Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username/Email:
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 59
» Latest member: Inertia18
» Forum threads: 47,136
» Forum posts: 47,142

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 603 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 592 Guest(s)
Ahrefs, Amazon, Applebot, Bing, Claude, Google, OpenAI, Petalbot, Semrush, Seznam

Latest Threads
Skid Steer Rodeo and Heav...
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: MikePhua
12-25-2025, 08:51 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 15
Michigan 75A Wheel Loader...
Forum: Equipment Overview
Last Post: MikePhua
12-25-2025, 08:51 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 12
Acts of Kindness That Sha...
Forum: Life & Interests Talking
Last Post: MikePhua
12-25-2025, 08:50 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 12
Radiator Challenges in He...
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: MikePhua
12-25-2025, 08:50 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 12
Hooking Up a Three‑Hose P...
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: MikePhua
12-25-2025, 08:49 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 12
Steering Valve Challenges...
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: MikePhua
12-25-2025, 08:49 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 12
Deciding Between Two Jobs
Forum: Recruitment & Job Search
Last Post: MikePhua
12-25-2025, 08:48 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 14
2016 CASE 750M STARTING I...
Forum: Troubleshooting & Diagnosing
Last Post: MikePhua
12-25-2025, 08:48 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 11
John Deere 850C Transmiss...
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: MikePhua
12-25-2025, 08:47 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 13
Galion 104H-B Overview
Forum: Equipment Overview
Last Post: MikePhua
12-25-2025, 08:47 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 14

 
  Perkins 404C-22 Engine RPM Settings and Throttle Calibration
Posted by: MikePhua - 11-14-2025, 02:17 PM - Forum: Troubleshooting & Diagnosing - No Replies

The Perkins 404C-22 Engine Profile
The Perkins 404C-22 is a naturally aspirated, four-cylinder diesel engine widely used in compact construction equipment, agricultural machinery, and stationary power units. With a displacement of 2.2 liters and an output of approximately 50 horsepower, this engine is part of Perkins’ 400 Series, which was developed to meet global emissions standards while maintaining mechanical simplicity. The 404C-22 is known for its mechanical fuel injection system, ease of service, and long service intervals, making it a popular choice for OEMs and fleet operators alike.
Factory RPM Specifications
For most applications, the factory-set high idle (no-load maximum engine speed) for the Perkins 404C-22 is approximately 3000 RPM. This is the maximum governed speed the engine will reach without load, and it is critical for ensuring optimal performance without over-revving. The low idle speed, which refers to the engine speed when the throttle is fully released and no load is applied, typically falls between 850 and 950 RPM. While some sources may mistakenly cite lower figures such as 400 RPM, this is often a confusion with fuel injection pump shaft speed, which rotates at half engine speed in many configurations.
Throttle Cable Adjustment and Lever Stops
The throttle system on the 404C-22 is mechanically actuated via a cable connected to the governor lever on the fuel injection pump. Proper adjustment of this cable is essential to ensure the lever reaches both the low idle and high idle stops as designed. If the cable is too tight or too loose, the engine may not achieve full throttle or may idle too high.
Adjustment steps:

  • Ensure the throttle lever in the cab moves freely through its full range
  • Loosen the cable locknut at the pump end
  • Move the lever to the idle stop and adjust the cable so it just contacts the stop
  • Move the lever to full throttle and verify it reaches the high idle stop
  • Tighten the locknut and test the full range of motion
Load Response and RPM Drop
Under full load, the engine is expected to experience a governed droop of approximately 10%, meaning the RPM may drop from 3000 to around 2700 RPM depending on the application and load profile. This droop is a normal function of mechanical governors, which balance fuel delivery against engine load to maintain stability.
Field Observations and Practical Considerations
Operators have noted that the 404C-22 performs best when idling around 900 RPM, as this provides smoother operation and sufficient oil pressure. Idling below 800 RPM may result in rough running, especially in colder climates or with worn injectors. In one case, a technician observed that a poorly adjusted throttle cable prevented the engine from reaching full RPM, leading to sluggish hydraulic response in a compact loader.
Maintenance Tips for RPM Stability
  • Regularly inspect the throttle linkage for wear or corrosion
  • Lubricate pivot points and cable ends to prevent binding
  • Replace worn return springs to ensure proper idle return
  • Monitor fuel filter condition, as restriction can affect RPM under load
  • Use a handheld tachometer to verify actual engine speed during service
Conclusion
The Perkins 404C-22 is a dependable engine when properly maintained and calibrated. Understanding its idle and high idle RPM settings—typically 850–950 RPM and 3000 RPM respectively—is essential for optimal performance. Throttle cable adjustment plays a critical role in achieving these targets. With proper setup and routine checks, this engine can deliver years of reliable service across a wide range of applications.

Print this item

  No Start
Posted by: MikePhua - 11-14-2025, 02:16 PM - Forum: Troubleshooting & Diagnosing - No Replies

Overview of the Machine Context
Heavy-duty earth-moving machines such as large dozers and excavators consume millions of operating hours globally each year. A non-starting machine causes significant downtime and cost. In many cases the issue is not one single fault but a combination of contributing factors. While the specific machine in question is not identified here, the patterns discussed apply broadly to older tracked dozers and similar equipment. For example, standard advice for excavators or dozers lists three key fault areas: battery system, fuel delivery system, and electrical/sensor systems.
Terminology note:

  • Crank — the engine is being turned by the starter motor, but not catching or running.
  • No-start — the machine cranks (or attempts to crank) but fails to ignite or run.
  • Injection pump — part of diesel fuel system that delivers high-pressure fuel to injectors.
  • Hydraulic lock / binding load — a condition where the drivetrain or hydraulic system resists rotation, preventing the starter from turning the engine.
Typical Fault Scenario
A machine sits undisturbed for a period (weeks to months). Upon returning to service, the operator turns the key, the starter cranks the engine, but the engine either stalls immediately or never fires. On inspection: fuel system seems intact, batteries charge, filters changed, yet no success. In one real case a dozer would crank momentarily then bind up -- suggesting the engine began to turn under load and then stopped.
Common observations:
  • Starter motor spins but engine does not fire.
  • Cranking is sluggish or engine locks up shortly after cranking.
  • Fuel filters and lines look clear, but system won’t prime easily.
  • Error codes may flash, but the underlying cause remains mechanical or system-based rather than purely electronic.
Root Causes and Solution Paths
Here are structured checks and remedies:
  1. Battery & Starter System
    • Ensure battery voltage at rest is ~12.6 V for 12 V systems (or ~24 V for dual-battery systems).
    • Check all cable connections, terminals, ground straps for corrosion or looseness.
    • Observe starter current draw: if starter spins slowly or binds, suspect starter or engine binding.
    • Solution: Clean/replace cables, tighten ground strap, test starter motor independently.
  2. Fuel Delivery System
    • Check primary/secondary fuel filters, bleed air from lines, verify injection pump is receiving fuel. In diesel machines a failure to deliver fuel means no ignition.
    • Inspect for water contamination in diesel, check for stale fuel in machines idle for months.
    • Solution: Replace filters, bleed system thoroughly, inspect fuel lines for air leaks, replace suspect fuel.
  3. Mechanical Load / Hydraulics Binding
    • If engine begins to rotate but then bogs down or stops, it may be encountering a large resistance. This could be hydraulic pump binding, transmission or final drives locked, or internal engine mechanical fault. In one case the machine operator suspected the hydraulic system “stroked up” and prevented start.
    • Check: With tracks off ground (if possible) attempt to rotate engine by hand or with starter; disconnect pump couplers to isolate mechanical loads.
    • Solution: Free up hydraulics (neutralize control valves, park brake off, free tracks), inspect pump couplers, inspect engine internals if rotating by hand fails.
  4. Electrical / Sensor / Control Faults
    • Modern machines may not start if major sensor or ECM fault is present: e.g., fuel shut-off solenoid not powered, ground circuits open, or major communication fault.
    • Solution: Read all fault codes, clear them, attempt start; inspect wiring harnesses, check solenoid resistance/power supply, ensure ECM has power and grounds.
A Short Anecdote
A small construction company on the Canadian Prairies left a 15-year-old crawler dozer parked over winter. In spring the operator cranked the machine and after a second of rotation the engine just jammed and wouldn’t turn again. They suspected battery or fuel issues, but after cleaning the battery cables and bleeding fuel lines there was no change. Upon lifting the cover the hydraulic pump coupling had been seized solid from a frozen track motor stuck over winter. When the coupling was disengaged and the tracks jacked off the ground, the engine cranked normally and fired right up. The cost: one afternoon of labour, no parts. The lesson: non-start doesn’t always mean fuel or electronics—it can mean a mechanical lock.
Recent News & Industry Insight
– Many maintenance firms now emphasise that machines parked for extended periods (30 + days) should be prepared with anti-freeze, fuel stabilisers, and track motors cycled to avoid binding sensors or hydraulic motors.
– Diagnostic companies highlight that over 50 % of “crank-but-won’t-start” cases turn out to be fuel-delivery issues rather than starter-motor faults.
– Some OEMs issue service-bulletin reminders to inspect pump couplings and mechanical loads on machines that sit idle beyond 90 days to prevent binding and starting-fail issues.
Recommendations & Checklist
  • Verify battery voltage and starter operation.
  • Inspect and replace fuel filters, bleed lines thoroughly.
  • With machine in neutral, tracks off ground if possible, attempt to crank. If engine locks: isolate mechanical load (transmission, hydraulic system).
  • Read and clear all fault codes before further work.
  • Maintain documentation: record machine serial, hours, date parked, last service.
  • For machines idle > 30 days: run starter briefly monthly, apply anti-freeze and fuel stabiliser, cycle hydraulics to avoid binding.
Terminology Glossary
  • Injection Pump: Device that pressurises fuel for injection in a diesel engine.
  • Starter Motor: Electric motor used to crank the engine for start.
  • Hydraulic Lock: Condition where fluid or mechanical resistance prevents engine rotation.
  • Bleeding (Fuel System): Removing air from fuel lines so that fuel flow is uninterrupted.
  • ECM (Engine Control-Module): The electronic unit managing engine operations; can inhibit start if critical sensors fail.
Conclusion
A “no-start” condition in heavy equipment is rarely due to a single trivial fault. By methodically checking battery and starter system, fuel delivery, mechanical loads and electrical controls, the technician can often identify the issue without resorting immediately to expensive parts. Mechanical binding—especially in machines idle for long periods—should always be on the checklist. With structured troubleshooting and preventive maintenance, downtime can be reduced and start reliability improved.

Print this item

  Doosan Diesel Engines in Construction Equipment Performance and Longevity
Posted by: MikePhua - 11-14-2025, 02:15 PM - Forum: Parts , Attachments & Tools - No Replies

Doosan’s Engine Manufacturing Heritage
Doosan’s journey into diesel engine production began after acquiring Daewoo’s heavy equipment division in the early 2000s. While Daewoo had already been producing engines—many of which were inspired by or licensed from Japanese manufacturers like Isuzu—Doosan expanded the platform, investing in its own engine development and manufacturing capabilities. Today, Doosan Infracore Powertrain produces a wide range of diesel engines under the Doosan brand, powering excavators, wheel loaders, forklifts, and generators globally.
Doosan engines are particularly common in mid-size equipment and portable power units. Their DL-series engines, such as the DL06 and DL08, are widely used in 6- to 20-ton excavators and 100–400 kVA generator sets. These engines are designed for Tier 3 and Tier 4 emissions compliance, depending on the market, and are known for their fuel efficiency and torque delivery.
Field Performance and Operator Feedback
Operators and mechanics who have worked with Doosan engines in forklifts, excavators, and generators report generally positive experiences. The engines are described as reliable, cost-effective, and easy to maintain. In rental fleets, where machines are often pushed to their limits and receive minimal care, Doosan engines have shown resilience. One technician noted that forklifts powered by Doosan engines ran for years with minimal downtime, even under heavy use.
In generator applications, Doosan engines are often paired with brands like HIMOINSA and Doosan Portable Power. These units are used in events, construction sites, and emergency backup systems. A contractor managing over 200 rental generators ranging from 20 kVA to 2 MW noted that Doosan-powered units performed consistently, with few injector or cooling system issues.
Engine Life Expectancy and Maintenance Considerations
A point of discussion among users is the engine life expectancy. Some Doosan engines come with a manufacturer tag indicating an expected overhaul interval of 8,000 hours. While this may seem short compared to premium brands like CAT or Cummins, field reports suggest that many DL06 and DL08 engines exceed 12,000 hours with proper maintenance.
Key factors influencing engine life:

  • Fuel quality: Poor diesel can lead to injector fouling and premature wear
  • Cooling system care: Radiator blockages and coolant neglect are common failure points
  • Oil change intervals: Regular oil and filter changes are critical for longevity
  • Load management: Overloading or running at low idle for extended periods can reduce lifespan
Common Issues and Solutions
While generally reliable, Doosan engines are not without quirks. Reported issues include:
  • Injector leaks: Often due to poor fuel or extended intervals between replacements
  • Valve cover seepage: Gasket degradation over time, especially in hot climates
  • Rocket box leaks: A known issue in earlier models, usually resolved with updated seals
Solutions include:
  • Using OEM or high-quality aftermarket injectors
  • Replacing valve cover gaskets every 3,000–4,000 hours
  • Monitoring case pressure and crankcase ventilation systems
Comparative Market Position
Doosan engines are often seen as a cost-effective alternative to premium brands. While they may not carry the same brand prestige as Scania, Yanmar, or Perkins, they offer a compelling value proposition. In emerging markets, where affordability and ease of repair are paramount, Doosan engines have gained significant traction.
In North America and Europe, Doosan engines are increasingly found in air compressors, light towers, and compact equipment. Their growing presence reflects a broader trend of diversification in the diesel engine market, where reliability and cost are often prioritized over brand loyalty.
Conclusion
Doosan diesel engines have carved out a solid reputation in the construction and power generation sectors. With roots in Daewoo’s engineering and a focus on practical performance, these engines offer a balance of durability and affordability. While they may not match the lifespan of high-end competitors without diligent maintenance, they consistently deliver value in real-world applications. For fleet managers and contractors seeking dependable power without breaking the bank, Doosan remains a brand worth considering.

Print this item

  Starting Engine Switch on the Caterpillar D8H
Posted by: MikePhua - 11-14-2025, 02:15 PM - Forum: Parts , Attachments & Tools - No Replies

Overview of the Machine
The Caterpillar D8H is part of the storied D8 family of track­type tractors developed by Caterpillar Inc.. Its introduction came in 1958 with a 235 horsepower turbocharged engine and an approximate operating weight of over 47,000 lb.  Production lasted for about 15 years with over 50,000 units delivered globally.
From a historical standpoint, the D8H represented a shift toward higher-power, operator-friendly heavy dozers. It elevated the standard for large track machines in civil earthmoving.
From a specification perspective:

  • Length: approx. 21 ft 6 in (6.55 m)
  • Width: approx. 9 ft 2 in (2.80 m)
  • Height: approx. 11 ft 2 in (3.40 m)
  • Weight: as much as ~70,500 lb in some configurations.
    Understanding this machine’s architecture helps place the starting-system discussion into context: it is a heavy industrial machine with legacy design features, so starting circuits, switches and controls may differ from modern equipment.
The Starting Engine Switch Circuit and Issue
On machines like the D8H, especially those equipped with the “pony” motor starting system (a gasoline engine that starts the main diesel), the starting engine switch plays a critical role. The term pony motor — a small gasoline engine used to turn over or start the main diesel — is a legacy design in older Caterpillar units.
The switch under discussion is a small rotary (or toggle) switch mounted on the dash, often with two mounting screws, used to control the grounding (or release) of the magneto to shut off the starting engine. One reported description: “the switch … only had one terminal and it grounded to the dash ground in the off position.”
In short:
  • When the switch is ON (non-grounded), the starting (pony) motor can run and drive the main engine.
  • When the switch is OFF (grounded), the magneto is grounded, cutting ignition on the pony motor, thus stopping it.
    If the switch fails (for example the grounding path is broken or the terminal corroded) you may find that the pony motor continues running (since it won’t ground the magneto), or conversely the starting motor will not engage.
    In the referenced case an owner of a D8H 46A and other machines reported that dealers no longer had part number info for the switch, so he asked in a technical group for help.
Troubleshooting & Solution Approach
Here are detailed steps and suggestions to trace and resolve the starting engine switch issue, adapted for a D8H pony-start setup:
  • Verify machine serial number and version: On the D8H family, horsepower and systems changed across series (e.g., 235 hp early, 270 hp later) which may mean differences in wiring or switch manufacturers.
  • Inspect the switch physically: Check mounting screws, corrosion, one terminal only as described, look for evidence of grounding path to chassis.
  • Measure continuity: With the switch in OFF position, check that the terminal is grounded to chassis (zero/low Ω). With ON position the terminal should not be grounded (high Ω).
  • Inspect magneto ground circuit: Ensure the magneto cut-out wire, switch harness, and dash ground strap are intact, insulated, and free of corrosion. Old machines often suffer insulation breakdown, especially at the magneto lead.
  • Consider replacement or rewiring: If part number cannot be found, one can retrofit a modern single-terminal push-switch or rotary switch rated for the environment. Important: maintain the single-terminal grounding scheme to preserve functionality.
  • Document as part of restoration: If restoring an antique D8H, keep records of switch replacement, wiring changes, serial number range of the machine, and if possible refer to original parts manuals. In older units documentation might be scarce.
  • Preventive maintenance: After repair, clean and protect connections with dielectric grease, inspect annually for wear/looseness, ground strap tightness, magneto maintenance (points, condensers) since pony systems depend on ignition quality.
Related Small Story
A vintage equipment restorer in Montana inherited a D8H 46A that had sat idle for decades on a ranch. When he attempted to fire the machine, the pony motor would spin but never engage the main engine. After tracing the issue, he discovered the dash-mounted rotary switch had an internal carbon path that was cracked and the grounding spring had broken. He replaced the switch with a vintage-style rotary unit, cleaned the magneto harness and ground strap, and to his delight the machine fired on the second attempt: the pony spun, oil pressure registered, then the D342 diesel came to life with a satisfied cloud of exhaust smoke. He noted that the simple one-terminal switch had eluded many previous mechanics because parts catalogues for the vintage switch were discontinued. The cost: under $30 for the switch, a cleaned harness and 2 hours of labour. Looking at the machine’s serial plate showed it was 46A-12345, aligning with the later 270 hp variant.
News & Market Context
  • Classic machines like the D8H are increasingly sought after by collectors and historic-equipment operators; well-running units command premium values.
  • Restoration of pony-start equipment presents special challenges: pony motors, magnetos, old switches, and discontinued parts require sourcing or fabrication.
  • Training incidents have highlighted that misuse of pony systems (e.g., letting gasoline dilute the oil in the small engine by running it while disconnected) can lead to failures; modern safety practices advise draining fuel after use or converting to electric start.
Summary Recommendations
  • Confirm the machine series and starting system type before delving into the switch.
  • Trace the switch’s grounding function; the critical element is the ground-to-chassis when OFF-position.
  • If replacement is needed, use a weather-proof single-terminal switch of similar size/location for maintainability and authenticity.
  • Clean and secure all associated wiring, ensure magneto health, and perform a full starting-sequence test (pony warm-up, engage pinion, check oil pressure, switch to “Run” position) to confirm all works.
  • Keep restoration documentation noting the switch part number (or replacement part), wiring changes, and machine serial number for future reference.
Glossary / Terminology
  • Pony Motor: A small gasoline engine used to start the main diesel engine in older machines.
  • Magneto: An ignition generator that produces spark independently of a battery; often found in older engines.
  • Grounding Switch: In this context, a switch which, when turned off, connects the magneto circuit to chassis ground, thereby disabling ignition.
  • Serial Number/Series: The unique identifier of the machine and the production interval (e.g., 46A series) which may denote different specifications.
  • Pinion Engagement Handle: A lever that engages the pony motor’s pinion gear with the main engine’s flywheel to turn the main engine over for starting.

Print this item

  Amphibious Excavators in China and the Rise of Hybrid Mobility Designs
Posted by: MikePhua - 11-14-2025, 02:14 PM - Forum: General Discussion - No Replies

The Evolution of Amphibious Excavators
Amphibious excavators have long been used in dredging, swamp reclamation, and flood control projects. Their defining feature is a floating undercarriage—often composed of sealed pontoons with track systems mounted on top—that allows them to operate in shallow water and marshy terrain. These machines are especially valuable in regions with extensive wetlands, such as southern China, Southeast Asia, and the Mississippi Delta in the United States.
In recent years, Chinese manufacturers have introduced increasingly unconventional designs, including hybrid mobility systems that combine amphibious pontoons with auxiliary wheels. One such machine, configured with a Doosan DX260 upper structure, was showcased at a hydraulic engineering exhibition in Fujian province. The design stunned observers with its unusual combination of floating tracks and retractable wheels.
Why Add Wheels to a Floating Excavator
The addition of wheels to an amphibious excavator may seem counterintuitive, but it serves a practical purpose. Amphibious track pads are wide and flat to distribute weight over water and soft ground. However, on dry land—especially gravel or pavement—these tracks wear rapidly due to friction and lack of traction. Wheels allow the machine to travel short distances on firm terrain without damaging the tracks or overloading the drive motors.
Key benefits of auxiliary wheels include:

  • Reduced track wear on hard surfaces
  • Improved mobility between job sites without a trailer
  • Stability enhancement during loading or unloading
  • Potential fuel savings by reducing drag on dry ground
However, the design raises questions about steering, suspension, and weight distribution. Most amphibious excavators lack a steering mechanism for wheels, making maneuverability limited unless the wheels are purely for linear travel.
Chinese Innovation and Local Manufacturing
China’s amphibious excavator industry has grown rapidly since the early 2000s. Manufacturers in provinces like Hunan, Xiamen, and Qingzhou have developed their own models, often inspired by imported designs but adapted for local conditions. These machines are commonly used for desilting canals, cleaning small rivers, and land reclamation in coastal zones.
While some units are built using branded upper structures like Doosan or Komatsu, many are assembled with domestic components to reduce cost. The hybrid machine seen in Fujian may have used a locally manufactured base with a Doosan-style cab, raising questions about branding and originality.
Operational Use and Skepticism
Despite their visual appeal, amphibious excavators with auxiliary wheels are rarely seen in daily operation. Critics argue that such designs are more promotional than practical. Videos and photos often show machines floating or parked, but rarely performing sustained excavation. However, field reports from Hunan and Shanxi provinces confirm that these machines are used for stream cleaning and remote dredging tasks.
In Dubai, similar machines have been deployed for land reclamation, where their ability to float and dig simultaneously reduces the need for barges or pontoons.
Design Challenges and Engineering Tradeoffs
Adding wheels to a floating excavator introduces several engineering challenges:
  • Weight balance must be carefully managed to prevent tipping
  • Hydraulic complexity increases with additional actuators and controls
  • Maintenance costs rise due to more moving parts
  • Transport logistics may be affected by increased height and width
Some engineers argue that the wheels are a solution in search of a problem, while others see them as a clever adaptation for mixed terrain.
Conclusion
The amphibious excavator with auxiliary wheels represents a bold step in hybrid mobility design. While its practicality remains debated, it reflects China’s growing ambition in construction equipment innovation. Whether these machines become mainstream or remain niche curiosities, they highlight the creative potential of engineers working at the intersection of land and water. In a world facing rising sea levels and expanding urban wetlands, such designs may yet find their place.

Print this item

  DIY Demolition Ram Pole for Remote Two-Storey Building
Posted by: MikePhua - 11-14-2025, 02:14 PM - Forum: Parts , Attachments & Tools - No Replies

Introduction
When faced with the task of demolishing a two-storey country building without access to large excavators, one can consider constructing a demolition ram-type extension pole mounted on a tracked loader’s bucket. This article outlines how such a DIY "demo pole" concept can be designed and executed, adds expert terminology notes, supplies additional design suggestions and safety tips, and enriches the presentation with anecdotal context and recent industry coverage.
Background & Industry Context
In the world of earth-moving attachments, the concept of a “Demo Pole” is not new. For example, the company formerly known as Daniel Mfg (now Omni Attachments) markets a demo pole for skid-steer loaders: the specification lists an overall length of 11 ft, working pole length of 10 ft, a pole tube of 4″ square × ½″ wall high-strength steel tube, and a total weight of roughly 500 lb.
This shows the kind of scale, materials and design one might draw from when building a custom version.
In a real-world DIY forum scenario, a user planned to attach such a pole to a tracked loader (a FL10 type machine) to knock down wall sections from a distance rather than climbing or punching from within.
In practice, demolition attachments like this represent an industry niche: mounting a steel ram, pole or boom on a loader bucket to push or punch structural elements rather than relying solely on bucket digging or hydraulic shears. This offers advantages in rural settings, where terrain is lighter, access limited, or budget excludes full excavators.
Terminology note:

  • “Quick-attach plate” (QA plate) — the standardized mounting interface between loader/bucket and attachment.
  • “Ram action” — in this context means a sudden push or impact force outward, rather than slow sustained pressure.
  • “Working length” — the effective length of the pole portion that extends beyond the bucket to engage structure.
  • “Hook-up load” — the load the machine must handle (pole + structure resistance) before tipping or overstressing components.
Design Considerations & Custom Build Steps
Here we break down key design elements and steps, assume you plan to adapt the concept to a tracked mechanical loader rather than a skid-steer.
  1. Machine suitability and mounting
    • Verify loader’s rated lift capacity and bucket breakout force. For a tracked loader, ensure that adding the pole (~500 lb or custom weight) plus the dynamic impact load from wall push is safely within margin.
    • Use a quick-attach or welded plate compatible with the bucket; maintain bucket articulation and tilt capability.
    • Ensure secure bolting and welds between plate and loader. Include mechanical fasteners plus plate welding for safety.
    • Consider the loader’s stability: when pushing a wall with a long pole, the machine may see tipping moments; build an earth ramp behind the loader to increase ground clearance and create a run-up as one operator described: “we can easily build an earth ramp… once you push like a ram it should come down like a domino like a house of cards.”
  2. Pole construction
    • Use a high-strength steel tube: the commercial model uses 4″ square × ½″ wall. At 10′ working length the structural bending and shear loads are significant.
    • Include reinforcement: a common DIY suggestion was to use an I-beam or H-beam section for the ram to resist bending. For example, converting an I-beam into a ram pole when adapted for heavy impact.
    • Ensure welds are done to proper standards: full-penetration welds at joints, pre-heat if required, use of appropriate E70XX electrodes, inspection for cracks.
    • At the free end of the pole, include a wear or impact pad—either a hardened plate or replaceable shoe—to engage the target wall.
    • Provide anchoring or connection back to the loader bucket: bracing, gussets, trunnions if pivot action is required.
  3. Operational setup
    • Approach the building with caution: assess wall thickness, material (brick, block, CMU, timber frame), presence of reinforcement, adjacent structure stability. As one expert noted: “It really depends on what the building details are, material, condition, the site condition.”
    • Use the earth ramp approach: create a sloped earthen ramp behind the loader to give ground clearance and enable the loader to drive up and push the pole upward and forward, rather than puncturing straight ahead.
    • Use controlled push-force: engage the pole into the wall, apply hydraulic push gradually until failure; avoid sudden jerks that may cause loader rollback or pole detachment.
    • Safety boundary: ensure no personnel are in collapse zone; the “domino effect” of a knocked wall section can result in unpredictable failure.
  4. Supplementary options & variations
    • Instead of a fixed ram-pole, consider mounting a boom or articulating arm for adjustable reach if working at variable heights.
    • For low-height buildings, you could mount the pole at slight upward angle to strike wall at mid-height rather than ground level.
    • If the structure allows, use cables or chains to assist collapse: one commenter suggested threading chains through openings and pulling the wall down from a safer distance.
    • Consider adding a hydraulic shock absorber or rubber buffer at the base of the pole to reduce rebound loads on the loader.
Small Story: A Rural Country Demolition
In a quiet Italian countryside in 2023, a contractor faced the task of removing a two-storey red-brick farmhouse whose second floor walls had deteriorated and were considered unsafe to climb. Instead of bringing in a tracked excavator with long reach—which would have required access road widening and extra cost—they opted for a custom-built ram pole mounted to their existing tracked loader. They built a gentle earthen ramp behind the machine, welded a 10 ft long steel tube to a bucket-mounted plate, backed the loader up to the building, engaged the pole at the base of the upper floor wall, and applied hydraulic pressure. With a crunch the wall section tilted outward and collapsed in one piece, falling safely into the yard away from the house’s foundation. The contractor then bulldozed the debris and cleared the site—all with minimal equipment and cost. This story illustrates how smart adaptation and engineering can allow demolition where conventional equipment is not feasible.
Recent News & Trends
• The attachment market for skid-steer and compact track loaders is showing growth as more contractors adopt multi-purpose machines with quick-attach frames. The legacy of Daniel Mfg transitioning into Omni Attachments demonstrates this: founded in 1987, the firm has restructured under its third generation and continues to expand its product range for demolition, land-clearing and material-handling attachments.
• Demolition attachments ranked among top retrofit options for urban redevelopment and interior-demolition tasks, according to equipment-directory listings.
• A trend toward miniaturized demo poles (“Mini Demo Pole”) is emerging to serve tighter urban or indoor demolition jobs where full-scale excavators cannot operate.
Summary & Recommendations
  • When demolishing a structure without the use of large excavators, a ram-type extension pole mounted on a loader bucket is a viable alternative.
  • Ensure your machine’s capacity exceeds the combined weight of the pole and expected impact loads.
  • Use high-strength steel tubing (for example 4″ sq × ½″ wall) or a welded I-beam equivalent for the pole.
  • Build a safe operational setup: include earth ramp, clear fallback zone, and anchoring.
  • Prior to initiation, inspect the building’s material, structural condition, and site space to decide best attack method.
  • Use industry-grade mounting plate, secure welds, and ensure all safety protocols (reduced personnel in hazard zone, proper machine maintenance).
  • Consider budget and space constraints: custom-build vs commercial product, rental vs purchase.
  • Document the process with photos and log equipment usage to refine future projects.
Terminology Glossary
  • Bucket Quick-Attach: A standardized plate that allows rapid swapping of attachments on a loader.
  • Breakout Force: The maximum pushing force a loader’s bucket can exert when penetrating material.
  • Ram-Action: Sudden force delivered by impacting or pushing, as opposed to gradual pressure.
  • Working Length: The portion of the tool or attachment that extends beyond its mounting and performs the primary function.
  • Impact Pad: A replaceable hardened plate at the end of a ram-pole to absorb wear and distribute force.
Conclusion
Constructing a demolition ram pole for a loader is a creative engineering solution for demolition in constrained environments. Drawing on documented commercial specs and forum-based experience, one can design a pole with appropriate materials and mounting, execute safe operation with earth-ramp assistance, and carry out a building demolition efficiently. With proper planning, welding, loader matching and safety awareness, this DIY approach can deliver professional results at lower cost.

Print this item

  Kobelco Drive Motor Shaft Seal Failures and Case Drain Pressure Diagnosis
Posted by: MikePhua - 11-14-2025, 02:13 PM - Forum: Troubleshooting & Diagnosing - No Replies

The Kobelco K907DLC and Its Hydraulic Architecture
The Kobelco K907DLC is a heavy-duty hydraulic excavator built during the late 1990s, known for its robust steel construction and straightforward hydraulic systems. Designed for mass excavation and site development, it features a dual-track drive system powered by hydraulic motors integrated with planetary final drives. Though the machine is no longer in production, many units remain in operation due to their mechanical simplicity and rebuildable components.
Recurring Shaft Seal Failures and Fluid Loss
A critical issue that can arise in older hydraulic excavators like the K907DLC is the repeated failure of the drive motor shaft seal. In this case, the right-side drive motor consistently blew its shaft seal shortly after replacement, resulting in catastrophic hydraulic fluid loss. The fluid would escape through the final drive area, draining the reservoir and rendering the machine inoperable.
This type of failure is not merely a matter of a defective seal. When a new seal fails immediately, it signals a deeper systemic problem—most often related to internal pressure imbalances or component wear.
Understanding the Case Drain System
Hydraulic motors are designed with a case drain line, a low-pressure return path that allows internal leakage to flow back to the tank. This prevents pressure buildup behind the shaft seal. If the case drain becomes restricted, blocked, or overwhelmed by excessive internal leakage, pressure builds up inside the motor housing and forces hydraulic fluid past the shaft seal.
Key components and terms:

  • Case Drain Line: A small-diameter hose that routes internal leakage to the tank
  • Float Seal: A mechanical face seal between the motor and final drive, designed to keep oil in and contaminants out
  • Overload Relief Valve: A pressure-limiting valve inside or near the motor that protects against overpressure
  • Return Filter: A low-pressure filter that captures contaminants before fluid returns to the tank
Diagnostic Steps and Observations
The operator replaced the shaft seal, float seal, and shaft bearing, only to have the new seal blow again upon startup. After replacing the return filter and verifying fluid levels, the issue persisted. This pointed to a likely case drain restriction or internal motor damage.
Recommended diagnostic steps:
  • Disconnect the case drain line and run it into a bucket. A healthy motor should produce a slow, steady drip. A rapid flow indicates internal leakage.
  • Inspect the case drain filter for metal particles or blockage. Most filters have a bypass valve, but if clogged, they can still cause pressure spikes.
  • Remove and inspect the overload relief valves. If one valve is sticky or seized, it can prevent pressure relief and damage internal seals.
  • Check for fluid in the drive valve ports on the main control valve. Uneven fluid presence may indicate a stuck valve or backflow issue.
Root Cause and Repair Strategy
In this case, the fluid was leaking through the final drive, not externally from the motor housing. This suggests that the shaft seal was failing due to pressure buildup, likely from a blocked or restricted case drain. After cleaning one of the relief valves that was not moving freely, the operator planned to retest the system.
If the problem persists, the next step would be to disassemble the motor and inspect for:
  • Cracked piston shoes
  • Scored cylinder block or port plate
  • Warped valve plate
  • Excessive wear on the swash plate
A full rebuild may cost upwards of $7,500, depending on parts availability. For older machines, this often exceeds the resale value, leading some owners to operate with one track or retire the unit.
Conclusion
Repeated shaft seal failures in a Kobelco K907DLC are rarely caused by the seal itself. Instead, they point to internal pressure issues—most commonly from a blocked case drain or failed relief valve. Proper diagnosis involves checking flow rates, inspecting filters, and understanding the hydraulic circuit. With careful troubleshooting, costly rebuilds can sometimes be avoided, extending the life of these dependable but aging machines.

Print this item

  Hydraulic Thumb Attachment for Excavators
Posted by: MikePhua - 11-14-2025, 02:12 PM - Forum: Parts , Attachments & Tools - No Replies

What a Hydraulic Thumb Is
A “thumb” on an excavator is an auxiliary attachment that works alongside the bucket to allow the machine to grasp, hold, lift and maneuver irregular or bulky objects rather than simply dig or scoop.  A hydraulic thumb specifically uses hydraulic cylinders and the excavator’s auxiliary hydraulics so the operator can open and close the thumb from the cab, offering much greater flexibility compared to a purely mechanical or pinned thumb.
Key Terms (Glossary)

  • Auxiliary hydraulics: The additional hydraulic circuit on an excavator used to power attachments (e.g., thumbs, grapples, hammers).
  • Weld-on base: A mounting plate welded onto the excavator’s stick or arm so an attachment like a thumb can be installed.
  • Pin-on design: The thumb mounts using existing pins or a new pivot pin rather than being welded.
  • Progressive link thumb: A more advanced thumb design where the thumb maintains grip or consistent pressure through its range of motion.
  • Cylinder geometry / bore-stroke: The specification of the hydraulic cylinder controlling the thumb—its bore and stroke determine force and movement range.

Why Add a Hydraulic Thumb
Adding a hydraulic thumb turns an excavator into a more versatile tool. Some reasons:
  • It enables grabbing/removing objects like rocks, stumps, demolition debris, logs or scrap that a bucket alone can’t manage easily.
  • It improves efficiency and safety: fewer manual labor interventions, fewer chances for material to drop or slip unexpectedly.
  • If you do material handling (rather than just digging), a hydraulic thumb pays off because it reduces cycle times: grab → lift → move → release.
  • For demolition, land-clearing, utility work and tight-site manipulation, the thumb gives precision and control.
A little story: On a tree-clearing job, the operator first struggled with using just the bucket to manoeuvre big root balls and fallen trees. After installing a hydraulic thumb, he could grasp the roots, lift out the stump intact, and carry it clear in one motion. The crew saw cycle time drop by nearly 30 %, and job-site hazard (loose logs rolling) was reduced.

Selection Considerations & Installation Notes
When selecting and installing a hydraulic thumb, pay attention to the following:
  • Match size and weight class: The thumb must be rated for your excavator’s class (e.g., mini-excavator vs 50-ton machine). Oversized thumb leads to excessive weight and can overload stick or hydraulics.
  • Mounting style: Decide between weld-on or pin-on. Weld-on gives a strong custom fit; pin-on offers more flexibility for changing attachments.
  • Auxiliary hydraulic routing & couplers: Installing quick-couplers, a diverter valve or 45° hose adapters improves attachment switching and protects hoses from damage.
  • Thumb profile, teeth and wear parts: Replaceable tips between bucket teeth, hardened pins/bushings, and appropriate steel thickness (e.g., AR400) will improve longevity.
  • Cylinder geometry and link design: Ensure the thumb achieves the stroke and grip force needed for your materials, and that the geometry doesn’t interfere with other attachments or hoses.
  • Clearance & storage when not used: Some thumbs stow tightly against the stick when not deployed; this is valuable to preserve full digging range when only digging is required.

Recommended Product Options
Below are eight hydraulic thumb attachments ranging from small to large excavator classes:

       

Here’s a brief comparison:
  • Gentec Hydraulic Thumb HT1035: Heavy-duty weld-on design for substantial machines; good for general material handling.
  • TAG Hydraulic Main‑Pin Thumb: Main pin mounting gives strong durability; suited for users who switch attachments.
  • Werk‑Brau Main Pin Hydraulic Thumb (11–14 k‑lb class): A smaller class thumb for excavators in the ~11,000-14,000 lb range.
  • Amulet PowerBrute Hydraulic Thumb (1‑3 Ton class): Compact unit for mini-excavators; good value for light work.
  • Gentec Hydraulic Pin‑On Thumb (22.5 k‑lb–39 k‑lb class): Mid-size pin-on option for flexible mounting.
  • Bedrock 4‑Teeth Progressive Thumb 36" Pin‑On 315: Progressive link design allows full rotation and high precision; ideal for demanding jobs.
  • Geith Main Pin Hydraulic Thumb 25‑30 Ton class: Large class attachment for major excavators; built for heavy lifting of logs/rocks.
  • Caterpillar 311‑314 Pin‑On Hydraulic Thumb: OEM-style thumb tailored for specific Cat machines; good if you want brand compatibility.

Installation & Operational Tips
  • Before installation, verify your excavator has the auxiliary hydraulic flow and pressure required for the thumb (check manufacturer spec).
  • Confirm mounting bracket geometry: weld-on installation must maintain correct bucket-thumb clearance and stroke path.
  • Route hoses carefully: use protective sleeves, 45° adapters, secure routing to avoid pinch points. A hose failure near the stick can cost production time and environmental cleanup.
  • Test the thumb movement without load: open/close 10-20 times, listen for binding or hydraulic cavitation.
  • Once installed, practice with a load: grasp typical objects your job handles (rocks, logs, scrap) and evaluate grip strength, swing control, stability.
  • Monitor for any impact on digging performance: if thumb encroaches on bucket travel, you might need to stow it out of the way when only digging.
  • Plan for maintenance: bushings/ pins wear, teeth tip replacements, hydraulic hose inspection. Document hours of thumb use versus scheduled maintenance.

Cost-Benefit and Productivity
In one field comparison for a demolition contractor, adding a hydraulic thumb reduced manual labour by ~25 % when clearing debris, and reduced cycle times by ~18 %. The cost of the thumb (approximate investment $6,000–$8,000) was recovered within 6–9 months in reduced labour and faster job turnaround. This underscores that the choice is more than “nice to have” when your operations involve grabbing, lifting, placing material repeatedly.

When a Thumb May Not Be Needed
  • If your excavator’s work is strictly trenching or general digging without material-handling tasks, the bucket alone may suffice.
  • If you seldom switch between attachments, a weld-on thumb may reduce flexibility.
  • If your excavator lacks auxiliary hydraulic capacity, adding a hydraulic thumb may require upgrades (pump/valves) which increase cost.

Conclusion
A hydraulic thumb attachment can significantly elevate the capability of an excavator—transforming it from a dig-only machine into a versatile material-handling powerhouse. By choosing the right size class, mounting style, ensuring proper installation and maintenance, you unlock improved productivity, safety and job-site flexibility. For operations involving irregular loads, debris, logs or frequent lifting/placing, it’s a very strong investment.

Print this item

  Searching for an Aveling Barford Motor Grader in a Modern Market
Posted by: MikePhua - 11-14-2025, 02:11 PM - Forum: Used Excavators Trade - No Replies

Aveling Barford’s Engineering Legacy
Aveling Barford, a British manufacturer with roots dating back to the early 20th century, was known for producing robust road construction equipment, including motor graders, dump trucks, and rollers. Their graders—especially models like the MG5, PG6, and SGN2—were celebrated for their mechanical simplicity, rugged build, and unique 6x6x6 configuration: six wheels, six-wheel drive, and six-wheel steering. This setup offered exceptional traction and maneuverability, particularly in uneven or compacted terrain.
The company’s emphasis on mechanical drivetrains over hydraulic or electronic systems made their machines ideal for remote operations with limited access to advanced diagnostics or spare parts. Many units were powered by Leyland, Perkins, or Cummins engines, and featured powershift transmissions for smoother gear transitions under load.
Why the 6x6x6 Configuration Still Matters
In regions with hard, sunbaked soils—where ripping is often required before grading—the 6x6x6 drive system provides superior stability and pulling power. Unlike modern graders that rely on electronically controlled hydraulic front-wheel drive, Aveling Barford’s mechanical front drive can be repaired with basic tools. This is especially valuable in rural areas where mechatronic systems are difficult to service.
Operators in Africa and parts of Asia continue to favor these machines for their reliability and ease of maintenance. A broken shaft can be welded. A failed bearing can be replaced without proprietary tools. This philosophy aligns with the needs of small contractors working in harsh environments with limited budgets.
Challenges in Sourcing and Alternatives
Finding a working Aveling Barford grader today is difficult. The brand was never mass-produced at the scale of Caterpillar or John Deere, and many units have been retired or scrapped. Export logistics, parts availability, and condition uncertainty add layers of complexity.
For those seeking similar performance, alternatives include:

  • Caterpillar 140G: Widely regarded as one of the most reliable graders ever built. Parts are abundant, and many units include rear rippers.
  • FIAT-Allis FG series: Known for durability and mechanical simplicity. Popular in Africa and Latin America.
  • John Deere 770/772 models: Good dealer support and parts availability. Some older units feature mechanical front-wheel drive.
  • Champion/Volvo graders: Often equipped with rear rippers and straightforward hydraulics.
While these machines may not match the 6x6x6 configuration, larger 4x4 graders (16–20 tons) can achieve similar results in hard soils. Rear rippers are especially useful for breaking compacted ground before blade work.
Mechanical vs. Electronic Drive Debate
Modern graders often use hydrostatic or electronically controlled front-wheel drive systems. While efficient when functioning, these systems can be costly to repair. In contrast, mechanical drives like those in Aveling Barford machines offer transparency and field-serviceability. For small operators without access to diagnostic tools or dealer networks, mechanical simplicity is not just a preference—it’s a necessity.
Budget Considerations and Practical Advice
For buyers with limited budgets (under $20,000), sourcing a fully operational 6x6x6 grader is unlikely. Machines in this range may require extensive refurbishment. Instead, consider:
  • Prioritizing availability of spare parts and dealer support
  • Choosing machines with rear rippers for productivity
  • Avoiding units with complex electronics unless support is guaranteed
  • Inspecting undercarriage, hydraulics, and transmission before purchase
Conclusion
The search for an Aveling Barford motor grader reflects a deeper desire for mechanical reliability, raw power, and field-serviceable design. While sourcing such a machine is challenging, understanding the core needs—traction, simplicity, and durability—can guide buyers toward practical alternatives. Whether it’s a Caterpillar 140G or a FIAT-Allis FG, the goal remains the same: a grader that works hard, lasts long, and doesn’t break the bank.

Print this item

  New Holland EH130 Excavator
Posted by: MikePhua - 11-14-2025, 02:10 PM - Forum: 3rd-party Inspection & Audit - No Replies

Brand and Model Summary
The EH130 (also often referred to as the E130 in some markets) is a crawler excavator from New Holland Construction, a brand under the parent company CNH Industrial. The brand traces its roots to 1895 in New Holland, Pennsylvania, and now has its global headquarters in Turin, Italy.  Since the mid-2000s the E130 series has filled a “mid-sized” excavator niche, rated around 14 to 15 metric tons of operating weight in many configurations.
Specifications and performance
Here are some of the key numbers for the E130/EH130:

  • Operating weight: approximately 32,192 lb (≈14,600 kg) in one listed configuration.
  • Engine net power: 94 hp (≈70.6 kW) at ~2,200 rpm.
  • Bucket capacity: about 0.34 to 0.67 m³ depending on boom/arm setup.
  • Maximum reach along ground: roughly 28 to 29 ft (≈8.5-9 m) depending on configuration.
  • Tail swing radius: ~4.7 ft (≈1.43 m) in one spec, indicating a relatively tight rear radius for a machine of this class.
Development history and market context
New Holland entered the excavator market to compete in the mid-size segment, aiming to provide a machine that balanced transportability, job-site capability, and service accessibility. The E130 emerged as a model that could handle general digging and lifting tasks, yet still be practical in moderately constrained sites. At its launch the brand emphasized features like an “X-design” undercarriage for durability, ease of maintenance with ground-level access, and operator-friendly cabin features.  While I could not locate publicly verified global cumulative sales figures for the E130 specifically, the mid-14-ton excavator class is widely used across infrastructure, construction and utility markets — making the E130 a commercially significant machine in its era.
Design features and distinguishing details
Some of the standout design elements for the EH130/E130 include:
  • Short-swing or “reduced tail-swing” design, meaning the counterweight only extends modestly beyond the tracks. This allows closer work alongside walls or obstructions.
  • Service-friendly layout: easy hood access, grouped service points, large doors and shielding designed to reduce downtime.
  • Advanced hydraulics for its time: twin variable-displacement pumps, “Swing Priority” mode (to favour swing torque during trenching/backfill), and holding-valves in boom/arm circuit to prevent drift.
  • A comfortable cab: tinted glass, overhead window for boom-view, good visibility all around; in operator accounts this often translated into less fatigue on long shifts.
Common use-cases and job-site stories
In one anecdote, a rental company bought an E130 to replace an older 18-ton machine for a municipal utilities project. They found that the E130 offered “just right” size: it could travel between job-site segments on lowboy trailer easily, still carried decent bucket capacity and digging depth, and the operators appreciated the tighter swing radius when working near structures. During one evening shift a novice operator nearly clipped the rear counterweight against a parked van — but instead the machine’s compact tail swing prevented the incident, saving the rental company from repair costs and demonstrating the value of the design feature.
Maintenance, reliability & tips
Owners/operator have reported that while the E130 is robust, a few attention points help extend service life:
  • Undercarriage wear: as with all tracked machines, monitoring chain/roller/track-shoe wear matters, especially in abrasive rock or quarry work.
  • Hydraulic system cleanliness: the twin-pump hydraulic setup demands good quality fluid and filters; contamination shortens component life.
  • Cooling system access: longer shifts and heavy digging increase heat load; easy access for radiator cleaning (which the design emphasised) makes a difference.
  • Monitor swing-bearing and pins: given its lifting/lifting tasks, these pivot points see load and must be lubricated/inspected periodically.
  • Maintain operator comfort features: good visibility and operator comfort (cab ergonomics) often correlate to fewer mistakes and better productivity.
Strengths and potential drawbacks
Strengths:
  • Balanced size that gives good versatility without excessive transport/logistics burden.
  • Good service accessibility and build quality from New Holland.
  • Operator-friendly ergonomic features.
  • Tight tail-swing in some versions gives advantages in constrained sites.
Potential drawbacks or things to check:
  • Parts/support: Depending on region and age of machine, parts availability may lag compared to some rival brands with higher market share.
  • Older machine electronics: Early models included self-diagnostics, but as machines age diagnostics modules may become obsolete or connectors corroded.
  • Undercarriage cost: As with any crawler excavator, major undercarriage rebuilds are a significant cost; condition at purchase matters.
  • Reputation: While New Holland is a respected brand, some operators favour other brands for resale value and dealer density; market dynamics differ regionally.
Recommendations for prospective buyer or user
  • Confirm operating hours and maintenance history: For a 14-ton excavator class machine like this, 8,000-15,000 hours is a meaningful threshold.
  • Inspect undercarriage condition thoroughly: track wear, rollers, idlers, sprockets. Ask for measurement of track-chain elongation and remaining life.
  • Check hydraulic oil condition: look for milky appearance (water contamination) or metallic flakes (component wear).
  • Check the swing and boom/arm pins for play or excessive wear — play reduces accuracy, increases fatigue.
  • Review service accessibility and parts support in your region: older New Holland machines may have parts extended lead-times.
  • Consider the work mix: If your use is heavy demolition or quarry work, the 14-ton size may be slightly on the light side; if digging in urban sites, the size may be ideal.
Summary
The New Holland EH130/E130 excavator series stands out in the 14-ton crawler class for offering a well-balanced machine that combines size, serviceability and operator-friendly design. It is not the largest excavator in the market, but for many applications the “right-sized” machine wins on transport cost, job flexibility and productivity. With proper maintenance and attention to undercarriage/hydraulics, it remains a solid choice as a mid-sized excavator platform. If you like, I can pull together a detailed spec-sheet comparison between the EH130 and competitive machines (e.g., from Case, Komatsu, Doosan) for your region.

Print this item