Is a 160-Class Excavator Enough for Tree Clearing

[MikePhua]

The Role of Excavators in Forestry and Land Clearing
Excavators have become indispensable in modern tree removal and land clearing operations. Compared to dozers, which rely on brute force and blade leverage, excavators offer precision, reach, and hydraulic finesse. With the right attachments—especially a hydraulic thumb or grapple—they can uproot trees, strip stumps, and sort debris with minimal soil disturbance. But choosing the right size class is critical, especially when dealing with mature hardwoods or tap-rooted species.
The 160-class excavator, typically weighing between 16 and 18 metric tons, sits in the mid-range of the spectrum. Machines like the Hitachi ZX160, CAT 316, or Deere 160D offer dig depths around 20 feet and breakout forces near 25,000 lbf. While versatile, their mass and hydraulic output may limit efficiency when tackling large-diameter trees or dense root systems.
Terminology and Machine Classifications
- 160-Class Excavator: Refers to machines in the 16-ton range, often used for utility trenching, small-scale site prep, and light forestry.
- 200-Class Excavator: Typically 20–22 tons, offering greater reach, lift capacity, and hydraulic flow—ideal for heavy clearing and demolition.
- Thumb Attachment: A hydraulically actuated clamp that works with the bucket to grip logs, stumps, and debris.
- Tap Root: A deep, central root common in species like oak and hickory, requiring significant force to extract.
Performance Comparisons and Field Experience
Operators with experience in both 160 and 200-class machines report noticeable differences in productivity. While a 160 can remove trees up to 24 inches in diameter, it often requires more digging around the root ball and strategic positioning. A 200-class machine, by contrast, can push over larger trees directly, reducing cycle time and fuel consumption.
One contractor noted that his CAT 315 struggled with mature poplars, requiring extensive root cutting. After upgrading to a 321, he found the added weight and hydraulic power allowed for faster takedowns and less repositioning. Another operator fabricated a thumb for his Case 9020B using subsoiler shanks, improving grip strength and allowing him to rip stumps more effectively.
Site Size and Mobilization Considerations
For small parcels—under 5 acres—a 160-class machine may be sufficient, especially if paired with a dozer for cleanup. However, on larger tracts or commercial clearing jobs, the time savings of a 200-class excavator become significant. The ability to push, lift, and sort without excessive repositioning translates into lower labor costs and reduced wear.
Transport logistics also factor into the decision. A 160-class excavator can often be moved on a heavy tag trailer behind a dump truck, staying within legal width limits. Larger machines require lowboy trailers and may incur additional permitting or escort fees. One operator with a 35-ton lowboy noted that mobilization wasn’t a concern, allowing him to prioritize power over portability.
Alternative Techniques and Dozer Integration
Some land clearers prefer using modified dozers with tree spears—vertical blades or spikes mounted to the front frame. These tools allow the dozer to bite into the trunk higher up, leveraging lift and traction to uproot stubborn trees. While effective, this method lacks the precision of an excavator and may cause more soil disruption.
Rippers on the dozer can assist in breaking root systems before pushing, but not all machines are equipped. An older D7E without rippers may struggle with deep tap roots, making the excavator a necessary complement.
Recommendations for Tree Clearing Efficiency
To optimize tree removal operations:

• Use a 200-class excavator for trees over 20 inches in diameter or sites larger than 5 acres
  
• Equip the machine with a hydraulic thumb or grapple for better control
  
• Pair with a dozer for debris movement and grading
  
• Consider transport logistics and legal width limits when selecting machine size
  
• Inspect root systems and soil type before committing to equipment class
  

In wet conditions, even smaller machines can outperform expectations due to reduced root resistance. However, dry clay or rocky soils demand higher breakout force and weight.
Conclusion
A 160-class excavator can handle tree work, but it sits at the lower threshold of efficiency for serious clearing. For contractors seeking speed, reduced labor, and minimal repositioning, a 200-class machine offers better value—often at a similar purchase price. The right choice depends on site conditions, tree species, and transport capabilities. In forestry, size matters—but so does strategy.