Evaluating the ASV 4500 and 4520: Which Compact Track Loader Reigns Supreme?

[MikePhua]

When it comes to compact track loaders, the ASV 4500 and 4520 models have carved out a solid reputation in the market. Known for their excellent performance, durability, and versatility, both models are highly regarded by those in construction, landscaping, and other heavy equipment industries. However, like all machinery, they have their differences, and choosing the right one often depends on the specific needs of the operator.
This article will explore the key differences between the ASV 4500 and 4520, dive into their advantages, and discuss what makes each model a strong contender in the compact track loader category.
Overview of the ASV 4500 and 4520
ASV (All Season Vehicles) has been producing compact track loaders for years, and their products are renowned for their superior track systems and strong performance in a variety of conditions. The 4500 and 4520 models are no exception, offering excellent traction and durability, especially in challenging terrains like mud, snow, and uneven ground.
The ASV 4500 and 4520 are powered by reliable engines and come equipped with high-flow hydraulics, making them suitable for a wide range of attachments, from augers to buckets and snowplows. While both models are designed to handle heavy workloads, they each have unique characteristics that cater to different operator preferences.
Key Differences Between the ASV 4500 and 4520
1. Engine Power and Performance

• ASV 4500: The ASV 4500 is powered by a 50.3 horsepower engine, which provides a balanced mix of power and fuel efficiency. This engine allows for smooth operation across various job sites, and it's particularly beneficial for those who need reliable performance without excessive fuel consumption.
  
• ASV 4520: The ASV 4520 takes things a step further with a more powerful 74 horsepower engine, giving it a noticeable edge in terms of lifting capabilities and overall performance. This increased horsepower makes the 4520 better suited for more demanding tasks, such as lifting heavier loads or handling larger attachments.
  

While both machines can handle a variety of attachments, the extra horsepower of the 4520 is a significant advantage for those who plan to tackle more substantial tasks or require more lifting power.
2. Operating Weight and Size

• ASV 4500: The 4500 model has a lighter operating weight of around 4,500 pounds, which gives it a slight edge when it comes to maneuverability in tighter spaces or on softer ground. Its compact size makes it ideal for small to medium-scale construction jobs, landscaping, and residential projects.
  
• ASV 4520: With an operating weight of about 5,200 pounds, the 4520 is larger and more robust. This extra weight, combined with the increased engine power, allows the 4520 to handle larger tasks, such as digging and lifting with more stability. The additional size may make it less agile in tight spaces but gives it better stability and durability for heavy-duty tasks.
  

For those operating in confined spaces, the 4500’s smaller footprint can be a significant advantage. However, for larger-scale tasks, the 4520's additional size and weight can provide the added strength and power needed to get the job done efficiently.
3. Hydraulic Flow and Lifting Capacity

• ASV 4500: The hydraulic system on the ASV 4500 delivers a respectable 17.5 gallons per minute (GPM) at 3,500 PSI. This provides the necessary power to run medium-duty attachments and perform most general tasks. The 4500's hydraulic lift capacity is around 1,700 pounds, making it suitable for lighter materials and standard equipment.
  
• ASV 4520: The 4520 features a more robust hydraulic system, offering 23.3 GPM at 3,500 PSI, which allows it to handle heavier-duty attachments with ease. With a hydraulic lift capacity of around 2,400 pounds, the 4520 is better suited for lifting heavier loads and tackling more demanding projects, such as digging, grading, and carrying large materials.
  

For users needing extra hydraulic power or the ability to lift heavier loads, the 4520 is the better choice. Its superior hydraulic capabilities make it a more versatile machine for heavy-duty tasks.
4. Track System and Stability
Both the ASV 4500 and 4520 are equipped with ASV’s signature rubber track system, which is designed to provide excellent traction and stability. This system is ideal for rough terrains, such as mud, snow, and uneven ground, and reduces ground pressure, allowing for better floatation and less soil disturbance.

• ASV 4500: The track system on the 4500 is slightly narrower, which enhances maneuverability in tight spaces. This feature makes it an excellent choice for operators working in areas where space is limited, such as landscaping or residential construction.
  
• ASV 4520: The 4520, with its wider tracks, offers enhanced stability, particularly when lifting heavy loads. The added width helps to distribute the machine's weight more evenly, reducing the risk of tipping when operating on uneven ground or with larger attachments.
  

The track systems on both models are built to withstand heavy use, and the difference in width between the two machines comes down to the specific requirements of the job site. The 4500’s narrower tracks offer more maneuverability, while the 4520’s wider tracks give superior stability for heavier tasks.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Model
ASV 4500:

• Advantages:
  • More maneuverable in tight spaces due to its compact size.
    
  • Lighter operating weight, making it more suitable for soft ground or residential jobs.
    
  • Lower initial cost compared to the 4520.
    
  • Efficient for medium-duty tasks and general applications.
    
• Disadvantages:
  • Lower lifting capacity and less hydraulic power compared to the 4520.
    
  • Not as well-suited for heavy-duty tasks or large attachments.
    
  • Limited in terms of engine power and ability to handle demanding projects.
    

ASV 4520:

• Advantages:
  • Increased engine power and hydraulic flow for heavy-duty tasks.
    
  • Higher lifting capacity and better suited for larger attachments.
    
  • More stable on uneven terrain and when carrying heavy loads.
    
  • Excellent for construction, landscaping, and other heavy-duty applications.
    
• Disadvantages:
  • Larger size and higher operating weight, which can make it less maneuverable in tight spaces.
    
  • Higher initial cost compared to the 4500.
    
  • May be overkill for smaller, residential jobs.
    

Conclusion: Which Model Is Right for You?
Choosing between the ASV 4500 and 4520 ultimately depends on the specific needs of the operator. The 4500 is a great choice for those who prioritize maneuverability, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness, especially for medium-duty tasks and residential projects. On the other hand, the ASV 4520 is a powerhouse, offering superior lifting capacity, more engine power, and increased hydraulic capabilities for heavier-duty tasks.
Both machines share the same durable track system and strong performance, but the 4520’s enhanced specifications make it the ideal choice for contractors or operators who frequently handle large materials, operate in more challenging conditions, or need more power for demanding tasks.
In the end, whether you're working on a tight job site or need to move large amounts of material, both the ASV 4500 and 4520 are excellent machines—each suited for different kinds of work. By understanding the strengths of each model, you can make an informed decision that best suits your needs.