Mid-Size Excavator Face-Off: John Deere 60P G, CAT 306, and Bobcat E60 in Real-World Applications

[MikePhua]

Introduction: Choosing the Right 6-Ton Class Excavator
When selecting a mid-size excavator in the 5.5 to 6.5 metric ton range, professionals are often drawn to three standout contenders: the John Deere 60P G, the CAT 306, and the Bobcat E60. Each machine represents the manufacturer's approach to balancing power, technology, comfort, and versatility. On the surface, these machines seem similar, but subtle differences in hydraulic performance, control responsiveness, cab ergonomics, and real-world durability can drastically shift long-term value. This article delves deep into how these three excavators compare in practical job site use, rather than just in spec sheets.
Machine Specs vs. Real-World Muscle
Manufacturers publish horsepower and dig depth to impress, but in actual trenching, grading, or demo work, the "feel" of the machine can trump numbers.

• John Deere 60P G: Known for smooth hydraulic performance and predictable controls. Though not the most powerful on paper, operators often praise its balanced breakout force and stability during lifting tasks. The boom and arm respond intuitively, with less "jerkiness" under load.
  
• CAT 306: The standout in this trio for raw lifting capacity and track power. Designed with CAT’s Next Gen technology, the 306 offers the highest auxiliary flow, making it ideal for running attachments like hydraulic thumbs, tilt buckets, or brush cutters. It's slightly larger and heavier, providing added stability—but that also means it might not fit everywhere the others can.
  
• Bobcat E60: Agile and quick, the E60 shines in responsiveness. Bobcat’s hydraulic system is tuned for rapid cycle times, which translates to productivity in repetitive motion work like trenching. However, some operators note it can feel "twitchy" at first, especially when fine control is needed around utilities or fragile structures.
  

A veteran operator in New England mentioned running all three on the same subdivision project. While the CAT impressed with lifting stone slabs, the Deere excelled in delicate finish work around curbs, and the Bobcat sped through trench digging at an unmatched pace.
Cab Comfort and Ergonomics
Spending 8–10 hours a day in an excavator cab makes comfort more than a luxury—it’s a productivity factor.

• John Deere 60P G: Offers a straightforward cab with analog controls and minimal distractions. The heater and ventilation system are reliable, though it lacks the touchscreen flashiness of the CAT. Visibility is strong thanks to large glass areas, and noise levels are moderate.
  
• CAT 306: Features a sealed, pressurized cab with air conditioning, touchscreen interface, and Bluetooth. Ergonomics are top-tier. Joystick travel is tight and responsive. However, the digital interface may intimidate older operators or those who prefer simple layouts.
  
• Bobcat E60: Bobcat has made major strides in cab refinement. The E60 includes automatic climate control, a premium heated seat, and good headroom. Controls are well placed, though the plastic finish feels lighter-duty compared to Deere or CAT. Sound dampening is surprisingly effective.
  

An operator in Ohio joked that the CAT 306 cab was “nicer than my pickup truck,” while the E60’s creature comforts made winter work much easier thanks to rapid cab heating.
Hydraulic Power and Attachment Handling
Excavators in this class often run multiple attachments, from hydraulic thumbs to grading blades and even mulchers.

• CAT 306: Dominates this category with its high-flow hydraulics and pre-plumbed auxiliary lines. It supports CAT’s Smart Attachments system, which auto-detects certain tools and adjusts control profiles accordingly.
  
• Bobcat E60: Offers strong auxiliary flow and quick coupler compatibility. While not as advanced as CAT’s tech, it handles hydraulic hammers and compact grapples well. The E60 also supports Bobcat’s unique clamp functionality for its proprietary buckets.
  
• John Deere 60P G: Lags slightly in hydraulic tech compared to the others. It can run thumbs and tilt buckets effectively but may struggle with continuous high-flow demands like brush cutters or augers unless aftermarket solutions are added.
  

A contractor clearing a wooded lot noted that the CAT ran a flail mower all day without heat buildup, while the Bobcat needed breaks to cool off, and the Deere was limited to lighter brush-cutting work.
Undercarriage and Stability
A strong undercarriage ensures stability during lifting or sloping work and affects long-term maintenance needs.

• CAT 306: With a wider stance and more robust track system, it feels planted when swinging heavy loads or working on uneven terrain. Its weight helps in trenching stability but increases ground pressure.
  
• John Deere 60P G: Balanced and agile. It climbs into tight areas with confidence and feels secure even when offset digging. The blade is powerful enough to backfill aggressively.
  
• Bobcat E60: Lightweight and maneuverable, though slightly more prone to “rocking” under quick boom movements. The track tension system is effective but may require more frequent checks under heavy use.
  

One example from a landscaping firm in Vermont noted that the CAT could lift full pallets of pavers without tipping forward, while the Bobcat needed counterweights to perform similar tasks.
Transport and Accessibility
Ease of transport and versatility in tight spaces are major factors for contractors moving machines between urban jobs.

• Bobcat E60: Easiest to tow. Its compact profile and lighter weight (just over 13,000 lbs) make it suitable for tandem trailers with smaller trucks. It’s favored for city work due to its swing radius and nimbleness.
  
• John Deere 60P G: Slightly heavier and wider than the E60 but still fits most mid-duty trailers. Its zero-tail swing configuration allows work in confined alleys or residential yards.
  
• CAT 306: Largest and heaviest of the group. Requires a Class A CDL truck in many regions due to its curb weight approaching 15,800 lbs. While it offers great capability, tight sites may limit its usefulness.
  

An urban utility crew in Chicago reported that while the CAT often stayed in one location for heavy lifting tasks, they moved the Bobcat two or three times per day for quick pipe patch jobs.
Reliability, Service, and Dealer Support
No matter how good a machine is, downtime and support define long-term ownership value.

• John Deere 60P G: Backed by a large dealer network in North America. Simple design means many mechanics can service it without needing proprietary diagnostics. Filters and routine parts are easy to obtain.
  
• CAT 306: CAT’s support network is vast and efficient, with 24/7 parts delivery and advanced telematics for remote diagnostics. However, repairs often require CAT-specific tools and software.
  
• Bobcat E60: Bobcat’s rapid rise in compact equipment also extends to support, but rural areas may have limited service coverage. Parts availability is improving but still trails Deere and CAT in some regions.
  

A Florida contractor recounted how CAT delivered a tech to the job site within three hours of a hydraulic issue, while a Bobcat part had to be shipped in from out-of-state, delaying work by two days.
Final Thoughts: Which Machine Is Best?
There is no one-size-fits-all winner. Each machine shines in different aspects:

• Choose the CAT 306 if you need raw power, hydraulic versatility, and high-tech comforts. It’s best for operators who regularly lift, run attachments, or want digital support tools.
  
• Go with the John Deere 60P G if you prefer a simple, balanced machine that’s reliable, intuitive, and dealer-supported. It’s the most forgiving for newer operators and has strong resale value.
  
• Opt for the Bobcat E60 if speed, transportability, and modern cab comfort are priorities. It’s especially effective in urban construction, landscaping, and fast-paced trenching operations.
  

Ultimately, the best excavator is the one that fits your specific work profile. Whether carving trenchlines in frozen soil, lifting culverts on a slope, or digging post holes on a subdivision site, how a machine performs when the rubber hits the dirt matters more than what any brochure says.