Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Comparing the 2007 CASE 640 vs. 2017 CASE 650: Which is the Better Investment?
#1
Introduction: A Decade of Change in the CASE Skid Steer Lineup
When comparing two skid steer models from CASE—one from 2007 and the other from 2017—it's not just about numbers on paper. The CASE 640 from 2007 and the CASE 650 from 2017 represent two distinct eras in construction equipment, and understanding their differences is crucial for anyone looking to invest in a skid steer. With over a decade of technological advancements, engine improvements, and comfort features, the 650 brings a new set of features that may be beneficial to modern-day contractors and equipment owners. But does it truly outperform the older 640 model, or does the classic 640 still hold its own?
In this article, we'll break down the key differences between these two machines, discussing performance, maintenance, features, and overall value for money.
The CASE 640: A Workhorse of Its Time
Released in 2007, the CASE 640 was built to handle medium-duty tasks with strong lifting capacity and excellent hydraulic power. It has a reputation for being a reliable machine in a variety of industries, including construction, landscaping, and agriculture.
  1. Engine Performance and Power
    The 2007 CASE 640 is powered by a solid, durable engine that provides sufficient horsepower for most mid-range tasks. With a typical engine size of 74 horsepower, it provides the necessary power for lifting and carrying heavy loads, making it a dependable workhorse for many construction sites.
  2. Hydraulic System and Lift Capacity
    One of the standout features of the CASE 640 is its hydraulic system, capable of delivering strong lifting force and attachment performance. The machine's rated operating capacity is approximately 1,850 pounds, which allows it to handle a variety of tools and attachments, including augers, forks, and snow plows. The hydraulic system is known for its smooth performance and efficient power transfer.
  3. Operator Comfort and Ease of Use
    Although the 640's design was considered modern for its time, it lacks the advanced ergonomic features that are standard in newer models. The cabin is relatively simple, with basic controls and a standard seat design. The ride is functional but lacks the comfort enhancements seen in later models.
  4. Durability and Reliability
    Built to last, the CASE 640 has a reputation for being a durable and low-maintenance skid steer, assuming it is serviced regularly. However, like many machines from that era, it can experience wear on its undercarriage and hydraulic components after years of use, which may require repairs as the machine ages.
The CASE 650: Modern Updates and Enhanced Performance
Fast forward to 2017, and the CASE 650 brings a host of improvements over the 640 model, with upgraded features that address power, comfort, efficiency, and performance.
  1. Engine Performance and Power
    The 2017 CASE 650 boasts a more powerful engine, typically rated at 74.3 horsepower, with improved fuel efficiency and emission standards. The machine is equipped with a more advanced engine, designed to meet the latest Tier 4 final emissions regulations, which provides better fuel efficiency and lower emissions. This results in a cleaner operation, which can be a significant advantage on jobsites with stringent environmental regulations.
  2. Hydraulic System and Lift Capacity
    The hydraulic system in the CASE 650 has also been enhanced, with increased lift capacity and smoother operation. It features a rated operating capacity of 2,100 pounds, which is an improvement over the 640’s capacity, allowing it to handle heavier loads. Additionally, the 650 offers improved auxiliary hydraulics, providing better support for attachments like brooms, trenchers, and backhoes.
  3. Comfort and Operator Features
    One of the major upgrades in the 2017 CASE 650 is the cabin. With a fully redesigned operator space, the 650 offers more comfort and visibility. The controls are more intuitive and responsive, and the operator's seat has been upgraded with better cushioning and support. Additionally, the cabin includes enhanced climate control systems, reducing operator fatigue during long workdays.
    The machine also has a more modern display system with advanced diagnostics and feedback, allowing the operator to monitor the performance of the machine in real-time. This is a major shift from the simpler control systems in the 640, providing better insights into machine health and reducing downtime.
  4. Technology and Efficiency
    The 650 comes with several technology upgrades, including advanced engine management systems, improved fuel management, and reduced noise levels. These features contribute to better fuel efficiency and reduced environmental impact compared to the older 640. Additionally, the 650's improved cooling system and maintenance features help to reduce wear on the machine and lower operating costs.
Comparing Performance and Functionality
  1. Lifting and Operating Capacity
    In terms of lift capacity, the CASE 650 outperforms the 640 with a 2,100-pound rated capacity versus the 640’s 1,850-pound rating. This increase in lift capacity makes the 650 more versatile for larger tasks and for lifting heavier materials. However, the 640 is still more than capable of handling typical medium-duty work, and its lift capacity is sufficient for many contractors.
  2. Hydraulic Power and Attachments
    Both the CASE 640 and 650 offer excellent hydraulic power, but the 650 has a more refined system that is capable of handling heavier-duty attachments with more precision. If you plan to use a variety of attachments or need increased hydraulic performance, the 650 is a more capable choice.
  3. Fuel Efficiency and Emissions
    The CASE 650 benefits from newer engine technology, offering better fuel efficiency and reduced emissions. This not only lowers operating costs over time but also helps ensure that the machine adheres to modern environmental standards. On the other hand, the CASE 640, while still an efficient machine, is not as fuel-efficient as the 650 and may not meet the latest emission regulations.
  4. Operator Experience
    When it comes to operator comfort and ease of use, the CASE 650 has a clear advantage. The more spacious and modern cabin, coupled with upgraded controls and enhanced visibility, makes it easier for the operator to handle the machine for long hours. The 640, though functional, does not offer the same level of comfort or ergonomic design, which could impact long-term productivity on the jobsite.
Cost Considerations: Which One Offers the Best Value?
When it comes to purchasing a used or new machine, the cost difference between the 2007 CASE 640 and the 2017 CASE 650 is significant. The 650 comes with a higher price tag, but that cost is justified by the newer technology, better fuel efficiency, and increased lift capacity. The 640, on the other hand, may offer better value for money if you’re on a budget and don’t require the latest features or a high operating capacity.
For smaller contractors or businesses that don’t need to lift heavy loads regularly, the 640 may still serve its purpose well, offering reliable performance at a lower upfront cost. However, for those who require better performance, increased capacity, and modern features, the 650 is the superior option in terms of long-term investment.
Conclusion: Which Skid Steer Should You Choose?
Both the 2007 CASE 640 and the 2017 CASE 650 have their merits, and the decision between the two ultimately depends on your business’s needs and budget. The 640 is a reliable, cost-effective option for medium-duty tasks, while the 650 offers enhanced performance, operator comfort, and modern technology for those looking for higher capacity and efficiency.
For businesses that value long-term efficiency, fuel savings, and operator comfort, the CASE 650 is the better choice. However, if you are on a tighter budget or don’t need the latest technology, the CASE 640 remains a solid machine that can handle a variety of tasks effectively.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Case Excavators 966 and 988: Understanding Performance, Issues, and Maintenance MikePhua 0 12 7 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Backhoe vs. Excavator: Comparing Maintenance and Longevity MikePhua 0 25 7 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Finding a Used Swing Rower for Your Case 580 SE: A Guide to Sourcing & Considerations MikePhua 0 10 7 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Should I Buy a Case 1150G Dozer? Key Considerations Before the Purchase MikePhua 0 10 8 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Looking at Used Case and John Deere Dozers: A Buyer’s Guide MikePhua 0 12 8 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Repairing a Hole in the Transmission Case: A Step-by-Step Guide MikePhua 0 12 8 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Case Sumitomo Excavators: A Strong Foundation for Construction and Mining MikePhua 0 14 8 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Replacing Swing Tower Bushings in Heavy Equipment: The Case of the 590 Series 2 MikePhua 0 15 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Understanding the Role of HTO Additive in the Case 1845C: What You Need to Know MikePhua 0 13 9 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Maintaining the Brake Master Cylinder on the Case 580K MikePhua 0 13 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Buying Your First Backhoe: A Guide to the Case 580 MikePhua 0 16 10 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Oil Contamination Between Bevel Case and Transmission in the Case 1850K Tier 1 MikePhua 0 15 Yesterday, 04:42 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Case 488P 1990: A Comprehensive Review and Maintenance Guide MikePhua 0 15 Yesterday, 04:38 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Case 590SL Fuel Pump Issues: Diagnosis and Solutions MikePhua 0 16 Yesterday, 04:32 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Dealing with Burnt Equipment: A Case Study of the 2006 Cat 826H MikePhua 0 16 Yesterday, 04:16 PM
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)