Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Evaluating ASV Compact Track Loaders: Performance, Durability, and Field Insights
#1
ASV Machines: A Unique Approach to Compact Track Loaders
ASV (All Season Vehicles) has carved a niche in the compact track loader market by emphasizing low ground pressure, superior traction, and smooth ride quality. Their machines—like the RC50, PT30, and SR70—are often compared to Bobcat and Caterpillar models, especially in demolition, landscaping, and indoor material handling applications. But are they truly built to last, and how do they perform under heavy abuse?
Frame and Undercarriage Design
ASV’s undercarriage system is one of its most defining features. Unlike traditional rigid frames, ASV uses a suspended undercarriage with torsion axles and rubber track rollers. This design reduces vibration and improves traction on uneven terrain.
Key characteristics include:
  • 50/50 Weight Distribution
    ASV machines balance weight evenly between front and rear axles, enhancing pushing and pulling power. This differs from Caterpillar’s 60/40 or 70/30 split, which favors loading stability.
  • Soft Rubber Tracks
    ASV tracks are known for their “stickiness” on slick surfaces, outperforming harder compounds in mud and snow. However, they are more prone to cuts and wear in demolition environments.
  • Non-Hardened Pivot Bushings (on Some Models)
    Early RC30 and RC50 models lacked hardened steel bushings in pivot points, leading to premature wear and slop in the loader arms. Later models and most PT-series machines corrected this with bushed pivots.
Terminology Explained
  • Pivot Bushings: Sleeves that reduce friction between moving joints in the loader arms.
  • Undercarriage (UC): The assembly of tracks, rollers, idlers, and suspension components beneath the machine.
  • Ground Pressure: The force exerted by the machine per square inch of contact area—lower values reduce surface damage.
Performance in Demolition and Heavy Use
ASV machines excel in traction and climbing ability. Their track design and weight distribution allow them to scale stairs, maneuver through tight spaces, and push heavy loads with surprising efficiency.
However, in demolition settings, several challenges arise:
  • Track Longevity
    While ASV tracks can last 1,500–2,000 hours in general use, demolition sites with sharp debris and concrete slabs may reduce lifespan to under 1,000 hours.
  • Roller Wear
    Gravel and debris can wedge between rollers and tracks, causing rubber flaking and accelerated wear. Steel roller upgrades are available and recommended for harsh environments.
  • Maintenance Complexity
    Machines without hardened bushings require frequent inspections and potential retrofitting. Some owners have added aftermarket bushings to extend service intervals.
Field Anecdote: Moving a Vault in Finland
A demolition contractor in Finland used a Bobcat 763 and a Brokk 180 to move a 3-ton bank vault through three buildings. The ASV RC50 was considered for its climbing ability and traction, but concerns over bushing wear and lack of local dealer support led to choosing more familiar equipment. The contractor noted that ASV’s track tread design and weight balance would have made the job easier—if parts and service were more accessible.
Comparative Observations with Caterpillar and Bobcat
  • Caterpillar 247/277 Models
    These use ASV-style undercarriages but are heavier and more balanced for front loading. However, some CAT models reportedly use undersized UC components, leading to high track wear.
  • Bobcat T250
    Known for durability but less capable in climbing and traction compared to ASV. The RC50 has been observed to out-push the T250 in certain conditions due to better weight transfer and track grip.
Recommendations for Prospective Buyers
  1. Assess Local Dealer Support
    ASV machines require specialized parts and service. Lack of nearby support can lead to long downtimes.
  2. Inspect Bushing Design Before Purchase
    Confirm whether the model has hardened bushings or if retrofitting is needed.
  3. Upgrade Rollers for Demolition Use
    Steel rollers and reinforced idlers improve longevity in abrasive environments.
  4. Track Replacement Planning
    Budget for track replacement every 1,200–1,800 hours depending on usage.
  5. Consider Application Fit
    ASV excels in landscaping, snow removal, and indoor work. For demolition, reinforced models or alternative brands may offer better durability.
Additional Parameters to Monitor
  • Track width and tread pattern (affects flotation and grip)
  • Engine horsepower-to-weight ratio (ASV often leads in this metric)
  • Hydraulic flow rate (important for attachments like hammers or augers)
  • Frame articulation and suspension travel
Conclusion: ASV’s Niche Strengths and Cautionary Notes
ASV compact track loaders offer impressive traction, low ground pressure, and smooth ride quality. Their ability to climb, push, and maneuver in tight spaces makes them ideal for specialized tasks. However, early design choices—like non-hardened bushings—and limited dealer networks in some regions can pose challenges. For contractors who understand the machine’s strengths and limitations, ASV can be a powerful ally. But for those in high-abuse environments or remote areas, careful evaluation is essential before committing to the brand.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Evaluating ASV Compact Track Loaders: Performance, Durability, and Field Insights - by MikePhua - 5 hours ago

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Comprehensive Guide to Removing a Stuck Steering Cylinder Pin on Volvo L50C Wheel Loaders MikePhua 0 1 57 minutes ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Wheel Loaders vs. Telehandlers: A Comprehensive Comparison MikePhua 0 1 58 minutes ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Choosing Poly Half Fenders for the Ford F-550: Durability, Sourcing, and Practical Advice MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hitachi EX200-2 Excavator: Performance, Maintenance, and Troubleshooting MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Improving Cold-Weather Air Intake Performance: The Snow Rotary Ejector Pre-Cleaner Upgrade MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Challenges and Solutions for JCB 456 Wheel Loaders in Afghanistan MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Caterpillar 307C Midi Excavator: Design, Performance & Troubleshooting MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  The Caterpillar 3406 Engine: A Legacy of Power, Performance, and Precision MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  John Deere 333G Compact Track Loader: A Comprehensive Overview MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  How to Reinforce a Truck Frame: Practical Insights into Double Framing and Structural Repairs MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Case 70XT Hydrostatic Skid Steer Loader: Features, Performance, and Troubleshooting MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  JCB 426E Loading Shovel: Performance, Features, and Maintenance MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  The John Deere 410K TC: Performance, Features, and Insights MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  The Hitachi EX120-3 Excavator: Comprehensive Guide to Performance, Maintenance and Optimization MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua
  Alternating Track Pad Types on Excavators: Traction, Terrain, and Tactical Design MikePhua 0 1 1 hour ago
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: