Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Yanmar SV100 vs Kubota KX080 in the 8-Ton Excavator Class
#1
The Rise of Mid-Size Excavators in Urban Construction
The 8-ton excavator class has become a sweet spot for contractors working in urban environments, utility trenching, and small-scale demolition. Machines in this category offer enough power for serious digging while remaining compact enough for tight access. Among the most discussed models are the Yanmar SV100 and the Kubota KX080—two Japanese-engineered machines that have earned reputations for reliability, efficiency, and operator comfort.
Both brands have deep roots in compact equipment. Yanmar, founded in 1912, pioneered the first commercially viable diesel engine for agricultural use and later expanded into construction machinery. Kubota, established in 1890, has long dominated the compact tractor and utility equipment market, with its excavators gaining traction globally since the 1990s.
Engine and Emissions Technology
The Yanmar SV100 is powered by a Yanmar 4TNV98CT engine producing approximately 72 horsepower. It uses a common rail fuel injection system and meets Tier IV emissions standards through internal combustion optimization, without relying on a diesel particulate filter (DPF). This simplifies maintenance and reduces regeneration downtime.
The Kubota KX080-4S2 features a Kubota V3307-CR-TE4 engine delivering 64.4 horsepower. It incorporates a DPF, exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), and a common rail system to meet stringent emissions regulations. Kubota’s automatic regeneration system burns off soot periodically, though operators must monitor regeneration intervals and inhibit regeneration in flammable environments.
Comparison summary:
  • Yanmar SV100: No DPF, simpler emissions system, slightly more horsepower
  • Kubota KX080: DPF-equipped, cleaner combustion, slightly lower horsepower
Hydraulic System and Attachment Versatility
Both machines feature load-sensing hydraulic systems, allowing smooth multi-function operation and efficient power distribution. The SV100 uses a variable displacement pump with proportional control, while the KX080 offers dual auxiliary circuits with programmable flow rates via its digital panel.
Kubota’s proportional thumb switch and programmable oil flow settings make it ideal for operators using hydraulic thumbs, augers, or grapples. Yanmar’s system is more analog but equally responsive, with fewer electronic components to fail in harsh conditions.
Hydraulic highlights:
  • SV100: Simpler layout, reliable analog control, strong breakout force
  • KX080: Advanced digital flow control, dual AUX circuits, better for frequent attachment changes
Cab Comfort and Operator Interface
The SV100 offers a spacious cab with ergonomic joystick controls, adjustable seat, and good visibility. It includes ROPS/FOPS certification and optional air conditioning. Noise levels are moderate, and the layout favors mechanical simplicity.
The KX080-4S2 takes cab comfort further with a suspension seat, climate control, low noise insulation, and a digital display panel. Operators can monitor fuel consumption, hydraulic settings, and regeneration status from the screen. The cab is slightly more refined, with better sealing and visibility enhancements.
Operator experience:
  • SV100: Functional, durable, straightforward
  • KX080: Comfortable, tech-enhanced, user-friendly
Undercarriage and Stability
Both machines use steel tracks with rubber pad options. The SV100 has a slightly longer track base, improving stability during trenching and lifting. Its counterweight is well-balanced, reducing tail swing and improving lift capacity.
The KX080 features a floating track system that adapts to uneven terrain, enhancing traction and reducing wear. Its undercarriage is robust, with reinforced rollers and track guards.
Stability comparison:
  • SV100: Longer track base, excellent lift stability
  • KX080: Adaptive track system, better terrain conformity
Maintenance and Serviceability
Yanmar’s SV100 is praised for its straightforward maintenance. The engine compartment is accessible, filters are easy to reach, and the lack of a DPF reduces service complexity. Parts availability is solid, especially in North America and Europe.
Kubota’s KX080 requires more attention due to its emissions system. The DPF must be monitored, cleaned, or replaced periodically. However, Kubota’s dealer network is extensive, and parts are readily available. The digital panel aids diagnostics, reducing guesswork during service.
Maintenance notes:
  • SV100: Fewer electronics, easier field service
  • KX080: More diagnostics, more emissions-related upkeep
Real-World Operator Feedback
A contractor in British Columbia reported that his SV100 performed flawlessly during a six-month sewer upgrade project. The machine’s simplicity and fuel efficiency were standout features, especially in cold weather where regeneration issues can plague DPF-equipped units.
Meanwhile, a landscaping crew in New Jersey praised the KX080’s cab comfort and hydraulic precision during a multi-phase park renovation. The programmable flow settings allowed quick switching between a compactor and a thumb, saving time and reducing operator fatigue.
Final Considerations and Recommendations
Choosing between the Yanmar SV100 and Kubota KX080 depends on priorities:
  • For operators who value mechanical simplicity, minimal emissions maintenance, and strong lifting stability, the SV100 is a dependable choice.
  • For those who prioritize cab comfort, digital hydraulic control, and advanced emissions compliance, the KX080 offers a more refined experience.
Both machines are well-built, field-proven, and supported by strong dealer networks. The decision ultimately hinges on jobsite conditions, operator preferences, and long-term service strategy. In the 8-ton class, either model can be the backbone of a productive fleet.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Yanmar SV100 vs Kubota KX080 in the 8-Ton Excavator Class - by MikePhua - 3 hours ago

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Komatsu PC400LC-6 Excavator Field Performance and Maintenance Insights MikePhua 0 4 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  CAT 302.5 Mini Excavator Overview MikePhua 0 5 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Finding Peace in the Cab of an Excavator MikePhua 0 4 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu PC70 Excavator with Cummins Engine Faces Persistent Reliability Issues MikePhua 0 4 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Review of the CAT 324E Excavator: A Powerful, Reliable Machine MikePhua 0 4 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Inside the Kato Excavator Service Manual and Its Practical Value MikePhua 0 4 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  John Deere 200C LC Excavator and Its Hydraulic Control System MikePhua 0 4 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Comparing Traditional Excavator Tracks and Blade Runner Excavators in Real-World Grading MikePhua 0 4 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Kobelco SK350 Mark 8 Excavator Performance and Reliability in Demanding Conditions MikePhua 0 4 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Understanding the Auxiliary Hydraulic Flow Rate on the CAT 311B Excavator MikePhua 0 4 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Buying an 8-Ton Mini Excavator: Key Considerations and Tips MikePhua 0 4 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hitachi EX300 Excavator: An Overview of Performance, Features, and Maintenance MikePhua 0 4 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 315C Excavator and the Limits of Lift MikePhua 0 4 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Running a Hydraulic Pole Tamper on the Kubota SVL95-2s Compact Track Loader MikePhua 0 4 2 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  CAT 336E H Hybrid Excavator: An Overview of Performance and Innovation MikePhua 0 4 3 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)