Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Cat 312CL vs Komatsu PC130-7: A Comparative Review of Two Popular Excavators
#1
In the world of heavy equipment, the choice of an excavator can be a tough decision, particularly when considering two reputable brands like Caterpillar and Komatsu. Both companies have established themselves as leaders in the construction and mining sectors, offering a range of machinery designed to cater to diverse applications. In this article, we compare the Caterpillar 312CL and Komatsu PC130-7, two widely used mid-sized hydraulic excavators, to help understand their key differences and how they perform in the field.
Caterpillar 312CL: Built for Performance and Versatility
The Caterpillar 312CL is part of Caterpillar’s C-Series range of excavators, which are known for their impressive performance, fuel efficiency, and ease of operation. Launched in the early 2000s, the 312CL quickly became a popular choice for contractors seeking a reliable and efficient excavator for small to medium-sized tasks.
  • Engine Specifications:
    • Engine Model: Caterpillar 3054C
    • Rated Power: 72 kW (97 HP)
    • Engine Type: Inline 4-cylinder, turbocharged diesel
    • Displacement: 4.4 liters
    • Fuel Tank Capacity: 230 liters (60.8 gallons)
  • Hydraulic System:
    • Hydraulic Pump Flow: 180 L/min
    • Maximum Hydraulic Pressure: 350 bar
    • Maximum Digging Force: 53.6 kN
    • Swing Torque: 30.5 kN·m
  • Dimensions and Weight:
    • Operating Weight: 12,500 kg (27,558 lbs)
    • Maximum Digging Depth: 6.4 meters (21 feet)
    • Maximum Reach: 9.5 meters (31.2 feet)
    • Tail Swing Radius: 1,710 mm (67.3 inches)
The 312CL is renowned for its powerful hydraulics and smooth performance in a range of applications, from trenching to material handling. The excavator’s weight makes it an ideal candidate for construction projects requiring both power and maneuverability in confined spaces.
Komatsu PC130-7: A Workhorse for Heavy Duty Applications
Komatsu’s PC130-7 is another popular model in the medium-sized excavator category, particularly known for its durability and robustness in tough working conditions. Introduced in the late 1990s, the PC130-7 is built to handle demanding tasks in construction, demolition, and utility projects, offering excellent digging performance and fuel economy.
  • Engine Specifications:
    • Engine Model: Komatsu SAA4D95LE-5
    • Rated Power: 72.5 kW (97.2 HP)
    • Engine Type: 4-cylinder, turbocharged diesel
    • Displacement: 3.9 liters
    • Fuel Tank Capacity: 200 liters (52.8 gallons)
  • Hydraulic System:
    • Hydraulic Pump Flow: 189 L/min
    • Maximum Hydraulic Pressure: 250 bar
    • Maximum Digging Force: 53.5 kN
    • Swing Torque: 25.5 kN·m
  • Dimensions and Weight:
    • Operating Weight: 13,000 kg (28,660 lbs)
    • Maximum Digging Depth: 6.3 meters (20.7 feet)
    • Maximum Reach: 9.2 meters (30.2 feet)
    • Tail Swing Radius: 1,775 mm (69.9 inches)
The Komatsu PC130-7 is recognized for its efficient fuel consumption and exceptional stability. Its heavier weight and larger hydraulic capacity make it ideal for larger-scale operations, where superior digging forces are essential. Additionally, its fuel-efficient engine allows it to operate for longer periods with reduced operating costs.
Key Differences Between Cat 312CL and Komatsu PC130-7
When comparing these two machines, there are several factors to consider that set them apart. Let’s take a closer look at the significant differences and how each model excels in different areas:
  • Engine Power and Fuel Efficiency:
    • Both the Cat 312CL and the Komatsu PC130-7 offer similar engine outputs, each producing around 97 horsepower. However, the Caterpillar engine is slightly more fuel-efficient due to its advanced engine technology, making it ideal for applications where fuel costs are a significant concern. Komatsu’s PC130-7, with its slightly smaller engine, is also designed with fuel efficiency in mind but may require more maintenance in the long run.
  • Hydraulic System:
    • The Caterpillar 312CL has a higher hydraulic flow rate (180 L/min), which translates to better performance in applications like lifting and material handling. However, the Komatsu PC130-7 compensates with a higher maximum hydraulic pressure (350 bar), allowing it to work efficiently in applications requiring substantial digging power, such as foundation work and demolition.
  • Operating Weight and Size:
    • The Cat 312CL is lighter and more compact than the Komatsu PC130-7. Weighing in at 12,500 kg compared to the Komatsu’s 13,000 kg, the 312CL has an edge when it comes to working in tight spaces or on softer ground. The lower weight also helps reduce wear and tear on the tracks and undercarriage.
  • Swing Torque and Digging Force:
    • The 312CL has a slightly better swing torque (30.5 kN·m) compared to the PC130-7’s 25.5 kN·m. This allows the 312CL to offer more efficient maneuvering, particularly in tasks requiring frequent swinging and repositioning. On the other hand, the Komatsu’s digging force of 53.5 kN closely matches the Caterpillar’s 53.6 kN, indicating that both machines are highly effective at digging.
  • Durability and Maintenance:
    • Both machines are highly durable, but the Komatsu PC130-7 has a reputation for withstanding tougher working conditions over long periods. The Cat 312CL is also well-built, but its slightly lighter frame may require more frequent maintenance, especially in harsh operating environments.
Applications: Which One Is Best for Your Job?
  • Caterpillar 312CL:
    The Cat 312CL excels in urban construction, roadwork, and utility projects, where compact size and fuel efficiency are key factors. Its impressive maneuverability and excellent hydraulics make it perfect for tasks like trenching, lifting, and precision work in tight spaces.
  • Komatsu PC130-7:
    The PC130-7, with its larger operating weight and robust hydraulic performance, is suited for applications that require heavy-duty digging and material handling. It’s ideal for construction, demolition, and utility work, where the excavator will be working in more rugged conditions.
Conclusion: Which Excavator Should You Choose?
The decision between the Caterpillar 312CL and the Komatsu PC130-7 depends largely on the nature of your work. The Cat 312CL is a compact, fuel-efficient machine perfect for precision work in tighter spaces. Its impressive hydraulic performance and maneuverability make it ideal for utility work, road building, and smaller construction tasks.
On the other hand, the Komatsu PC130-7 offers superior durability and stability for more demanding tasks. It’s well-suited for larger-scale projects that require heavy-duty digging and lifting capabilities.
Ultimately, both excavators offer excellent value for their respective applications, and the choice between the two should be guided by your specific project requirements and operational needs. Both models continue to be highly regarded in the construction and earthmoving sectors, standing as testament to the enduring reliability and innovation of their respective brands.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Cat 312CL vs Komatsu PC130-7: A Comparative Review of Two Popular Excavators - by MikePhua - 08-16-2025, 01:18 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Grove MZ 66 DXT: A Comprehensive Review of a Reliable Mobile Crane MikePhua 0 4 5 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu D37-2 Dozer Performance Reliability and Field Adaptation MikePhua 0 4 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Comparison of Compact Excavators: Bobcat E85, John Deere 75-85G, Case, and CAT 307/308 MikePhua 0 5 6 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu D41E-3 Dozer Reliability Performance and Maintenance Insights MikePhua 0 4 7 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  2005 CAT 312CL Excavator Review and Performance Analysis MikePhua 0 4 7 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Bucketwheel Excavators: Key Insights and Challenges MikePhua 0 4 8 hours ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Finding Reliable Service Manuals for Komatsu CK30 Track Loader MikePhua 0 6 09-28-2025, 08:22 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Intermittent Fast Track Function on Komatsu PC160-7 MikePhua 0 7 09-28-2025, 08:15 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Champion 710A Grader: A Comprehensive Review MikePhua 0 6 09-28-2025, 08:07 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu PC50UU-1 Excavator and the Challenge of Gray Market Machines MikePhua 0 6 09-28-2025, 07:54 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu PC220LC-3: Overview and Common Maintenance Issues MikePhua 0 6 09-28-2025, 07:06 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu SK60 Mark 4: Overview and Key Features MikePhua 0 6 09-28-2025, 06:09 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu PC75UU-2 Mini Excavator MikePhua 0 6 09-28-2025, 04:52 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu PC210LC-6 Excavator Reliability and Field Maintenance Guide MikePhua 0 6 09-28-2025, 04:40 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu PC60-6 Excavator: Key Considerations and Advice MikePhua 0 7 09-28-2025, 04:36 PM
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)