Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Track Loader or Dozer for Dirt Work and Motocross Construction
#1
The Evolution of Earthmoving Machines
Track loaders and dozers have long been staples in the earthmoving world, each with distinct strengths shaped by decades of engineering refinement. The track loader traces its lineage to the Drott 4-in-1 bucket systems of the 1950s, which transformed crawler tractors into versatile loading machines. By the 1970s and 1980s, manufacturers like Caterpillar, Case, and International Harvester had developed dedicated track loaders such as the CAT 955 and Case 1155D, combining digging, grading, and loading capabilities into one compact platform.
Dozers, on the other hand, evolved from agricultural crawlers into specialized grading and pushing machines. The Caterpillar D6 series, first introduced in the 1940s, became a benchmark for mid-sized dozers. With the introduction of six-way PAT (Power Angle Tilt) blades and hydraulic rippers, dozers gained precision and power for shaping terrain, especially in road building and site preparation.
Sales data from the early 2000s showed that compact track loaders were outselling dozers nearly 3 to 1 in the rental and light construction markets, driven by their versatility and ease of transport. However, in heavy-duty applications like mining, forestry, and large-scale grading, dozers still dominated.
Choosing the Right Machine for Motocross Track Building
When constructing or maintaining a motocross track, the choice between a track loader and a dozer depends on terrain, material type, and the nature of the work. Motocross tracks often involve reshaping hard clay, moving rocky soil, and sculpting jumps and berms with precision.
A dozer excels at pushing bulk material over short distances. With a wide blade and high tractive effort, it can cut through compacted surfaces and shape long straights in a single pass. For example, a D6C weighing around 18 tons can push material efficiently across 100-yard stretches, making it ideal for rough grading and slope formation.
However, dozers struggle with loading tasks and lack the finesse of a bucket-equipped machine. Track loaders, especially those with 4-in-1 buckets and rear rippers, offer greater flexibility. They can dig, carry, spread, and back-drag material, making them suitable for fine grading, jump shaping, and clearing debris. A Case 1155D, weighing 27,000 pounds and powered by a Cummins 6-cylinder engine, is a prime example of a loader that balances power with versatility.
Transmission and Steering Considerations
The choice of transmission and steering system significantly affects operator fatigue and productivity.
  • Hydrostatic Transmission: Offers infinite speed control and automatic braking when in neutral. Ideal for precision work and tight maneuvering.
  • Powershift Transmission: Provides reliable gear-based control, suitable for medium-duty applications.
  • Direct Drive: Less common in modern machines due to higher operator workload and reduced efficiency.
Steering systems also matter:
  • Pedal Steer: Allows hands-free directional control, freeing the operator to manage bucket and blade functions simultaneously.
  • Lever Steer: Requires manual input for direction, increasing fatigue and reducing multitasking efficiency.
Operators with experience on pedal steer loaders often report significantly lower fatigue and better control, especially during repetitive tasks like loading or grading.
Bucket Configuration and Attachments
The 4-in-1 bucket is a game-changer for track loaders. It combines:
  • Standard bucket for digging and carrying
  • Dozer blade for pushing
  • Clamshell for grabbing and dumping
  • Leveling edge for back-dragging
Adding a spreader bar—typically 10 to 13 feet wide—can enhance grading precision, especially on flat surfaces like house pads or track straights.
Rippers mounted on the rear of the machine help break up compacted soil and rocky layers, improving bucket penetration and reducing wear.
Operator Insights and Anecdotes
One former motocross rider turned contractor shared his experience maintaining tracks in Finland. Initially using agricultural tractors and wheel loaders, he found they lacked the ability to cut braking bumps and shape jumps effectively. Switching to a D6C dozer with a six-way blade dramatically improved efficiency and fuel economy. He later added a Komatsu D41S track loader for material handling and reshaping, finding the combination ideal for both rough and fine work.
Another operator in Virginia opted for a Case 1155D with a 4-in-1 bucket and rippers, calling it “the perfect beast” for motocross construction. The machine’s weight and power allowed him to clear land, sculpt jumps, and maintain the track with minimal downtime.
Terminology Clarification
  • PAT Blade: Power Angle Tilt blade, allowing multi-directional movement for precise grading.
  • 4-in-1 Bucket: A bucket that opens and closes hydraulically, offering multiple functions.
  • Ripper: A claw-like attachment used to break up hard ground.
  • Spreader Bar: A wide leveling tool attached to the bucket for smoothing surfaces.
  • Hydrostatic Drive: A transmission system using fluid pressure for variable speed control.
Conclusion
For motocross track construction and general dirt work, the track loader emerges as the more versatile choice. Its ability to dig, carry, grade, and clear makes it a one-machine solution for most tasks. However, pairing it with a mid-sized dozer like the D6C can offer the best of both worlds—bulk pushing power and fine sculpting control.
Ultimately, the decision should be guided by terrain type, job scope, and operator preference. Machines with hydrostatic transmission, pedal steer, and 4-in-1 buckets offer the greatest flexibility and ease of use. Whether shaping jumps or clearing clay, the right equipment turns a challenging job into a rewarding craft.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Locating Wiring Information for the Hough H30 Loader MikePhua 0 71 01-07-2026, 06:24 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Skillful Dozer Operation in Challenging Conditions MikePhua 0 76 12-30-2025, 08:45 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  100 HP Dozer Fuel Use MikePhua 0 107 12-30-2025, 08:42 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Demag H185S at Work MikePhua 0 75 12-30-2025, 08:40 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  1997 CASE 580 Super L Series 2 Backhoe Loader Performance and Common Issues MikePhua 0 116 12-30-2025, 08:21 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Measuring Track Chain Wear MikePhua 0 83 12-29-2025, 03:41 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Komatsu PC07‑1 Track Installation and Adjustment MikePhua 0 84 12-29-2025, 03:27 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  LeeBoy 8515 Track Wear Problems MikePhua 0 78 12-27-2025, 07:16 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  New Holland L218 in modern construction MikePhua 0 84 12-17-2025, 03:01 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Making a Bush Hog Work on a Bobcat MikePhua 0 92 12-15-2025, 03:52 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Trading Construction Machines MikePhua 0 89 12-15-2025, 03:36 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Experience with a 1973 Case 450 Loader MikePhua 0 122 12-08-2025, 09:16 AM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Considering a 1995 John Deere 410D Backhoe Loader MikePhua 0 151 12-02-2025, 02:53 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Tragic Incident Involving Track Hoe Theft MikePhua 0 179 11-19-2025, 04:15 PM
Last Post: MikePhua
  Hough 65C Loader Sensor Configuration Reflects Transitional Design in Mid-1980s Heavy Equipment MikePhua 0 170 11-17-2025, 07:07 PM
Last Post: MikePhua

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)