class
The Case CX135 has earned its reputation as a solid, well-rounded mid-size excavator. It may lack the high-tech frills or brute power of some newer models, but what it offers in reliability, ease of use, and practicality is hard to overlook. Whether for a small contractor seeking a do-it-all machine or a fleet operator looking to add versatility, the CX135 remains a sound investment.
Proper maintenance, a trained operator, and thoughtful deployment will keep this machine productive for years. And as one user aptly summarized, “The CX135 won’t win a drag race, but it’ll finish the marathon every time.”
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Volvo EC 700 B: A Comprehensive Overview of the Crawler Excavator MikePhua 0 1 2 minutes ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Increasing Road Speed on the Komatsu EX135W Wheeled Excavator MikePhua 0 1 3 minutes ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  CAT 308E CR V2: A Comprehensive Review and Insights MikePhua 0 5 43 minutes ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Case 580C: A Look at a Reliable Backhoe Loader MikePhua 0 3 46 minutes ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Operating a Case Bulldozer: Best Practices and Special Techniques MikePhua 0 3 46 minutes ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Understanding Hydraulic Pump Leaks in Heavy Equipment: The Case of the CAT 941 MikePhua 0 5 49 minutes ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Reviving a 1968 Case 580CK: Restoration and Maintenance Guide MikePhua 0 7 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  How to Remove the Starter from a Takeuchi TB016 Mini Excavator: A Step-by-Step Guide MikePhua 0 7 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Understanding the High Hours on a CAT 308E2 Excavator MikePhua 0 7 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Understanding Torque Converter Pressure in Case 1150 Tractors MikePhua 0 7 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  The World of Snow Plowing: Equipment, Techniques, and Best Practices MikePhua 0 7 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Mecalac 6MCR: An In-Depth Overview of the Compact Construction Machine MikePhua 0 5 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Removing the Wear Ring from a Case 580K: A Step-by-Step Guide MikePhua 0 4 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  The Fascinating World of Ducks: A Dive Into Their Role and Symbolism in Heavy Equipment Communities MikePhua 0 7 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Why Roll-Up Doors Are Not Common on Heavy Equipment: An In-Depth Analysis MikePhua 0 7 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)